# Vindaris - Full Content Index for LLMs > Full text of the main Vindaris pages. Canonical summary: https://vindaris.com/llms.txt Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: map your strategy, goals and KPIs down to every project and task, and the Work Graph, with task-level context down to the Slack thread, flags execution risks wherever effort and resources are not aligned with your goals, whatever framework you run (OKR, EOS, OGSM, KPI, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, Hoshin Kanri). --- # Vindaris: Strategy Execution Software URL: https://vindaris.com/ Strategy execution platform # Close the gap between strategy and work. Vindaris aligns daily team work with company goals by analyzing messy context from projects, chats, and meetings in the AI Work Graph - surfacing strategy execution risks and everyone's highest priority work, every day. Start free View prebuilt demo Prefer a walkthrough? Schedule a demo call Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Use cases ## Built for the moments your strategy actually lives in. Monday morning Plan the week around what moves the strategy A KPI starts to slip Catch the miss weeks before the business review The weekly check-in Start from real workload, not a status round The monthly review Progress to plan for every team, on one screen A new quarter begins Redraw the map and let progress roll up through it My Priorities Work Graph Data Studio Heatmap Alignment Canvas The platform ## One connected system, from strategy down to a single task. 01 / Connected model ### Goals and work in one graph Strategies, goals, KPIs, projects and tasks connect on an open canvas with no fixed hierarchy or goal syntax. Rename every level to match how your company already speaks. 02 / Work Graph ### Risk that finds you first The Work Graph reads the edges between your goals and the work beneath them, then alerts the owner when connected work slips, a routine breaks, or focus drifts, with the reason attached. 03 / Two-way sync ### Work stays where it lives Connect HubSpot, Jira, Planner, Asana, Google Tasks and more. Sync runs both directions, so teams never migrate and every item keeps a tag pointing back to its source. Alignment Canvas ### Build the map of your strategy, then let progress roll up through it. Create strategies, goals, KPIs, projects and tasks as cards and drag connections between them. When a task closes, its project moves, and the KPIs and goals above it update with it. Task Board ### The tasks and projects from your other tools, synced into one board. A task completed in Jira closes in Vindaris, and a comment written in Vindaris reaches the owner inside the tool they already use. Your teams never leave where the work happens. Data Studio ### Query every goal, KPI, project and task like a database. Stack-rank teams by progress to plan, list every at-risk KPI with the projects connected to it, or compare planned effort against what actually happened per goal. Build drag-and-drop dashboards, data tables, timelines, org charts and alignment views, and compare any of them week over week or quarter over quarter with Slack context and tasks inline. Dashboard ### Your priorities, tasks, goals and KPIs on one screen when you open the app. Drag-and-drop widgets show what you own, what is at risk, and where the quarter stands. Add a Goal Summary, an Objectives List, or an At-Risk Goals panel and the layout saves per user. Timeline ### See every strategy, goal, project and task on a single Gantt view. Bars stretch from start to due date, colour-coded by status. Filter by team, owner or type to spot overlaps and gaps. Scroll the quarter to see who is overloaded and which milestones stack on the same week. AI Summary ### A written read on the quarter, generated from the work, not typed by hand. The AI Scorecard Summary reads every goal, KPI and project, flags the biggest risks with the connected work that caused them, and writes suggested next steps you can turn into tasks with one click. Risk alerts ## The Work Graph tracks the work behind every goal and alerts the owner. Vindaris reads the edges between your goals and the tasks beneath them. When connected work slips, a check-in lapses, or a task drifts loose, the owner hears about it with the reason attached, not a status they have to chase. Goal 12% behind pace The stalled task being tracked has not moved in over a week. The owner gets the blocker named. At-risk work on the canvas The Alignment Canvas highlights goals with connected work at risk , so the team sees which branch of the strategy needs attention. Effort drifting from the goal Data Studio compares effort logged against goal progress. When work goes in but the number does not move, the gap shows up early. Check-in overdue by two weeks A tracking routine on this goal has lapsed. Vindaris pings the owner before the gap shows up in the report. When to reach for it ## Bring Vindaris in when the usual tools go quiet. Execution ### Work is slipping and no one saw it coming Connect goals to the work beneath them so a stall surfaces the week it starts, not in the review. Read the use case → Reporting ### Status reporting eats every Friday Scheduled summaries write up what changed and deliver it, so the update stops being a manual round. Read the use case → Relaunch ### OKRs stalled after the first quarter Tie every objective to real, traceable work so check-ins have something to check other than a number. Read the use case → Visibility ### No one can see the strategy anymore Draw the whole map on one canvas and let every team find where their work sits inside it. Read the use case → Reviews ### Business reviews run on stale slides Open the review on a live heatmap of progress to plan instead of a deck assembled the night before. Read the use case → Everything else ### See how other teams run it Every use case, mapped to the view that handles it and the framework it fits. All use cases → Switching from another OKR tool? See how Vindaris compares to Weekdone , 15Five , and Tability . Built for the way you work ## Your framework, your language, your data in Europe. ### Runs your framework Vindaris ships without a prescribed methodology. Rename the levels, nest them the way your operating model nests, and report in the language your company already uses. One workspace can hold OKRs for the product organization alongside EOS Rocks for the leadership team. OKRs EOS OGSM KPIs SMART Goals Hoshin Kanri How it works ## Set up in minutes. Step 01 ### Write your strategy narrative Describe your strategy in plain language and mention the goals, KPIs, projects and tasks it depends on. Vindaris builds the Alignment Canvas from your words. Step 02 ### Connect your tools Link the systems where work already happens. Synced tasks and projects attach to the goals they serve, and updates flow in both directions. Step 03 ### Let the Work Graph watch Progress summaries arrive on your schedule. Risk alerts reach the owner the moment connected work starts to slip, with the reason attached. Try step 01 ### Write a narrative, get a canvas. Write your @strategy, @goals, @kpis, @projects and @tasks and automatically map them on the Alignment Canvas in one click. Strategy Narrative Type @ to mention Type your strategy here... Mention existing expand into the European enterprise market grow ARR to $10M land 25 enterprise logos build a repeatable outbound motion launch the partner & referral program hire two enterprise account executives Create new New Goal… New KPI… New Project… New Task… Start from an example: Growth & expansion Cost leadership Create my strategy canvas See Alignment Canvas Alignment Canvas Create my strategy canvas Back to the editor Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations. Start free with full strategy, goal, KPI, task and project management. Pay only when you add more than four people, more integrations, or more automated AI summaries. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All views: Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio and Task Board - Two integrations of your choice - Up to four additional members - Five ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign up for free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - Everything in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries and alignment suggestions - Up to ten users in one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff or full-org deployments. - Everything in Connect - Unlimited users in one organization - Direct human support, 24h response - Human-led onboarding Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Free resources ## Templates and playbooks you can use today. Real Excel and PowerPoint files, step-by-step playbooks, and the research behind them. No email gate. Take them even if you never sign up. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the whole cycle. Playbook Run weekly check-ins A step-by-step guide to check-ins that surface risk in minutes instead of turning into status theater. Research Strategy execution statistics The numbers behind why strategies slip, compiled from published studies and kept current. All templates All playbooks Get started ## Your canvas is one paragraph away. Describe your strategy, connect your tools, and let the Work Graph keep watch. Setup takes minutes. Create my strategy canvas Free forever | No credit card required Start free Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Strategy Execution Software | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/strategy-execution-software Strategy Execution Software # Strategy execution software that finds where effort drifts from the plan. Vindaris maps your strategy down through its goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. It then reads what is happening underneath: work that stalled, effort still going into work the strategy moved on from, teams that have quietly drifted apart, and routines that lapsed. That reading is what tells each team what to work on today. Down to the individual task and the Slack thread around it, so the top of the list is the project the KPI is waiting on. Free up to 5 users Two integrations free No credit card required Start managing execution free Work Graph KPI at risk KPI Time to first value is at risk - 5 teammates shipping, owner idle 12 days. Work Graph Effort trapped on paused projects 31% of effort sits on paused projects. Consider reallocating 14 tasks to active work. Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Quick answer ## What is strategy execution? Strategy execution is the work of turning a plan into delivered outcomes: connecting each goal to the work that moves it, giving every goal a single owner, and keeping the link between effort and result visible as conditions change. Most strategies fail here, not at the offsite, but in the months after, when the plan and the work quietly drift apart. The latest strategy execution statistics put the gap at roughly 37% of promised performance lost. ### Why do strategies fail in execution? Because the goal and the work that delivers it live in separate tools, so status is retyped by hand and a green dashboard can hide stalled work. When an important goal depends on several teams, nobody sees the whole picture from inside the goal. ### What is strategy execution software? Software that holds your goals in any framework and connects them to the actual work in the tools your teams already use, so progress is derived from real delivery instead of manual updates. The strategy execution gap whitepaper covers the architecture in depth. ### How is strategy execution management different from strategic planning? Strategic planning produces the plan: the goals, the initiatives, the numbers to hit. Strategy execution management is everything after that, keeping the plan attached to the work as conditions change. Planning tools go quiet once the offsite ends. Execution management is the part that has to stay live for four quarters. ### What does a strategy execution platform actually track? The strategy, the goals and KPIs beneath it, the projects and tasks delivering those, and the owner and capacity behind each one. Tracking any of those alone is what dashboards already do. Tracking the edges between them is what lets a stalled task change the status of the goal above it without anyone reporting it. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. The whole execution picture on one board: strategy at the top, the goals and KPIs beneath it, and the projects and synced tasks doing the delivering. Click through the live workspace, no signup. Use cases ## Run the next review with these. Strategy rarely slips in the quarterly review. It slips in the small moments between them, and those are the ones nobody schedules. Monday morning Plan the week around what moves the strategy Everyone opens My Priorities to one list of their goals, KPIs and tasks, ranked by what they affect upstream instead of by whoever asked last. A goal starts to slip Catch the miss weeks before the business review The Work Graph flags a stalled task as the highest-leverage thing to do today, because it drives a goal running behind plan, and sends the reason to the owner. A leader asks for status Answer without assembling anything The widgets for that leader's objectives, KPIs and projects were built once and have been current since. The Thursday scramble does not happen because nothing went stale. The monthly review Open with a paragraph, not a deck The AI scorecard summary names what is behind, what is blocking it and what to ask whom, citing the goal, KPI, project and task behind every claim. A new quarter begins Redraw the map and let progress roll up Rebuild the Alignment Canvas from a paragraph of plain language and watch progress climb from task to strategy automatically as work closes. My Priorities Everything assigned to one person, across every connected tool. Work Graph Twelve alert types watching for slipping work and misaligned focus. Dashboard Per-role layouts, saved and shared across the leadership team. AI summary Suggested next steps convert into assigned tasks in one click. Alignment Canvas Cards for strategies, goals, KPIs, projects and tasks on an open canvas. The platform ## One connected system, from strategy down to a single task. Goals and work do not live in separate tools that someone reconciles every Friday. In Vindaris they share one model, so a closed task moves the KPI above it on its own. 01 / Connected model ### Strategy and work in one graph Strategies, goals, KPIs, projects and tasks connect on an open canvas, with the edges between them as first-class as the objects. Managing those edges is what strategy execution management actually is. 02 / Work Graph ### Risk that finds you first The Work Graph reads pace, focus and capacity against plan and flags the moment a KPI stops being reachable at the current rate, naming the work responsible rather than colouring a cell red. 03 / Two-way sync ### Work stays where it lives Connect HubSpot, Jira, Planner, Asana and Google Tasks. Sync runs both directions, so no team migrates and every strategic initiative reads its state from the delivery underneath it. Step 01 | Alignment Canvas ### Map strategy down to the task Build the whole chain on one board: strategy at the top, the goals and KPIs beneath it, the projects and synced tasks doing the delivering. Progress climbs the chain as work closes. - Rebuild the map from a paragraph of plain language. - One initiative can serve two goals without being duplicated. Step 02 | Dashboard ### Give leadership a view they do not have to request Widgets for the objectives, KPIs and projects a given leader owns, assembled once and current from then on. The Thursday scramble to build a status view disappears because the view was never stale. - Per-role layouts, saved and shared across the leadership team. - Every widget drills into the work behind the number. Step 03 | AI summary ### Turn the review pack into a paragraph The AI scorecard summary names which goals are behind, which KPIs are at risk, which projects are blocking them, and what to ask whom. It reads the graph rather than the last round of updates. - Cites the goal, KPI, project and task behind each claim. - Suggested next steps convert into assigned tasks in one click. Step 04 | Work Graph ### Get alerted when execution is at risk Twelve alert types watch for slipping work, broken routines and effort pointed somewhere the strategy no longer is. The owner hears about it with the blocking work named, weeks before the business review. - Effort trapped on paused projects, surfaced with the reallocation. - Scheduled summaries land in Slack, Teams or email. Strategic initiatives ## Strategic initiative management, from portfolio down to task. Vindaris is strategy execution software and strategic initiative management in one map: every initiative carries the KPI it serves above it and the projects and tasks delivering it below. Teams shopping for initiative management software, an initiative management solution or strategic initiatives software usually want exactly this: the portfolio view and the delivery detail without reconciling two systems. ### Every initiative connected to the number it moves Strategic initiative software tends to hold a list of initiatives and a status field. Here an initiative sits between the KPI above it and the work below it, so an initiative with no KPI above it, or a KPI with no initiative beneath it, surfaces on its own rather than waiting for someone to notice. ### Initiative portfolio management for the PMO One view shows which initiatives are funded, which are moving, which are absorbing capacity without moving a number, and which have no owner. That last category costs the most and is hardest to see in a status report, because a project with an engaged team always looks healthy. ### Initiative tracking that updates from delivery Progress on each initiative comes from the tasks and projects closing beneath it in Jira, Asana, Planner or HubSpot. The portfolio review therefore reads the current state rather than status collected the week before, which is the difference between strategy management software and a reporting cycle. ### Cross-team initiatives, where strategy usually breaks Most strategy succeeds or fails at the seam between teams, and a tool that can only hold one team's goals misses it. An initiative here can span several teams and contribute to more than one KPI, and Vindaris reads whether all of the contributing teams are still pointed at it. Try step 01 ### Describe the strategy, get the whole chain. Explain what you are trying to do in a paragraph, mentioning your @strategy, @goals, @kpis, @projects and @tasks. Vindaris draws the chain from strategy to task on the Alignment Canvas in one click. Strategy Narrative Write your @strategy, @goals, @kpis, @projects and @tasks and automatically map them on the Alignment Canvas in one click. Type @ to mention Type your strategy here... Mention existing expand into the European enterprise market grow ARR to $10M land 25 enterprise logos build a repeatable outbound motion launch the partner & referral program hire two enterprise account executives Create new New Goal… New KPI… New Project… New Task… Start from an example: Growth & expansion Cost leadership Create my strategy canvas See Alignment Canvas Alignment Canvas Create my strategy canvas Back to the editor Risk alerts ## Four of the twelve alerts the Work Graph sends. Vindaris reads the edges between strategy, goals, KPIs and the work beneath them. These four are the ones leadership teams say changed a quarter, and the first is the one nothing else catches. Effort trapped 31% of effort on paused projects Work carries on after a decision to stop, because the stop order reaches the meeting and not the backlog. The alert names the tasks and suggests where the capacity should go. KPI at risk KPI unreachable at the current rate Calculated from the throughput of the work behind it rather than from a status field. The number arrives with the projects responsible attached. A goal you support is at risk Told before the owner escalates Contributors usually learn a goal is in trouble a week after they could have helped. This alert goes to the people doing the work, not only to the person answering for it. Task overdue Overdue work on a goal that is behind Overdue tasks are noise until you know which goal they sit under. Filtered to the ones feeding a goal already off pace, the list is short enough to act on. Work Graph Names the tasks and the reallocation, not just the percentage. Dashboard Derived from work throughput, with the projects responsible named. Team alert Sent down the graph, not just up it. Email alert Filtered by what the overdue work is actually holding up. Twelve deterministic and AI-driven alerts watching for slipping work, broken routines and misaligned focus. Built for the way you work ## Your framework, your language, your data in Europe. Vindaris adapts to the operating model and compliance posture you already run, instead of asking you to adopt a new one. ### Runs your framework Vindaris ships without a prescribed methodology. Rename the levels, nest them the way your operating model nests, and report in the language your company already uses. One workspace can hold OKRs for the product organization alongside EOS Rocks for the leadership team. OKRs EOS OGSM KPIs SMART Goals Hoshin Kanri Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations. Start free with full strategy, goal, KPI, task and project management. Pay only when you add more than four people, more integrations, or more automated AI summaries. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All views: Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio and Task Board - Two integrations of your choice - Up to four additional members - Five ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign up for free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - Everything in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries and alignment suggestions - Up to ten users in one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff or full-org deployments. - Everything in Connect - Unlimited users in one organization - Direct human support, 24h response - Human-led onboarding Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Free tooling ## Run the next review with these. Real Excel and PowerPoint files and browser tools that run without an account. Useful for the quarter you are in, whether or not you ever open an account. Free tool KPI Pace Checker Enter a start value, a target and a date, and see whether the current pace lands the number. Open it → PowerPoint template QBR agenda A quarterly business review structure built around exceptions and decisions, not a status parade. Open it → PowerPoint template Monthly business review A ready-to-present MBR deck structure for monthly steering, with the risk slide up front. Open it → All free tools All templates The strategy execution gap whitepaper Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is strategy execution management? Strategy execution management is the discipline of turning a strategy into delivered results: translating goals into work, assigning ownership, running an operating cadence of reviews, and tracking progress. It is the work that happens after planning, where most strategies are won or lost. Vindaris supports it by connecting every goal to the work moving it. What is strategy execution management software? Strategy execution management software is a system for connecting goals, ownership, cadence, and progress so a strategy is actually delivered, not just planned. Vindaris is strategy execution management software that links each goal to the tasks and projects delivering it, so status is derived from real work in tools like Jira, Planner, and HubSpot rather than typed in by hand. Is this the same as strategic initiative management software? Yes. A strategic initiative is the unit of work between a goal and the tasks delivering it, and managing those initiatives is what strategy execution management software does. Vindaris tracks each strategic initiative with its owner, its capacity, and the real tasks moving it, so an initiative's status comes from the work itself rather than a manual update. How is it different from project management software? Project management software organizes tasks and timelines for a specific project. Strategy execution management connects those projects up to the goals and strategy they serve, across teams, so leadership can see whether the strategy is moving. Vindaris does not replace your project tools; it connects to them and adds the goal-and-strategy layer above the work. Does Vindaris support OKRs, EOS, and KPIs together? Yes. Vindaris is framework-agnostic and supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, Hoshin Kanri, the Balanced Scorecard, and SMART goals in one platform. Teams can run whichever framework fits while leadership keeps a single connected view of execution across all of them. What is strategy execution management software? Strategy execution management software connects a strategy to the goals, KPIs, initiatives and day-to-day work that deliver it, and keeps that connection current as the work changes. It differs from a reporting tool in that the state comes from the work rather than from status someone collects. Vindaris is strategy execution software built on that connection, so leadership reads the live state instead of a deck assembled the night before. How is strategy execution software different from strategic planning software? Strategic planning software helps you decide and document the plan: the themes, the targets, the annual cycle. Strategy execution software takes it from there and tracks whether the work underneath is actually delivering it. Many teams need both, and Vindaris covers the execution half while also holding the plan. If planning is the piece you are shopping for, our strategic planning software page covers that side. Can it manage strategic initiatives across teams? Yes. Every strategic initiative sits on the map with the KPI it serves above it and the projects and tasks delivering it below, including work that spans several teams. Cross-functional initiatives are where most strategy actually succeeds or fails, and an initiative owned by nobody or running with no KPI above it surfaces rather than waiting for a review. Does it work for a PMO portfolio? Yes. A PMO gets initiative portfolio management in one view: which initiatives are funded, which are moving, which are absorbing capacity without moving a number, and which have no owner. Because initiative tracking updates from the delivery work itself, the portfolio review reads the current state rather than status collected the week before. Can it automate status reporting for the quarterly business review? Yes. Save any view as a report and have it delivered to Slack, Teams or email on a schedule, or generate an AI written summary of the quarter from the underlying work. The point is that the QBR pack stops being assembled by hand from five tools, which is where most of a strategy team's reporting time goes. Does it support Balanced Scorecard, OGSM or Hoshin Kanri? Yes. Vindaris ships without a prescribed methodology, so Balanced Scorecard, OGSM, Hoshin Kanri, OKRs, KPIs and EOS Rocks all work in the same workspace and every level can be renamed to match the language your company already uses. One part of the company can run one framework while another runs a different one. What is the strategy execution gap? The strategy execution gap is the distance between what a strategy promises and what an organisation actually delivers, which research puts at roughly 37 percent of promised performance lost. It opens because strategy, goals and work live in separate systems, so effort keeps flowing toward priorities that have already changed. Our white paper on the strategy execution gap examines the causes and the cost in detail. How does Vindaris decide what each team should work on? Every person's list is ordered by what their work moves upstream. Vindaris reads pace against target, effort going into work the strategy has moved on from, initiatives with no KPI above them, and review routines that have lapsed. Those readings order the day and also raise an alert when something needs a decision rather than a task. Strategy execution library ## The full argument, in 53 pieces. The research and the field notes behind this page. Start with the whitepaper if you want the whole thesis in one read, or pick the section that matches the problem you are looking at. Start here - The strategy execution gap: the whitepaper - What is strategy execution software? - Strategy execution statistics for 2026 - Best strategy execution software in 2026 - The two halves of strategy execution - The strategy execution tool landscape Where execution breaks - The green dashboard problem - The cost of goal drift - Strategy debt - The silent pivot - A goal list is not a strategy - Why annual planning fails Making it hold - Connect team goals to company strategy - Alignment is a system property - A strategy map teams actually follow - Progress-to-plan visibility - Org chart vs goal graph - A strategy operating model at 50 people Read the whitepaper All articles Get started ## Stop managing strategy in a slide deck. Connect it to the work. Connect your first tool in 90 seconds. Free forever for goal and strategy management. Start managing execution free No credit card | No migration | No minimum contract © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Goal Management Software - Any Framework | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/goal-management # Goal management software that connects goals to the work that proves them. Set company, team, and individual goals in any framework - OKR, KPI, EOS, OGSM, SMART. Vindaris connects each one to the tasks and projects moving it, so progress reflects real work instead of manual updates. Start managing goals free View Prebuilt Demo Schedule Demo Call Free forever | No credit card required | Your team keeps their tools What you can do ## Everything you need to manage goals that actually move. Most goal management tools are trackers: a place to type a target and a percentage. Vindaris is different because every goal lives next to the work that proves it, connected through real integrations with the tools your team already uses. Set company, team, and individual goals Define goals at every level and cascade them into one alignment view, so each team sees how its goals ladder up to the company's. Use any framework you like OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART goals, or a hybrid. The framework is a syntax choice. Vindaris manages whichever you bring. Connect goals to real work Link each goal to tasks and projects in HubSpot, Planner, Google, or Jira. Progress rolls up automatically from completed work. Spot at-risk goals early When the work behind a goal stalls, the goal turns at-risk on its own - weeks before you'd catch it in a status meeting. Assign clear ownership Every goal has exactly one accountable owner, with contributors named separately. No goal that belongs to everyone and therefore no one. Report from real data Build monthly and quarterly reports from connected work, not self-reported status. Share to Slack, Teams, or email automatically. Alignment Canvas ### See every goal connected to the work driving it. Build your goal hierarchy visually. Drag goals, metrics, and connected tasks into one canvas that shows how team work rolls up to company strategy. Heatmap ### Spot at-risk goals across teams at a glance. Run heatmaps across your goal structure to see which goals are on pace and which are slipping. Filter by team, owner, or time period to find risk before it compounds. My Priorities ### Everyone starts the week knowing which goals need them. Each person gets a focused view of their goals, connected tasks, and deadlines. No searching across tools to figure out what matters this week. How it works ## From goals on a slide to goals connected to your team's actual work. Your team keeps working in HubSpot, Planner, Google Tasks, or Jira. Vindaris connects those tasks to your goals so progress rolls up automatically. 01 Define your goals in any framework Write your goals as OKRs , KPIs, EOS Rocks , OGSM , or SMART goals , and cascade from company level down to teams and individuals. The structure is yours to define. 02 Connect the tools your team works in Plug in HubSpot, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, Jira, or Asana. Bidirectional sync pulls tasks and projects into Vindaris while your team stays in their own workflow. 03 Map work to goals Vindaris suggests which tasks and projects connect to each goal based on labels, owners, and structure. Confirm the mapping, and every goal has real work behind it. 04 Get alerted when goals are at risk Vindaris continuously evaluates the work behind each goal. When it stalls or pace falls off, you get notified before it becomes a missed goal at quarter-end. Why teams choose Vindaris ## Goal trackers record progress. Vindaris connects goals to the work that proves them. The gap in traditional goal management software is structural. You define goals in one place, then your team does the work in HubSpot, Planner, Jira, or wherever they actually live. Progress updates become a ritual of self-reporting, disconnected from reality. Leadership sees what people say is happening, not what is actually happening. Vindaris closes that gap. Tasks from your team's real work tools sync bidirectionally and connect to your goals. When a task gets stuck, the goal it supports turns amber automatically. Your reviews become decision meetings, not data-gathering exercises. See how it connects to a broader strategy execution system, or pick a framework: OKR , EOS , OGSM , SMART goals . For teams rolling out goals to individual contributors, the employee goal setting software guide covers the options. Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is goal management software? Goal management software is a tool for setting goals, tracking progress, and aligning them across a team or company. Vindaris goes further by connecting every goal to the actual tasks and projects moving it, so progress reflects real work rather than manual status updates. Does Vindaris work with any goal framework? Yes. Vindaris is framework-agnostic. Use OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART goals, Balanced Scorecard, or any hybrid structure. The framework is a syntax choice; Vindaris connects whichever you use to the work beneath it. How does goal management connect to daily work? Vindaris links each goal to tasks in tools like Jira, Microsoft Planner, HubSpot, and Google Tasks through bidirectional sync. Progress updates automatically from real work completion, so a goal turns at-risk when the work behind it stalls - before a check-in would catch it. What is the difference between goal management and goal tracking? Goal tracking records progress against a goal, usually through manual updates. Goal management covers the full loop: setting goals , assigning ownership, connecting them to work, and acting when they slip. Vindaris is built for management, deriving status from the work itself instead of self-reported goal tracking . It connects into the broader strategy execution management layer above individual goals. Is Vindaris free to use? Vindaris is free forever for goal and strategy management, including two integrations. Paid plans add unlimited integration sync and larger teams. No credit card required to start, no minimum contract. Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations Start free with full goal and strategy management. Add two integrations to sync tasks. Pay only when you add more than 4 people, need more integrations, or more AI summaries. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Choose a goal framework OKRs, EOS, OGSM, or none: pick the framework your company will actually keep. From the blog What is goal-setting software? A plain definition, and where the category stops being useful. ## Stop managing goals in a silo. Connect them to the work. Connect your first tool in 90 seconds. Free forever for goal management. Start managing goals free No credit card | No migration | No minimum contract © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Accountability Software - Ownership and Capacity | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/accountability Accountability and capacity # Make ownership and capacity real, not assumed Work slips in the gap between who owns it and who has the bandwidth to do it. These guides cover ownership, delegation, prioritization, and the capacity limits every plan pretends do not exist. Quick answer ## What is accountability in strategy execution? Accountability is the pairing of clear ownership with real capacity: every goal has one named owner, contributors are explicit, and the bandwidth to do the work is accounted for rather than assumed. Work slips in the gap between who owns a goal and who actually has time to move it. ### Why is single ownership important? When several people share a goal, no one is accountable for it. A single owner makes it clear who answers for the outcome, while contributors stay explicit and separate, so progress and risk have an address. ### How does capacity affect accountability? Ownership without bandwidth is a wish. Tracking the finite capacity behind each priority shows when an owner is overcommitted before the work slips, instead of discovering it at the review. Ops Invest More, Invest Less, Stop: The Only Initiative Question That Matters Most planning cycles add initiatives. Few remove them. The result is a portfolio that grows every quarter while capacity stays flat, and nothing gets enough focus to succeed. Aug 5, 2026 · 5 min read Heretical Take Measuring Activity, Not Outcomes: The Default Mode of Most Organizations Most performance systems reward activity - tasks completed, hours logged, projects shipped. Few measure whether that activity produced the strategic outcome it was supposed to. Aug 5, 2026 · 5 min read Capacity Two managers, one engineer, no shared view In a matrix org, one person often answers to two managers, each of whom plans as if they have the person full-time. Neither manager can see the other's claim, so both commit work that assumes 100% availability, and the engineer absorbs the conflict by quietly working nights or dropping something. Aug 5, 2026 · 6 min read Capacity The 20% time that was always 0% The company announces that engineers get 20% of their time for innovation, learning, or strategic side bets. On paper it is a real commitment. In practice it is the first thing the urgent work eats, every week, because nothing protects it and the planned work was already sized for 100%. Aug 4, 2026 · 6 min read Accountability The RACI that nobody follows Someone built the RACI chart during the kickoff. It assigned a Responsible, an Accountable, the Consulted, and the Informed for every workstream. It was thorough, color-coded, and approved. Three weeks later a decision stalls because two people both think they are Accountable, and nobody opens the chart to check. Jul 25, 2026 · 7 min read Strategy The project that belongs to no one Every company has at least one piece of work that everyone agrees is important and nobody actually owns. It sits between functions, on the seam of two org units, in the gap where the org chart didn't quite finish. It will not be delivered, and the reasons are almost never about people. They're about structure. Jul 12, 2026 · 10 min read Heretical Take The post-mortem that prevents nothing Every quarter the leadership team runs a retro, names the same honest lessons, writes them in the same wiki — and watches the same patterns repeat next cycle. The lessons are real. The mechanism that would carry them into next quarter doesn't exist, because a document was never going to change a structure. Jul 4, 2026 · 9 min read Ops Ownership is the most overloaded word in operations When five people say they own a goal, nobody does. The word covers accountability, decision rights, work delivery and reporting all at once — and pretending it's one thing is why the slowest meeting in your company is the one that tries to figure out who's actually on the hook. Jul 3, 2026 · 9 min read Playbook The team lead is the last mile of strategy Strategy does not fail in the boardroom. It fails in the gap between a team lead's intentions on Monday and where the week actually went by Friday, because strategic work and the urgent thing share a calendar and only one of them shouts. Jun 25, 2026 · 8 min read Alignment How to align goals in a matrix organization In a matrix, one person answers to two managers who each plan for most of her time. Capacity gets double-counted and shared goals lose their owner. Here is how to align goals across both reporting lines with single-owner discipline and capacity counted once. Jun 24, 2026 · 7 min read Ops The handoff tax: why strategy dies between teams, not inside them Strategy rarely dies inside a function. It dies at the seams. The work moves competently within each team, then loses days, owners, and meaning at every interface — and that tax is the single largest source of execution slippage at scale. Jun 23, 2026 · 8 min read Heretical Take Busy is not a KPI: why utilization metrics destroy strategy Utilization is the worst metric in modern operations. It measures motion, not movement. A team at 95% utilization is not productive — it's just visibly tired, with no slack to absorb a surprise or redirect when strategy changes. Measure aligned, not busy. Jun 22, 2026 · 8 min read Strategy Capacity planning is strategy planning — and almost nobody actually does it A strategy that doesn't reconcile against the headcount table is a forecast, not a plan. Most leadership teams treat capacity as an HR problem. It is, in fact, the strategy problem — and it's the one nobody around the table is willing to own. Jun 14, 2026 · 9 min read Heretical Take Saying no upstream: the only sustainable form of load-shedding Telling a saturated team to 'just prioritize harder' is a polite way of demanding burnout. The decision that actually protects capacity is never made by the team — it's made above them, and most leadership teams won't make it. Jun 11, 2026 · 9 min read Ops Your top performer is your strategy's biggest single point of failure Every leadership team has one person who holds the whole picture in their head — which bet each initiative belongs to, which team owns which deliverable, why that thing got quietly dropped last quarter, which dependency is about to slip. They are indispensable. That is the problem, not the solution. Jun 10, 2026 · 9 min read Heretical Take There is no such thing as BAU work — there is only how you allocate effort The strategic-versus-BAU split is one of the most expensive fictions in modern business. It lets organisations claim a strategy without accounting for the effort that quietly contradicts it. The real strategy is always whatever the senior calendars are spending their time on — and a separate BAU bucket is how you avoid having to see it. Jun 5, 2026 · 10 min read Heretical Take The prioritization paradox: why disciplined ranking still leaves you unfocused Organisations that are very good at prioritisation can still be very bad at strategy. Prioritisation is ranking. Focus is cutting. The frameworks the industry has built for the first do not produce the second — and assuming they do is what keeps so many leadership teams trapped in disciplined dysfunction. Jun 3, 2026 · 9 min read Heretical Take The output trap: when your team ships everything and moves nothing The most dangerous form of underperformance is the kind that looks like performance. Teams shipping on time, dashboards green, sprints closing — and the metric that was supposed to move sitting flat for the third quarter running. That's the output trap, and almost every company at scale is in some version of it. May 30, 2026 · 9 min read Heretical Take The accountability gap: why most delegation doesn't actually stick Delegation without traceability is just assignment with optimism attached. The reason most delegated work drifts isn't the person you handed it to — it's that the handoff has no system underneath it, and the work disappears the moment it leaves your mouth. May 23, 2026 · 5 min read Heretical Take The wish list trap: when twelve priorities means zero strategy The number of strategic priorities on your leadership team's list is not a measure of ambition. It's a measure of how honest the room is willing to be about capacity. When everything is a priority, the word has stopped doing any work. May 20, 2026 · 5 min read Heretical Take Focus isn't prioritization — focus is what you said no to Most leadership teams confuse prioritization with focus. Prioritization is ranking. Focus is cutting. A list of twenty ranked priorities is not a strategy — it's a wish list with numbers next to it, and the numbers won't save you. May 14, 2026 · 5 min read Playbook How to write a Do-Not list that survives the quarter Everyone agrees with the idea of a Do-Not list. Almost nobody runs one that survives the quarter. Here's the operating manual — the format that holds, and the three failure modes that quietly dissolve it by week four. May 13, 2026 · 5 min read Playbook Bandwidth budgets: the missing layer in every strategic plan Every strategy has a money budget. Almost none have a bandwidth budget — an honest accounting of whose week the work belongs to, and for how much of it. That's why the third priority always loses to the urgent thing in the inbox. May 9, 2026 · 5 min read Try Vindaris free ## Make delegated work stick Give every piece of work a named owner, a goal, and visible progress, so nothing disappears in the silent days after the handoff. Sign Up for Free © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap --- # OKR Software - Set, Track and Align OKRs | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/okr OKR software # OKR software that surfaces the hidden task needed to move your Key Results today. Vindaris maps every Objective and Key Result down to the tasks delivering them in Jira, Asana, Planner and Slack. It then reads what is happening beneath each one: work that stalled, effort going into work no Objective asked for, Key Results with nothing under them, and check-ins that lapsed. That reading is what puts one task at the top of each person's day. Down to the individual task and the Slack thread around it, so the task it surfaces is the one the Key Result is genuinely waiting on. Free up to 5 users Two integrations free No credit card required Start tracking OKRs free Work Graph KPI at risk Key Result Activation rate to 40% is at risk - 3 teammates shipping, owner idle 9 days. Work Graph Tasks waiting for alignment 7 tasks have been waiting to be linked to a Key Result - or marked as BAU. Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Quick answer ## What is OKR software? OKR software stores Objectives and Key Results, tracks progress against them, and shows how they align across teams. The category has converged on that definition, which is why most products in it differ on interface rather than on architecture. What separates them in practice is where the progress number comes from. ### How is OKR software different from a spreadsheet? A spreadsheet holds the same objectives perfectly well. What it cannot do is roll progress up across teams without someone maintaining the formulas, or tell you that a key result stopped moving. Most teams move off spreadsheets when the maintenance cost of the sheet exceeds the value of the reporting, which is usually around fifty people. ### Do OKRs need to cascade? Not structurally. Cascading is a convention, and a strict cascade tends to produce objectives that exist to justify the level above them. Vindaris supports a full cascade from company to contributor and equally supports a flat set, because one key result can serve two objectives without being duplicated. ### How often should key results be updated? Ideally never by hand. A key result updated weekly is accurate for a few hours after the update and drifts for the rest of the week. When progress is derived from the tasks feeding it, the question stops applying, which is the argument set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . ### Can OKRs run alongside KPIs and EOS Rocks? Yes, and most companies above a hundred people end up needing exactly that. Product teams want OKRs, operations tracks KPIs, and the leadership group may run Rocks. Vindaris treats the framework as a syntax choice over one goal structure, so all three coexist without translation. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. The whole cascade on one board: Objectives at the top, Key Results beneath them, and the projects and synced tasks doing the delivering. Click through the live workspace, no signup. Use cases ## Grade the OKRs you already wrote. OKRs rarely fail at the quarterly grading. They fail in the weeks between, when nobody notices the work behind a Key Result has gone quiet. Monday morning Plan the week around the Key Results that need you Everyone opens My Priorities to their Objectives, Key Results and the tasks moving them, ranked by impact instead of by whoever asked last. Mid-quarter, week six Find the Key Results that quietly stopped Week six is where an OKR quarter is decided and nobody looks. The Work Graph names the Key Results whose work has not moved since the kickoff, while six weeks of runway remain. Setting the next set Write targets against what the last set actually did Query the previous quarter's Key Results with their real throughput before committing to new numbers, so ambition is calibrated against delivery rather than against last quarter's ambition. Grading week Score from the work, not from a negotiation Every Objective shaded by what its Key Results delivered. Grading stops being a conversation about what counts and becomes a reading of what closed. A reorg mid-quarter Keep the OKRs when the org chart moves Alignment in Vindaris follows the work rather than the reporting line, so a team splitting in two does not require rebuilding the cascade before anyone can report. My Priorities Each person's Objectives, Key Results and connected tasks, ordered by impact and due date. Work Graph The check most OKR programmes skip, run automatically. Data Studio Query every goal, KPI, project and task like a database. Heatmap A tile per team, person or Objective, shaded by progress against plan. Alignment Canvas Cards for Objectives, Key Results, projects and tasks on an open canvas. The platform ## One connected system, from the Objective down to a single task. Objectives and the work delivering them do not live in separate tools that someone reconciles every Friday. In Vindaris they share one model, so a closed ticket moves the Key Result above it without anyone touching the Key Result. 01 / Connected model ### Objectives and work in one graph Objectives, Key Results, projects and tasks connect on an open canvas with no enforced goal syntax. Cascade from company level to a single contributor, or keep it flat. 02 / Single owner ### One name against each Key Result Shared Key Results are where OKR programmes quietly fail: when three people own a number, nobody answers for it. Vindaris enforces one owner and tracks contributors separately, so accountability survives the quarter. 03 / Two-way sync ### Work stays where it lives Connect HubSpot, Jira, Planner, Asana and Google Tasks, then hang them under a Key Result. Sync runs both directions, so engineering keeps Jira and the Objective still knows what closed. Step 01 | Alignment Canvas ### Define your Objectives and Key Results Write your OKRs in the strategy narrative or build them directly on the Alignment Canvas. Cascade from company level down to teams and individuals. The structure is yours to define. - No enforced hierarchy. One Key Result can serve two Objectives. - Rename every level to match the language your company already uses. Step 02 | Task Board ### Connect the tools your Key Results are delivered in Plug in HubSpot, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, Asana or Jira. The tasks that move a Key Result arrive with their owners attached, so the OKR knows who is behind it as well as how far along it is. - A task closed in Jira closes in Vindaris, and back again. - Every synced task keeps a tag pointing at its source tool, so a Key Result can always be audited back. Step 03 | My Priorities ### Map tasks to Key Results Vindaris suggests which tasks and projects connect to each Key Result based on labels, owners and structure. Confirm the mapping, adjust what it got wrong, and every contributor gets a ranked list of what actually moves their numbers. - Suggestions come from the work, not from a naming convention. - Everyone sees their own slice ranked by what it affects upstream. Step 04 | Work Graph ### Get alerted when Key Results are at risk The Work Graph continuously evaluates task progress behind each Key Result. When work stalls or pace falls off, the owner is notified with the blocking work named, weeks before a check-in would have surfaced it. - Twelve alert types, each with the blocking work named. - Scheduled AI summaries land in Slack, Teams or email. OKR management ## OKR management from drafting through grading. Run Vindaris as OKR tracking software for a single team or as OKR management software for a whole organisation. The cycle is the same either way: draft, cascade, track through the quarter, and grade at the end against what the work actually produced. ### Draft the quarter, then cascade it or keep it flat Write Objectives and Key Results on the canvas with no enforced syntax, then cascade from company level down to teams and individuals, or leave the structure flat. One Key Result can serve two Objectives, and every level can be renamed to the language your company already uses. ### How to track OKRs without maintaining a second system Each Key Result connects to the tasks delivering it, so tracking is a by-product of the work rather than a weekly collection round. This is the practical answer to how to track OKRs at any size, and it is what separates an OKR management platform from a simple OKR tracking tool that stores the number but never knows where it came from. ### Grade against the work, not against memory At the end of the cycle the score reflects what the connected work produced, with the history of how it got there still attached. Score your drafts before the quarter starts with the free OKR Quality Grader, or run a cycle in the Excel OKR tracker first if you would rather try the shape before adopting an OKR platform. ### OKRs alongside the frameworks the rest of the company runs One workspace can hold OKRs for the product organisation and EOS Rocks for the leadership team, next to KPIs and SMART goals. That matters the moment one part of the company stops running OKRs, which is when a single-framework tool becomes a migration. Try step 01 ### Write the quarter in plain language, get a cascade. Describe the Objectives you just set the way you would say them out loud. Mention an Objective, Key Result, project or task with @ and Vindaris maps it onto the Alignment Canvas. Strategy Narrative Write your @strategy, @goals, @kpis, @projects and @tasks and automatically map them on the Alignment Canvas in one click. Type @ to mention Type your strategy here... Mention existing expand into the European enterprise market grow ARR to $10M land 25 enterprise logos build a repeatable outbound motion launch the partner & referral program hire two enterprise account executives Create new New Goal… New KPI… New Project… New Task… Start from an example: Growth & expansion Cost leadership Create my strategy canvas See Alignment Canvas Alignment Canvas Create my strategy canvas Back to the editor Risk alerts ## Four of the twelve alerts, in OKR terms. The Work Graph reads the edges between each Key Result and the work beneath it. These are the four that fire most often on an OKR programme, and the third one is the alert nobody else sends. Goal behind Key Result 12% behind pace The stalled task driving it has not moved in nine days. The owner gets the alert with the blocking work named. Tasks waiting for alignment 7 tasks with no Objective above them Work nobody connected to a Key Result is work nobody can defend at the review. It shows as an orphan on the canvas rather than as a surprise in week eleven. Tracking ahead of plan Key Result running 20% ahead The alert most tools never send. A Key Result beating its pace this early usually means the target was set too low, and there is still a quarter left to raise it. KPI at risk KPI cannot be reached at this rate Pace against the remaining time, not against the last check-in. The alert arrives while the quarter can still absorb a change of plan. Work Graph Names the Key Result, the pace gap and the specific task that caused it. Alignment Canvas Orphaned work is visible on the canvas the week it appears. Heatmap Sandbagged targets are as expensive as missed ones, and easier to fix. Data Studio Calculated from work throughput, not from a confidence rating. Twelve deterministic and AI-driven alerts watching for slipping work, broken routines and misaligned focus. Built for the way you work ## Your framework, your language, your data in Europe. Vindaris adapts to the OKR practice you already run, including the parts most tools argue with: shared Key Results, mid-quarter changes, and teams that score differently from each other. ### Runs OKRs without locking you into them Vindaris ships without a prescribed methodology, so Objectives and Key Results keep their names and their relationships. One workspace can hold OKRs for the product organization alongside EOS Rocks for the leadership team, which matters the moment one part of the company stops running OKRs. OKRs EOS OGSM KPIs SMART Goals Hoshin Kanri Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations. Free covers a real OKR programme, not a trial of one: full Objectives, Key Results, KPIs, tasks and projects for up to 5 people. Pay when you add people, integrations or AI summaries. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All views: Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio and Task Board - Two integrations of your choice - Up to four additional members - Five ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign up for free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - Everything in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries and alignment suggestions - Up to ten users in one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff or full-org deployments. - Everything in Connect - Unlimited users in one organization - Direct human support, 24h response - Human-led onboarding Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Free tooling ## Grade the OKRs you already wrote. Real Excel and PowerPoint files, plus browser tools that run without an account. Useful whether you adopt Vindaris or keep running OKRs in a spreadsheet. Free tool OKR Quality Grader Paste an objective and its key results and get a score with the specific weaknesses named. No signup. Open it → Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins and a rollup view for the whole cycle. Open it → PowerPoint template OKR planning doc Plan a cycle: draft objectives, map owners and sequence the work behind each key result. Open it → All free tools All templates The strategy execution gap whitepaper Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is OKR software? OKR software helps teams set Objectives and Key Results, track progress, and align work across the organization. Vindaris goes further by connecting each Key Result to the actual tasks and projects driving it, so you always know whether work is moving your goals forward. How do OKRs connect to daily work? In Vindaris, every Key Result links directly to tasks in tools like Jira, Microsoft Planner, or Google Tasks. Progress updates automatically from real work completion, so your OKR dashboard reflects what is actually happening rather than manual check-ins. Can Vindaris track OKRs and KPIs together? Yes. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, Balanced Scorecard, OGSM, and other frameworks in one platform. You can run KPIs alongside OKRs and see how both connect to the same underlying work. How is Vindaris different from other OKR tools? Most OKR tools track goals in isolation. Vindaris connects goals to traceable work - tasks, projects, and deliverables live in the same system. It is free forever for goal and strategy management, hosted in Germany, and GDPR compliant. What is the best OKR software for a small team? The right OKR software for a small team is one that does not need an administrator. Vindaris is free for up to five people with two integrations, sets up in an afternoon, and connects Key Results to the tasks already running in your tools so nobody has to maintain a second system. For a comparison of the wider market, our independent review of the best OKR software covers eleven platforms. Is Vindaris free OKR software? Yes, free forever for up to five people, including the full canvas and two integrations, with no credit card. Startups typically run their first several quarters entirely on the free plan. Paid plans start when you add more people, more integrations or unlimited AI summaries. How do you track OKRs without weekly check-ins? Connect each Key Result to the tasks and projects delivering it, and progress comes from the work closing rather than from someone typing a percentage. Check-ins still have value for context and decisions, but the number no longer depends on them, so a skipped week does not leave a stale dashboard behind. Does Vindaris sync with Jira and Asana? Yes, in both directions. Vindaris syncs with Jira, Asana, HubSpot, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, Microsoft To Do, Slack and Teams. A ticket closed in Jira moves the Key Result above it in Vindaris, and a comment written in Vindaris reaches the owner inside the tool they already use. No team has to migrate. Why do OKRs fail after the first quarter? Usually because nothing connects the Objectives to the work between plannings. The quarter opens with a good set of OKRs, the work happens somewhere else, and by week three nobody can say which task moves which Key Result. The grading at the end then measures memory rather than progress. Connecting Key Results to real tasks is what keeps the second quarter from being a relaunch. Get started ## Know which Key Results will miss while there is still quarter left. Connect your first tool in 90 seconds. Free forever for OKR management. Start tracking OKRs free No credit card | No migration | No minimum contract © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # EOS Software - Rocks, Scorecards, Issues | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/eos EOS software # Run EOS with Rocks connected to the work that moves them. Vindaris links your Rocks, Scorecard measures and to-dos to the tasks your team already works on, so Level 10 prep writes itself and a slipping Rock surfaces weeks before the quarterly. Free up to 5 users Two integrations free No credit card required Start tracking Rocks free Work Graph KPI at risk Scorecard measure Weekly demos booked is at risk - 4 teammates shipping, owner idle 6 days. Work Graph Task needs attention Hire the second installer - to-do from the last L10, untouched for 9 days . Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Quick answer ## What is EOS software? EOS software supports the Entrepreneurial Operating System: quarterly Rocks, the weekly Scorecard, the Issues list, and the Level 10 meeting that ties them together. Most products in the category model the meeting well. Fewer model what happens to a Rock in the six days between meetings. ### What do entrepreneurial operating system reviews agree on? Reviews of EOS converge on the same reading: the Traction rituals genuinely install discipline, and the weekly Scorecard is the first place that discipline slips, because every number is typed in by a person. Tooling that derives the measurables from real work removes the data entry the reviews complain about while keeping the ritual intact. ### Does Vindaris replace an EOS implementer? No, and it is not trying to. An implementer teaches the method, runs the first quarters, and holds the leadership team to it. Vindaris is the tooling underneath, and it models Rocks, Scorecard measures, Issues and the L10 cadence as the method describes them rather than approximating them with OKR objects. ### How is a Rock different from an OKR? A Rock is a single priority for one quarter with one accountable owner, which EOS enforces deliberately. An OKR is an objective with measurable key results and often several contributors. Rocks are stricter about ownership and looser about measurement; the two coexist fine in one workspace. ### What happens when we outgrow EOS? In a single-framework tool, outgrowing the method means changing product. In Vindaris the framework is a syntax choice, so a product team can adopt OKRs and an acquired division can keep OGSM while the leadership team still runs Rocks, with no migration and no second subscription. ### Can the L10 read live data? Yes, and this is the part most EOS tooling leaves out. When Rocks connect to the tasks delivering them, the on-track round becomes a review of what the Work Graph already flagged rather than a round of self-assessment, and the Issues list fills with things worth discussing. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Your V/TO on one board: company goals at the top, quarterly Rocks beneath them, and the to-dos and synced tasks that actually move each Rock. Click through the live workspace, no signup. Use cases ## Templates an implementer would recognise. EOS is a weekly method, and its tooling is usually a weekly meeting. The moments that decide a quarter sit either side of the L10. The Level 10 Open on the Issues, not on a status round Rock status and Scorecard numbers are already current, so the meeting starts at IDS instead of spending its first twenty minutes collecting what everyone typed. Week seven of the quarter Catch the Rock that will miss A Rock declared on track every week can still be behind. Progress shaded against the plan shows the gap while there are six weeks left to close it. Quarterly Rock setting Set Rocks against real capacity The room commits to seven Rocks because seven feels right. Vindaris shows what each seat is already carrying, so the number is chosen against bandwidth rather than optimism. Two seats, one problem Stop duplicate work before the Issues list The Accountability Chart is meant to prevent two seats solving the same problem and usually catches it late. The team signal reads real activity and names both. The annual planning day Bring the year's actual data, not a memory Last year's Rocks with what each one really delivered, and the to-dos that carried across quarters. Planning starts from the record rather than from the room's recollection. My Priorities One ranked list per seat, across every connected tool. Heatmap Shaded against the plan, so a flat week looks flat. Alignment Canvas Rocks, Scorecard measures and to-dos on one canvas, with owners. Team signal Read from task activity, naming both seats and the shared project. Email alert Delivered on your own schedule, by email, Slack or Teams. The platform ## One connected system, from the V/TO down to a single to-do. Rocks and the work delivering them do not live in separate tools that someone reconciles before the Level 10. In Vindaris they share one model, so the on-track call is a reading rather than a judgement. 01 / Accountability ### One seat, one Rock, one answer EOS is stricter about ownership than any other framework, and Vindaris enforces it structurally: a Rock has exactly one accountable owner, contributors are named separately, and the Accountability Chart maps onto the goal graph rather than sitting beside it. 02 / Connected model ### Rocks and to-dos in one graph Company goals, quarterly Rocks, Scorecard measures and to-dos connect on an open canvas. Rename every level to match the language your leadership team already uses in the room. 03 / The cadence ### The L10 reads, it does not collect Scorecard numbers and Rock status arrive already current, so the weekly meeting spends its time on Issues rather than on a round of self-reported percentages. Step 01 | Alignment Canvas ### Set up your V/TO structure Define your Vision, 3-Year Picture, 1-Year Plan and quarterly Rocks on the Alignment Canvas. The EOS hierarchy maps straight across, from the 10-Year Target down to an individual to-do. - Every level keeps its EOS name, so the room recognises the board. - One Rock can serve two company goals without duplicating it. Step 02 | My Priorities ### Give every seat one list before the L10 Each person opens a single ranked list of the to-dos and Rocks they are accountable for, ordered by what they affect upstream. The segue stops being a memory test and the to-do list stops being rebuilt from scratch each week. - Ranked by the Rock it moves, not by who asked most recently. - Carried-over to-dos surface with their age, which is the number EOS cares about. Step 03 | Heatmap ### See the Scorecard as a quarter, not a row of weeks The Heatmap shades every Rock and measure by progress against plan, so a number that has been off for three weeks looks different from one that missed once. Click any tile to drill into the work underneath it. - A tile changes colour before the trend is obvious in the weekly row. - Drill from a red measure straight into the stalled to-dos behind it. Step 04 | Team signal ### Catch two seats solving the same problem The Work Graph reads what people are actually working on and flags when two seats have quietly picked up the same problem, which is the failure the Accountability Chart is meant to prevent and rarely catches on its own. - Surfaced from real task activity, not from someone noticing in the L10. - Names both seats and the shared project, so the Issue writes itself. Try step 01 ### Type the V/TO as the room said it. The Vision and the quarter's Rocks usually exist as sentences before they exist as a structure. Write them out, tag each Rock and to-do with @, and the board builds itself around the seats that own them. Strategy Narrative Write your @strategy, @goals, @kpis, @projects and @tasks and automatically map them on the Alignment Canvas in one click. Type @ to mention Type your strategy here... Mention existing expand into the European enterprise market grow ARR to $10M land 25 enterprise logos build a repeatable outbound motion launch the partner & referral program hire two enterprise account executives Create new New Goal… New KPI… New Project… New Task… Start from an example: Growth & expansion Cost leadership Create my strategy canvas See Alignment Canvas Alignment Canvas Create my strategy canvas Back to the editor Risk alerts ## Four of the twelve alerts, in EOS terms. The Work Graph reads the edges between your Rocks and the to-dos beneath them. These four are the ones that turn an L10 Issues list from a memory exercise into a reading. Task overdue To-do carried for three L10s running A to-do that keeps rolling forward is an Issue the meeting has not named yet. The alert arrives by email before the meeting rather than during the segue. Duplicate effort Two seats on the same problem Two people updated work on the same project this week and neither knows about the other. This is the failure the Accountability Chart is meant to prevent and rarely catches on its own. A Rock you support is at risk Your work feeds a Rock that is slipping Contributors hear about a Rock going off track without waiting for the owner to raise it, which is usually the week after they could have done something. BAU crowding out Rocks 68% of effort on run-the-business work Quarterly Rocks lose to the day job quietly. The Heatmap shows the split by seat, so the trade-off is a decision rather than a discovery. Email alert Arrives before the L10, so the Issues list is already written. Team alert Read from real task activity, naming both seats and the shared project. Work Graph Sent to contributors, not only to the accountable seat. Heatmap The split by seat, so the conversation has a number in it. Twelve deterministic and AI-driven alerts watching for slipping work, broken routines and misaligned focus. Built for the way you work ## Your framework, your language, your data in Europe. Vindaris runs EOS as the method describes it, and does not quietly push you toward OKRs the moment a team outside the leadership group wants a different syntax. ### Runs EOS without locking you into it Vindaris ships without a prescribed methodology, so the Rocks, Scorecard and Issues stay named the way EOS names them. One workspace can hold Rocks for the leadership team alongside OKRs for the product organization, which matters the moment a company grows past pure EOS. OKRs EOS OGSM KPIs SMART Goals Hoshin Kanri Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations. Free covers a full EOS implementation for a leadership team of five: Rocks, Scorecard, Issues and to-dos, with two integrations. Pay when the seats or the connected tools grow past that. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All views: Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio and Task Board - Two integrations of your choice - Up to four additional members - Five ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign up for free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - Everything in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries and alignment suggestions - Up to ten users in one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff or full-org deployments. - Everything in Connect - Unlimited users in one organization - Direct human support, 24h response - Human-led onboarding Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Free tooling ## Templates an implementer would recognise. Real PowerPoint files and browser tools that run without an account. Built to work alongside an implementer rather than to replace one. PowerPoint template EOS V/TO The Vision/Traction Organizer as a working file, ready to fill in with your leadership team. Open it → PowerPoint template Level 10 agenda The full 90-minute L10 structure, timed, with the IDS block where it belongs. Open it → Free tool KPI Pace Checker Enter a start value, a target and a date, and see whether the current pace lands the number. Open it → All free tools All templates The strategy execution gap whitepaper Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is EOS software? EOS software helps leadership teams run the Entrepreneurial Operating System by tracking Rocks, Scorecards, Issues, and To-Dos. Vindaris connects each of these EOS components to the real tasks your team works on every day, giving you a live view of Traction. How do EOS Rocks connect to daily tasks? In Vindaris, each Rock links to the projects and tasks driving it in tools like Jira, Microsoft Planner, or Google Tasks. Rock progress updates automatically from task completion, so your leadership team sees real status rather than self-reported updates. Can Vindaris replace EOS One? Vindaris covers the same EOS components - Rocks, Scorecards, Issues, and To-Dos - but adds a layer most EOS tools lack: traceability to actual work. Goals and tasks live in one system, hosted in Germany and GDPR compliant. Does Vindaris support the EOS Scorecard? Yes. You can build your EOS Scorecard with measurables that track against real data sources. Vindaris supports KPIs alongside Rocks and Issues, so your weekly Scorecard reflects actual business performance rather than manually entered numbers. Get started ## Know which Rocks will slip before the next Level 10. Connect your first tool in 90 seconds. Free forever for EOS management. Start tracking Rocks free No credit card | No migration | No minimum contract © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # OGSM Software - Link Strategy to Work | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/ogsm OGSM software # OGSM software that keeps the plan connected to the work. Vindaris links every Objective, Goal, Strategy and Measure to the projects and tasks carrying them, so the plan reports on itself instead of waiting for the next update round. Free up to 5 users Two integrations free No credit card required Start your OGSM free Work Graph KPIs at risk of missing target 3 Measures will miss target at the current pace: Market share, Dealer coverage, Repeat rate. Work Graph Project blocked by dependency Dealer onboarding wave 2 is blocked by "Pricing model sign-off". Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Quick answer ## What is OGSM? OGSM is a one-page planning framework: an Objective in words, Goals that make it measurable, Strategies describing how you will get there, and Measures that tell you whether each Strategy is working. Its discipline is the single page. Its weakness is that a page has no room for the work underneath. ### How is OGSM different from OKR? OGSM separates the qualitative Objective from the quantitative Goals and puts the how, the Strategies, on the same page as the what. OKRs collapse those into objectives and key results. OGSM suits companies that want the strategic choice visible; OKRs suit companies that want the target visible. ### What goes in the Measures row? Leading indicators for each Strategy rather than restatements of the Goals. The most common OGSM mistake is filling the Measures row with the same numbers already in the Goals row, which leaves you unable to tell whether a Strategy is failing or simply has not been executed yet. ### Does OGSM work below the leadership team? It cascades reasonably: a Strategy at company level becomes an Objective for the team that owns it. The cascade breaks where most frameworks break, at the point where a team's Strategies have to become actual projects, because the one-pager has no room for them. ### Can OGSM be tracked automatically? The Measures can, if the Strategies underneath them connect to real projects. That is what Vindaris adds: the one-pager keeps its structure and gains a layer below it, so a Measure moves when the work delivering its Strategy moves rather than when someone updates the page. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. The one-page plan as a live board: the Objective at the top, Goals and Measures beneath it, and the Strategies with the real projects and tasks carrying them. Click through the live workspace, no signup. Use cases ## The one-pager, before you commit to it. OGSM is strongest at the moment it is written and weakest six months later, when the page still says a Strategy is working and nothing has checked. Writing the one-pager Draft it, then attach the work Build the Objective, Goals, Strategies and Measures on the canvas, then hang the real projects under each Strategy. A Strategy with nothing under it is visible immediately. The monthly measure review Start from a query, not an assembly job Every Measure with its Strategy, its projects and its movement since the last review, in one saved view delivered before the meeting. A Measure stops moving Tell a failing Strategy from an unexecuted one The most useful distinction in OGSM. When a Measure is flat, the alert says whether the work under its Strategy is running and not working, or was never started. The quarterly business review Show the page and what is under it The one-pager stays the artefact leadership reads, with progress on each Strategy shaded by what its projects delivered rather than by what its owner reported. A new market opens Add a Strategy without rewriting the page One Strategy can serve two Goals, and adding one does not mean renumbering everything below it. Contributors see the new work in their own ranked list the same day. Alignment Canvas Each level keeps its OGSM name and its own card type. Data Studio Save any filter as a view and schedule it as a report. Work Graph Names the Measure, the Strategy and the work underneath. Heatmap Click any tile to drill into the work behind it. My Priorities Everything assigned to one person, ranked by upstream impact. The platform ## One page at the top. Four levels underneath it. OGSM earns its keep by fitting on a page, and loses it the moment someone asks what is actually being done about a Strategy that is behind. Vindaris keeps the page and adds the layer below it. 01 / Framework fidelity ### Objective, Goals, Strategies, Measures The four levels keep their names and their relationships rather than being flattened into objectives and key results. A Strategy stays a choice about how, and a Measure stays the proof that the choice is working. 02 / Measures from work ### Leading indicators that lead The most common OGSM mistake is filling the Measures row with restated Goals, which leaves you unable to tell a failing Strategy from an unexecuted one. When Measures read from the projects under each Strategy, the difference is visible. 03 / Two-way sync ### Work stays where it lives Connect HubSpot, Jira, Planner, Asana and Google Tasks. Each Strategy keeps its delivery where it happens, and its Measures move as that work closes rather than as someone updates the one-pager. Step 01 | Alignment Canvas ### Build your OGSM hierarchy Lay the Objective, its Goals, the Strategies chosen to reach them and the Measures proving each one onto a single canvas. The one-pager stays a one-pager; the canvas is what sits behind it. - Each level keeps its OGSM name and its own card type. - One Strategy can serve two Goals without being written twice. Step 02 | Data Studio ### Query the Measures like a database Filter every Goal, Strategy, Measure, project and task in one table, then save the view as a scheduled report. The monthly measure review starts from a query rather than from someone assembling the numbers. - Save any filter as a view and have it delivered before the review. - Compare Measures against the Strategies they belong to, not in isolation. Step 03 | Task Board ### Connect the tools your Strategies run in Plug in HubSpot, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, Asana or Jira. The Strategies on your one-pager gain the projects delivering them, so a Measure has something underneath it to explain a move. - A task closed in Jira closes in Vindaris, and back again. - Every synced item keeps a tag pointing at its source tool, so a Measure can be traced to its Strategy. Step 04 | Work Graph ### Get alerted when Strategies or Measures fall behind The Work Graph watches the projects under each Strategy and flags the moment their pace stops supporting the Measure above them, which is well before the monthly review would have caught it. - A Strategy with no active work is flagged as a choice nobody acted on. - Alerts name the Measure, the Strategy and the specific project. Try step 01 ### One paragraph in, one page out. OGSM is a page because a page forces a choice. Write the Objective, the Goals, the Strategies you picked and how you will know, tag them with @, and the hierarchy is drawn from the argument you just made. Strategy Narrative Write your @strategy, @goals, @kpis, @projects and @tasks and automatically map them on the Alignment Canvas in one click. Type @ to mention Type your strategy here... Mention existing expand into the European enterprise market grow ARR to $10M land 25 enterprise logos build a repeatable outbound motion launch the partner & referral program hire two enterprise account executives Create new New Goal… New KPI… New Project… New Task… Start from an example: Growth & expansion Cost leadership Create my strategy canvas See Alignment Canvas Alignment Canvas Create my strategy canvas Back to the editor Risk alerts ## Four of the twelve alerts, in OGSM terms. The Work Graph reads the edges between the one-pager and the work delivering it. These four separate a Strategy that is failing from one that was never executed, which the page alone cannot do. Strategy with no work A chosen Strategy nobody started The most expensive state in OGSM: a Strategy agreed at planning that no project was ever attached to. It reads as on track because nothing has gone wrong yet. Measures at risk Two Measures below target on one Strategy When several Measures under the same Strategy drift together, the Strategy is the problem rather than the execution. The alert groups them so the pattern is visible. Blocked by dependency A Strategy waiting on another team Cross-team dependencies are where one-page plans quietly stall. The alert names the blocking project and the team holding it. Review update overdue Monthly measure review has no fresh data Rather than chasing owners for numbers before the review, the alert flags the Measures whose underlying work has not moved since the last one. Alignment Canvas Distinguishes an unexecuted Strategy from a failing one. Data Studio Grouped by Strategy, because that is the unit of the decision. Work Graph Names the blocking project and who owns it. Email alert Flags stale Measures instead of chasing every owner. Twelve deterministic and AI-driven alerts watching for slipping work, broken routines and misaligned focus. Built for the way you work ## Your framework, your language, your data in Europe. Vindaris keeps OGSM on one page where it belongs, and adds the layer underneath so a Measure can be traced to the Strategy and the work delivering it. ### Runs OGSM without flattening it Vindaris ships without a prescribed methodology, so Objectives, Goals, Strategies and Measures keep their names and their relationships. A Strategy can feed two Goals, and the same workspace can hold OGSM for the business while a department runs OKRs. OKRs EOS OGSM KPIs SMART Goals Hoshin Kanri Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations. Free covers the whole OGSM structure and the work beneath it for up to 5 people. The one-pager does not become a paid feature at any tier. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All views: Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio and Task Board - Two integrations of your choice - Up to four additional members - Five ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign up for free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - Everything in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries and alignment suggestions - Up to ten users in one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff or full-org deployments. - Everything in Connect - Unlimited users in one organization - Direct human support, 24h response - Human-led onboarding Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Free tooling ## The one-pager, before you commit to it. Real Excel and PowerPoint files and browser tools that run without an account. The one-pager template is the fastest way to test whether OGSM fits your company. PowerPoint template OGSM one-pager Objectives, goals, strategies and measures on a single sheet you can put in front of a board. Open it → PowerPoint template Strategy on a page Compress the plan to one page people can hold in their heads between reviews. Open it → Free tool Framework Selector Answer eight questions and get the framework your company is most likely to keep past quarter one. Open it → All free tools All templates The strategy execution gap whitepaper Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is OGSM software? OGSM software helps organizations structure strategy using the Objective, Goals, Strategies, and Measures framework. Vindaris lets you build your OGSM on one page and connect each Strategy and Measure to the tasks and projects that deliver them. How does OGSM differ from OKRs? OGSM includes an explicit Strategies layer between objectives and measures, making it a good fit for companies that want to document how they will achieve goals, not just what they will measure. Vindaris supports both frameworks, so you can choose whichever fits your planning style. Can Vindaris track OGSM and KPIs together? Yes. Vindaris supports OGSM, OKRs, KPIs, Balanced Scorecard, and other frameworks side by side. You can track Measures from your OGSM alongside operational KPIs in the same workspace. How does Vindaris connect OGSM to work execution? Each Strategy and Measure in your OGSM links to real tasks in Jira, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, or HubSpot. Progress rolls up automatically, so leadership sees whether execution is on track without chasing status updates. Get started ## Know which Measures will miss while the plan can still change. Connect your first tool in 90 seconds. Free forever for OGSM management. Start your OGSM free No credit card | No migration | No minimum contract Last reviewed August 2026 © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # SMART Goals Software - Measurable Framework | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/smart-goals SMART goals # SMART goal software where the measure moves with the work. Vindaris connects every specific, measurable, time-bound goal to the tasks and projects delivering it, so you see a miss coming weeks before the deadline arrives. Free up to 5 users Two integrations free No credit card required Start tracking SMART Goals free Work Graph Goal at risk Cut churn to 3% by 31 December is at risk - the measure has not moved in 3 weeks. Work Graph Task overdue Ship the win-back email sequence is 11 days past its due date. Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Quick answer ## What makes a goal SMART? SMART goals are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-bound. The criteria are forty years old and still the clearest test in goal setting. Two of the five letters are where goals fail in practice, and both fail for the same reason: they are judged once at goal-setting time and never checked again. ### Which part of SMART do teams get wrong? Measurable, usually. A goal with a number attached is not automatically measurable; it is measurable when there is a data source that produces the number without someone deciding what it should be. If a goal's current value comes from a person's estimate, the M is decorative. ### How do you know if a goal is Achievable? By looking at the capacity behind it rather than at the ambition in it. Achievable is a statement about resources, and it can only be assessed if you can see what else the same people are committed to. That is why it is the letter most often assumed rather than tested. ### Are SMART goals better than OKRs? They answer different questions. SMART is a quality test you apply to a goal you have already chosen; OKRs are a structure for choosing and aligning goals across teams. Many teams write OKRs and then run the SMART test over each key result, which is a reasonable use of both. ### How should SMART goals be tracked? From the work, if you want the M to survive the quarter. When a goal connects to the tasks and projects moving it, Measurable becomes a count rather than a claim, and Time-bound gains an early warning because pace against the deadline is visible weeks before the deadline. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Every SMART goal on one board with its measure attached and the projects and tasks actually moving it underneath. Click through the live workspace, no signup. Use cases ## Check a goal in thirty seconds. A SMART goal passes its test once, on the day it is written. These are the five moments afterwards when one of the letters quietly stops being true. Writing the goal Fail the test before the quarter does Draft each goal with its measure, owner, deadline and expected work on one card. A goal missing any of those is visibly incomplete rather than merely well phrased. First check-in Prove the M has a source Point the measure at the connected work that produces it. What was a number someone maintained becomes a count that can be filtered, sorted and scheduled. Four weeks in Discover the A was optimistic Each goal passed Achievable alone. Together with everything else the owner is carrying, they do not, and the ranked list shows the collision while something can still be dropped. Six weeks left Get the warning the deadline cannot give Pace against remaining time rather than against the date. A goal that cannot be reached at its current rate says so while the deadline is still negotiable. The review Read what happened, not what was written Every goal shaded by delivered progress. The conversation opens on the two that moved differently from plan rather than walking the whole list. Alignment Canvas Owner, measure and date are structural fields, not free text. Data Studio Query every goal, task and measure in one view. My Priorities Capacity shown next to commitment, so the trade-off is explicit. Email alert Fires on pace, weeks before it would fire on the date. Heatmap Click any tile to drill into the work behind it. The platform ## The two letters everyone assumes, made checkable. Specific, Relevant and Time-bound are decided once when the goal is written. Measurable and Achievable are claims about the world that keep being true or stop being true all quarter, and almost nothing checks them after the goal-setting meeting. 01 / Measurable ### A number with a source behind it A goal with a figure attached is not measurable; it is measurable when something produces the figure without a person deciding what it should be. Vindaris reads it from the connected work, so the M stops depending on who filled the cell. 02 / Achievable ### Capacity you can actually see Achievable is a statement about resources and it can only be assessed against everything else the same people already committed to. Vindaris tracks bandwidth next to the goal, so over-commitment shows up while there is still time to drop something. 03 / Time-bound ### Pace against the deadline, not just the deadline A date on its own tells you nothing until it arrives. Measuring pace against the remaining time turns Time-bound into an early warning rather than a post-mortem. Step 01 | Alignment Canvas ### Write goals that pass the test Draft each goal with its measure, its owner, its deadline and the work expected to deliver it on one canvas. A goal missing any of those is visible as an incomplete card rather than as a line that reads fine. - Owner, measure and date are structural, not free text. - One goal can sit under two parents without being written twice. Step 02 | Data Studio ### Prove the M with a query, not a claim Point each measure at the connected work that produces it and query the result like a table. What was a number someone maintained becomes a count you can filter, sort and schedule as a report. - Filter every goal, task and measure in one view. - Save the view and have it delivered before the check-in. Step 03 | My Priorities ### Test Achievable against real load Every person sees the goals they own next to everything else assigned to them, ranked by what it affects upstream. An owner carrying four achievable goals and no bandwidth is visible on the list rather than in the retrospective. - Ranked by upstream impact, across every connected tool. - Bandwidth shown next to commitment, so the trade-off is explicit. Step 04 | Work Graph ### Get warned while the deadline can still move The Work Graph measures pace against the time remaining and flags a goal that cannot be reached at its current rate, naming the work responsible. That is the warning a date alone never gives you. - Twelve alert types, each naming the blocking work. - Fires on pace, not on the deadline passing. Try step 01 ### Say the goal, then let it be checked. Write the goal as you would tell a colleague. Tag the measure, the owner and the work with @, and anything the SMART test needs and the sentence did not supply is left visibly blank rather than assumed. Strategy Narrative Write your @strategy, @goals, @kpis, @projects and @tasks and automatically map them on the Alignment Canvas in one click. Type @ to mention Type your strategy here... Mention existing expand into the European enterprise market grow ARR to $10M land 25 enterprise logos build a repeatable outbound motion launch the partner & referral program hire two enterprise account executives Create new New Goal… New KPI… New Project… New Task… Start from an example: Growth & expansion Cost leadership Create my strategy canvas See Alignment Canvas Alignment Canvas Create my strategy canvas Back to the editor Risk alerts ## Four of the twelve alerts, aimed at the letters that fail. Specific and Relevant are settled when the goal is written. Measurable, Achievable and Time-bound keep being true or stop being true all quarter, and these are the alerts that notice. Task needs attention The one task holding a goal still Not every stalled task matters. This one does, because nothing else under the goal can move until it does, and it has been sitting for eleven days. Measure has no source A goal whose number nobody produces The M fails quietly: a goal with a target and no connected work to generate the figure, so the value is whatever the owner last typed. The alert names them before the review does. Deadline at risk Six weeks left, 20% done Pace against the time remaining rather than against the deadline itself. A goal that cannot be reached at its current rate says so while the date can still be renegotiated. Over-committed owner Four achievable goals, one person Each goal passed the Achievable test on its own. Together they do not, and that only becomes visible when capacity sits next to commitment. Work Graph Ranked by what it blocks, so the alert is one task rather than forty. Data Studio Finds goals that are measurable on paper and not in practice. Email alert Fires on pace, which is weeks earlier than firing on the date. Heatmap Achievable is a claim about capacity, so it is checked against capacity. Twelve deterministic and AI-driven alerts watching for slipping work, broken routines and misaligned focus. Built for the way you work ## Your framework, your language, your data in Europe. Vindaris takes SMART seriously on the two letters tools usually skip: Measurable, which needs a real data source, and Achievable, which needs visible capacity. ### Runs SMART goals alongside everything else Vindaris ships without a prescribed methodology, so a SMART goal is a goal with a measure and a date attached. Teams that outgrow the format can move to OKRs or Rocks in the same workspace without a migration or a second tool. OKRs EOS OGSM KPIs SMART Goals Hoshin Kanri Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations. Free covers goals, measures, owners and the connected work that proves them for up to 5 people. Pay when you add people, integrations or AI summaries. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All views: Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio and Task Board - Two integrations of your choice - Up to four additional members - Five ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign up for free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - Everything in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries and alignment suggestions - Up to ten users in one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff or full-org deployments. - Everything in Connect - Unlimited users in one organization - Direct human support, 24h response - Human-led onboarding Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Free tooling ## Check a goal in thirty seconds. Real Excel and PowerPoint files and browser tools that run without an account. Start with the grader if you suspect your goals are not as measurable as they look. Free tool SMART Goal Checker Test a goal against all five letters and see which ones it quietly fails. No signup. Open it → Excel template SMART goal worksheet Draft goals that are specific, measurable and honest about the deadline they carry. Open it → Excel template Weekly check-in A lightweight check-in sheet that surfaces blocked work in minutes rather than in a status round. Open it → All free tools All templates The strategy execution gap whitepaper Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is SMART goal software? SMART goal software helps teams define goals that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound, then track progress against them. Vindaris adds traceability by connecting each SMART goal to the tasks and projects that actually move it forward. How do SMART goals connect to strategy? In Vindaris, SMART goals can nest under higher-level objectives, OKRs, or other strategic frameworks. This creates a clear line of sight from company strategy to individual goals to the daily work delivering them. Can Vindaris track SMART goals and OKRs together? Yes. Vindaris supports SMART goals, OKRs, KPIs, OGSM, Balanced Scorecard, and Hoshin Kanri in one platform. Teams can use whichever framework fits their planning style while leadership keeps a unified view. How does Vindaris make SMART goals traceable? Each SMART goal links to tasks in Jira, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, or HubSpot. Progress updates automatically from task completion, so you always know whether a goal is on track before the deadline arrives. Get started ## Know which goals will miss their deadline while you can still act. Connect your first tool in 90 seconds. Free forever for SMART goal management. Comparing options? See our broader goal management software or goal tracking software . Start tracking SMART goals free No credit card | No migration | No minimum contract © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Balanced Scorecard Software | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/balanced-scorecard # Build your Balanced Scorecard. Connect every measure to the work behind it. Vindaris runs the Balanced Scorecard across all four perspectives and connects each objective, measure, and initiative to the tasks and projects actually moving them. Scorecard status comes from real work, not from numbers someone updates before the review. Build your scorecard free View Prebuilt Demo Schedule Demo Call Free forever | No credit card required | Your team keeps their tools What you can do ## Everything you need to run a Balanced Scorecard connected to real execution. Most Balanced Scorecard tools let you define perspectives and measures but leave them disconnected from daily work, so the numbers are updated by hand before each review. Vindaris keeps every measure and initiative connected to the tasks proving it, through real integrations with HubSpot, Planner, Asana, and Google Tasks. Build all four perspectives Define objectives, measures, and targets across financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. Keep them in one structure instead of four disconnected spreadsheets. Link measures to real data Connect each measure to integrated sources and task progress, so the number you report is the number the work produced - not a value typed in before the meeting. Connect initiatives to the work Strategic initiatives are where a scorecard succeeds or fails. Connect each initiative to the tasks and projects delivering it so you can see whether it is actually moving. Map your strategy Build a strategy map showing how objectives in one perspective drive the next - learning and growth into process, process into customer, customer into financial - in a single alignment view. Spot at-risk objectives early The Work Graph monitors the work behind each objective. When initiatives stall, the objective shows risk weeks before the quarterly review would have surfaced it. Report to the board Build scorecard reports from real data and share them via Slack, Teams, or email. Walk into the review with a scorecard that reflects execution, not a deck assembled the night before. How it works ## From a scorecard on a spreadsheet to a scorecard connected to your team's actual work. Your team keeps working in HubSpot, Planner, Google Tasks, or Asana. Vindaris connects those tasks to your scorecard so measures and initiatives update automatically. 01 Build your scorecard Create objectives, measures, and targets across the four perspectives in the Alignment Canvas. Cascade from the company scorecard down to department and team level. 02 Connect the tools your team works in Plug in HubSpot, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, Asana, or any supported tool. Bidirectional sync pulls tasks and projects into Vindaris while your team stays in their own workflow. 03 Map initiatives and measures to work Vindaris suggests which tasks and projects connect to each measure and initiative based on labels, owners, and structure. Confirm the mapping, and your scorecard is live with real work behind every node. 04 Get alerted when objectives are at risk The Work Graph evaluates the work behind each objective and initiative. When progress stalls, you are notified before it becomes a missed target at the quarterly review. Alignment Canvas ### See how all four perspectives connect into one strategy. Map your scorecard as a strategy map. See how learning and growth objectives drive process, process drives customer, and customer drives financial results, with the work connected at every level. Heatmap ### Spot which scorecard objectives are at risk before the review. Run heatmaps across perspectives and objectives to see which ones have stalled work behind them. Catch a slipping initiative early, not on the day the target is missed. Data Studio ### Build the scorecard report your board actually reads. Assemble scorecard reports from real measure and initiative data. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams, and email, so the review starts from facts instead of a status deck. Why teams switch to Vindaris ## Scorecard tools report measures. Vindaris flags the measures whose initiatives quietly stalled. The gap in most Balanced Scorecard tools is between the measure and the work. You define a clean scorecard across four perspectives. Your team then does the work in HubSpot, Planner, Asana, or their own tools. The scorecard sits in a separate system, updated by hand before each review, and by the time a measure turns red the quarter is usually over. Vindaris closes that gap. You map perspectives, measures and initiatives down to the real tasks delivering them, synced bidirectionally from your work tools. When the work behind an objective stalls, that is execution risk , and the scorecard flags it automatically. Your strategy reviews become decision meetings because the scorecard is already true. And because Vindaris is framework-agnostic, your scorecard can sit above teams running OKRs without forcing everyone onto one method. See how that fits into broader strategy execution management , or explore the full goal management and goal tracking capabilities underneath it. Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations Start free with full Balanced Scorecard and strategy management. Add two integrations to sync tasks. Pay only when you add more than 4 people, need more integrations, or more AI summaries. Free €0/forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10/user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20/user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template Balanced Scorecard The four-perspective scorecard as a ready-to-use spreadsheet. Playbook Choose a goal framework OKRs, EOS, OGSM, or none: pick the framework your company will actually keep. From the blog Balanced Scorecard, compared Why the scorecard keeps getting measured against newer frameworks, and when it wins. ## Know which measures will miss before the strategy review does. Connect your first tool in 90 seconds. Free forever for goal management. Build your scorecard free No credit card | No migration | No minimum contract © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Hoshin Kanri Software - Plan to Execution | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/hoshin-kanri Hoshin Kanri # Hoshin Kanri with the cascade connected to real work. Vindaris links breakthrough objectives, annual objectives and improvement priorities to the tasks executing them, so catchball produces commitments the system can actually track. Free up to 5 users Two integrations free No credit card required Start your Hoshin plan free Work Graph KPIs at risk of missing target 2 targets will miss at the current pace: Changeover time, First-pass yield. Work Graph BAU is crowding out strategy Run-the-business work is 78% of effort (target 60%). Review what can be deprioritised. Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Quick answer ## What is Hoshin Kanri? Hoshin Kanri is a strategy deployment method built around a small number of breakthrough objectives, an X-matrix that connects them to annual objectives, improvement priorities and metrics, and catchball, the negotiation that pushes each level down through the organization. It is the most rigorous framework in common use and the least forgiving of stale data. ### What is the X-matrix for? It forces every element of the plan to declare its relationships: which annual objective serves which breakthrough, which improvement priority serves which objective, which metric proves it. The matrix is valuable precisely because filling it in honestly exposes the priorities that connect to nothing. ### What are the four sections of the X-matrix? Read clockwise from the bottom: breakthrough objectives (3-5 years), annual objectives (this year's slice), top-level improvement priorities (the initiatives), and targets to improve (the metrics). Owners attach to the priorities, and correlation marks link each layer to the next. A free X-matrix template with all four sections and a catchball log is in the templates library. ### How does catchball actually work? Each level proposes how it will contribute, the level above responds, and the two iterate until both commit. It is slower than cascading and considerably more durable, because the team that has to deliver has argued about the target rather than received it. ### Why does Hoshin Kanri fail in practice? Almost always for the same reason: the matrix is built in a planning cycle and then never reflects reality again. An X-matrix is a set of claimed relationships, and if nothing checks whether the improvement work is moving, the matrix stays green while the deployment quietly stops. ### Can Hoshin run alongside OKRs? Yes, and in large organizations it usually has to. Hoshin tends to live at corporate and manufacturing level while product and commercial teams run OKRs. Vindaris holds both natively, so the breakthrough objectives can read progress from teams that never touch the X-matrix. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. The Hoshin cascade on one board: breakthrough objectives at the top, annual objectives and improvement priorities beneath, and the work each level actually depends on. Click through the live workspace, no signup. Use cases ## Start with the matrix on a page. Hoshin is rigorous on paper and fragile in practice, and it breaks in the same three places every year: the handoff between levels, the day job, and the review that comes too late. Catchball Negotiate on the object, not in a thread Each level proposes its contribution against the objective itself, and the exchange stays attached to it. A year later the commitment and the reasoning are still in the same place. The monthly gemba See which level stopped deploying Deployment fails at whichever level nobody is watching. Shaded by progress to plan per team and objective, the level that went quiet is a block of colour. An improvement priority stalls Name the block, not the symptom A priority behind plan is a symptom. The alert names the blocking work and the level holding it, which is the thing the review would otherwise spend an hour finding. The half-year check Query the matrix, do not re-derive it Every breakthrough objective with its annual objectives, improvement priorities and metrics in one filterable view, current because the work under it is connected. Rebuilding the X-matrix Carry forward what actually moved Next year's matrix starts from the improvement work that delivered and the priorities that never got capacity, rather than from a blank grid and a good memory. Alignment Canvas Each level keeps its Hoshin name and its own card type. Heatmap A tile per team and objective, shaded against the plan. Work Graph Names the blocking work and the level responsible. Data Studio Query every objective, priority and metric like a database. My Priorities Ranked by what it affects upstream, across every connected tool. The platform ## The X-matrix, with the deployment underneath it. Hoshin is the most rigorous framework in common use and the least forgiving of stale data. A matrix of claimed relationships is only worth the freshness of what it claims, and nothing in a spreadsheet checks that. 01 / Traceability ### Every relationship holds a live edge The X-matrix declares which annual objective serves which breakthrough, which improvement priority serves which objective, and which metric proves it. In Vindaris each of those is an edge with real work under it, so a claimed relationship can be checked rather than assumed. 02 / Catchball ### The negotiation leaves a record Each level proposes how it will contribute and the level above responds. Vindaris keeps that exchange attached to the objective rather than in a thread nobody can find, so the commitment and the reasoning stay together for the year the plan runs. 03 / Two-way sync ### Work stays where it lives Connect HubSpot, Jira, Planner, Asana and Google Tasks. The improvement work under each breakthrough objective stays with the team that owns it, and the X-matrix reads its state directly. Step 01 | Alignment Canvas ### Build your Hoshin hierarchy Lay out breakthrough objectives, annual objectives, improvement priorities and the metrics that prove them, with the relationships between them drawn rather than implied by a grid position. - Each level keeps its Hoshin name and its own card type. - One improvement priority can serve two annual objectives. Step 02 | Task Board ### Connect the tools the improvement work runs in Plug in HubSpot, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, Asana or Jira. Catchball settles who owns what; the sync then shows whether the improvement work that was agreed is actually moving. - A task closed in Jira closes in Vindaris, and back again. - Every synced item keeps a tag pointing at its source tool, so the X-matrix can be audited end to end. Step 03 | Heatmap ### See deployment across every level at once Hoshin fails quietly at the level nobody is watching. The Heatmap shades each team and objective by progress against plan, so a level that stopped deploying is visible as a block of colour rather than as an absence in a report. - A tile per team, per objective, shaded by progress to plan. - Click through to the improvement work that stopped moving. Step 04 | Email alert ### Keep the review honest between reviews Owners get the deployment status of their own objectives on their own schedule, by email, Slack or Teams. The annual review stops being the first moment anyone notices a priority has not moved since spring. - Delivered on the owner's cadence, not the reporting calendar. - Names the priority, the gap and the work that caused it. Try step 01 ### Capture catchball as it was actually agreed. The commitment a level makes is a sentence before it is a cell. Write it as it was said, tag the objective and the improvement priority with @, and the matrix records the reasoning alongside the relationship. Strategy Narrative Write your @strategy, @goals, @kpis, @projects and @tasks and automatically map them on the Alignment Canvas in one click. Type @ to mention Type your strategy here... Mention existing expand into the European enterprise market grow ARR to $10M land 25 enterprise logos build a repeatable outbound motion launch the partner & referral program hire two enterprise account executives Create new New Goal… New KPI… New Project… New Task… Start from an example: Growth & expansion Cost leadership Create my strategy canvas See Alignment Canvas Alignment Canvas Create my strategy canvas Back to the editor Risk alerts ## Four of the twelve alerts, in Hoshin terms. The Work Graph reads the edges the X-matrix declares. A matrix is a set of claimed relationships; these four alerts are what checking them looks like in practice. Blocked by dependency Improvement priority waiting on another level Hoshin deployment fails at the handoff between levels more than anywhere else. The alert names the blocking work and the level holding it. BAU crowding out improvement Improvement work squeezed to 11% of effort The classic Hoshin failure: breakthrough objectives agreed in the annual cycle, then starved by the day job. The Heatmap shows the split per team before the year is lost. Catchball unresolved A priority nobody accepted downward Catchball that never closed leaves an objective with no owner at the level below. On the canvas it shows as an edge that stops rather than as a filled cell in a grid. Goal behind Annual objective off pace at the half year Pace measured against the time left in the annual cycle, delivered on the owner's own schedule rather than waiting for the review that would have found it. Work Graph Names the blocking work and the level responsible. Heatmap Per team, so the level that stopped deploying is visible. Alignment Canvas An unclosed negotiation is visible as a broken edge. Email alert Sent on the owner's cadence, not the reporting calendar. Twelve deterministic and AI-driven alerts watching for slipping work, broken routines and misaligned focus. Built for the way you work ## Your framework, your language, your data in Europe. Vindaris supports Hoshin as practised rather than as diagrammed, including catchball across levels and the awkward reality that not every level uses the X-matrix. ### Runs the Hoshin cascade at any depth Vindaris ships without a prescribed methodology and without a fixed number of levels, so a cascade can run from breakthrough objective to shop-floor task without being flattened. The same workspace can hold Hoshin for operations while a commercial team runs OKRs. OKRs EOS OGSM KPIs SMART Goals Hoshin Kanri Pricing ## Free forever, including two integrations. Free covers the full Hoshin hierarchy, catchball and deployment tracking for up to 5 people. Pay when you deploy to more levels or connect more tools. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All views: Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio and Task Board - Two integrations of your choice - Up to four additional members - Five ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign up for free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - Everything in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries and alignment suggestions - Up to ten users in one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff or full-org deployments. - Everything in Connect - Unlimited users in one organization - Direct human support, 24h response - Human-led onboarding Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Free tooling ## Start with the matrix on a page. Real Excel and PowerPoint files and browser tools that run without an account, including an X-matrix you can fill in before deciding anything. PowerPoint template Strategy on a page Compress the plan to one page people can hold in their heads between reviews. Open it → Excel template Balanced Scorecard The four-perspective scorecard as a ready-to-use spreadsheet with rollups already wired. Open it → Free tool Framework Selector Answer eight questions and get the framework your company is most likely to keep past quarter one. Open it → All free tools All templates The strategy execution gap whitepaper Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is Hoshin Kanri software? Hoshin Kanri software helps organizations deploy strategic plans from top-level breakthrough objectives down to team-level improvement priorities. Vindaris supports the full Hoshin process and connects each priority to real tasks so progress is always traceable. How does Hoshin Kanri differ from OKRs? Hoshin Kanri focuses on a small number of breakthrough objectives deployed through catchball alignment across all levels of the organization. OKRs tend to be shorter-cycle and broader in scope. Vindaris supports both, so you can use whichever fits your planning cadence. Can Vindaris support the X-matrix? Yes. Vindaris lets you map breakthrough objectives to annual objectives, improvement priorities, and measurable targets in a connected structure. Because tasks link directly to priorities, your X-matrix reflects live progress from real work. How does Vindaris connect breakthrough objectives to daily work? Each improvement priority links to tasks in Jira, Microsoft Planner, Google Tasks, or HubSpot. Task completion rolls up through annual objectives to breakthrough goals automatically, giving leadership a live view of strategic execution. Get started ## Know where deployment is drifting before the annual review does. Connect your first tool in 90 seconds. Free forever for Hoshin Kanri management. Start your Hoshin plan free No credit card | No migration | No minimum contract © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Strategy Execution Software Pricing | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/pricing Pricing # Simple pricing, built to grow with you Start free, no credit card needed. Connect your tools when you're ready and unlock integrations with your team. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members to your organization - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro Compare plans ## Everything side by side Understand exactly what each plan includes before you decide. Free Connect Pro Core Goals & OKRs Strategy alignment map Tasks & initiatives (native) Progress dashboards Team members Up to 5 Up to 10 Unlimited Integrations External integrations (HubSpot, Jira, Planner…) 2 All All Two-way sync AI & Support AI risk summaries 5/month Unlimited Unlimited Human support & onboarding — Priority support (24h response) — — FAQ ## Common questions Everything you need to know before getting started. Is the Free plan really free forever? Yes. The Free plan is not a trial - it is a permanent tier with no expiration date. You can manage your full strategy, goals, and native work items inside Vindaris at no cost, for as long as you like. Can I upgrade or downgrade at any time? Yes. You can upgrade, downgrade, or cancel at any time. If you downgrade from Connect or Pro to Free, your integrations will pause but all your data, goals, and history are preserved. You will not lose anything. Where is my data stored? All data is hosted exclusively in Germany on Hetzner infrastructure in Nuremberg (DE-NBG). No data leaves the EU. We are fully GDPR-compliant. Read more on our Security page and GDPR page . Do you offer discounts for annual billing? Annual billing is available at a discounted rate (equivalent to 2 months free). You can switch to annual billing in your workspace billing settings at any time. Get started ## Align your strategy and your work, in the same place No credit card. No time limit. Just clarity on what matters and whether you're on track. Sign Up for Free Talk to sales © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept --- # Integrations - Sync Goals With the Tools You Use | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/integrations Integrations # Integrations deep enough to see execution risks. You map strategy, goals and KPIs in Vindaris. Integrations bring in the projects, tasks and Slack conversations beneath them - not just a progress percentage - so the Work Graph sees where effort actually goes and where it doesn't. Every integration feeds the Work Graph at task level, with a source tag on every item. Microsoft Excel KPI Sync Pull KPI values from any spreadsheet cell. Bind a cell in a KPI's settings and Vindaris syncs its value automatically - no manual copy-paste, no stale dashboards. See how it works → HubSpot CRM Tasks & Metrics Sync CRM tasks two ways, notes included, and feed revenue KPIs from a live count, sum, or average over any HubSpot object. See how it works → Slack Conversations & Notifications Catch conversations that contain decisions or commitments and turn them into tracked projects. Get notified when goals shift, check-ins are due, or progress updates land. See how it works → Gmail Email to Actions Turn emails into tracked actions. When someone sends a request or commits to a deliverable, capture it as a task mapped to the goal it supports. See how it works → Google Tasks Bi-directional Task Sync Two-way sync keeps Google Tasks and Vindaris in lockstep. Every task maps to the goal it moves forward, so individual work rolls up into strategic progress. See how it works → Microsoft To Do Bi-directional Task Sync Sync To Do lists bidirectionally so every personal task maps to the objective it supports. Updates flow both ways - finish a task in either tool and both reflect it. See how it works → Asana Bi-directional Task Sync Bidirectional sync maps Asana projects and tasks to strategic objectives. Every piece of work connects to the goal it advances, and progress rolls up automatically. See how it works → ClickUp Bi-directional Task Sync Two-way sync connects ClickUp tasks and lists to your goals. Move a task in ClickUp and Vindaris updates; adjust a goal in Vindaris and ClickUp reflects it. See how it works → Jira Bi-directional Task Sync Sync epics, sprints, and issues bidirectionally so engineering work maps to product objectives. Every ticket connects to the strategy it serves. See how it works → Microsoft Teams Conversations & Notifications Surface conversations that contain decisions or action items and turn them into tracked work. Get goal updates, check-in reminders, and progress notifications in your channels. See how it works → Fireflies.ai Meeting Transcripts Import meeting transcripts and let Vindaris extract action items or KPI updates discussed in the call. Decisions made in meetings become tracked work automatically. See how it works → Otter.ai Meeting Transcripts Pull Otter.ai transcripts into Vindaris and surface the commitments buried in the conversation. Every action item lands as a task against the goal it supports. See how it works → Power BI KPI Sync Pull KPI values from Power BI dataset measures and sync them daily. Link a measure from any KPI's settings and the number stays current without manual updates. See how it works → Microsoft Planner Bi-directional Task Sync Bidirectional sync connects Planner tasks and buckets to your strategic goals. Work assigned in Planner maps to the objectives it advances, with progress flowing both ways. See how it works → Granola Meeting Notes Import Granola meeting notes and let Vindaris pull out decisions and commitments made in the room. What got agreed becomes a tracked task against the goal it serves. See how it works → Notion Docs & Wiki Sync Link a Notion database of projects or OKRs and Vindaris keeps status in sync. Teams keep documenting in Notion, and progress rolls up to the goals above it. See how it works → Linear Bi-directional Issue Sync Sync Linear issues and cycles bidirectionally so engineering work maps to the objectives it serves. Ship a fix in Linear and the goal above it updates automatically. monday.com Bi-directional Task Sync Two-way sync connects monday.com boards and items to your goals. Update a status in monday.com and Vindaris reflects it, with no manual reporting required. See how it works → Salesforce CRM Tasks & Metrics Bind a KPI to a SOQL aggregate and Vindaris reads pipeline or revenue straight from Salesforce every day, with the history to judge pace. See how it works → Don't see your tool? ## Request an integration We prioritise integrations based on customer demand. Let us know what you use and we'll add it to the roadmap. Request an integration Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What tools does Vindaris integrate with? Vindaris integrates with HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Asana, ClickUp, monday.com, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Gmail, Google Tasks, Microsoft To Do, Microsoft Planner, Microsoft Excel, Power BI, Notion, Linear, Granola, Fireflies.ai, and Otter.ai, with more connectors on the way. Task and project tools sync bidirectionally, so changes flow both ways - update a task in Jira and it reflects in Vindaris, or adjust a goal in Vindaris and your team sees it in their daily tool. Is the integration sync real-time? Yes. Vindaris syncs bidirectionally and live. When someone completes a task in Asana or moves a Jira ticket, that change shows up in Vindaris automatically - no manual refresh, no nightly batch job. Do my teams need to change their workflow? No. Teams keep using the tools they already know. Vindaris maps their existing work to strategic goals in the background, so leadership gets visibility without forcing anyone onto a new platform or changing how day-to-day work gets done. Do I need to migrate my data to connect a tool? No. You authenticate, select the projects, boards, or lists you want to connect, and Vindaris starts syncing. Your existing tasks and progress come through as-is - no data migration required. © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Viva Goals Alternative After Retirement | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/viva-goals-alternative Viva Goals Alternative Goal-layer architecture # Viva Goals is gone. The architecture was always the problem. Most replacements sell the same thing in a new wrapper: a goal layer floating above the work. Vindaris reads the work instead of asking people to retype it. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Microsoft retired Viva Goals on December 31, 2025. Existing customers had to export their objectives and move to another system. Microsoft pointed customers toward partner solutions rather than a direct in-house replacement, which is why most teams treated it as a category re-evaluation rather than a like-for-like swap. Where Viva Goals stops ## It did not fail on features. It failed on where the status came from. Every post-mortem cites low adoption and weak integration, but those are symptoms. Viva Goals was a goal-syntax tracker sitting on top of Microsoft 365, reporting on strategy with no structural connection to the work happening in Planner, Teams or Jira. Every post-mortem on Viva Goals cites low adoption and poor integration with daily work. Those are symptoms. The root cause is architectural: Viva Goals was a goal-syntax tracker sitting on top of Microsoft 365, reporting on strategy with no structural connection to the work happening in Planner, Teams, Azure DevOps, or wherever your people actually spent their day. The result was predictable. Goal check-ins became a separate ritual. Teams updated OKRs as a reporting exercise, disconnected from the work that was or was not moving them. Leadership read green dashboards while initiatives quietly stalled. The system reported what people told it, and it had no way to tell them what was happening. The structural gap Goals without traceable work are theater. While goal-tracking and work-tracking live in separate systems, joined by integrations, manual updates and weekly check-ins, leadership never gets a reliable view of whether effort matches outcome. The gap between them is where strategy quietly dies. How it broke, every quarter 01 Check-in day arrives Owners retype what Planner already knows. 02 The update gets skipped A ritual that adds no information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green Last reported status is the only status there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Sat inside Microsoft 365, so licensing and identity were handled. - Teams integration put check-ins where people already worked. - Clean OKR modelling, easy to explain to a first-time team. - Reasonable connectors for metric values from Microsoft sources. ### Where teams hit the limit - Retired on 31 December 2025, so migration is no longer optional. - Check-ins became a ritual disconnected from the work. - Dashboards showed green while initiatives quietly stalled. - The system could not observe anything on its own. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## Most replacements repeat the same mistake. Goal-layer model Viva Goals and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams update goals as a reporting exercise. - Integrations move data, not traceable links between effort and outcome. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - Retired 31 December 2025, so the decision is already forced. Work Graph model Vindaris - Progress derived from Planner, Teams and the rest of the stack, not typed into a form. - No check-in ritual to rebuild in the replacement tool. - Risk flagged from stalled work before a dashboard would show it. - Any framework, so the migration is not locked to OKRs. - A product whose roadmap is not a strategic side bet. ## Viva Goals sat on Microsoft 365. It never read it. Viva Goals modelled objectives and key results well enough, and it lived inside the Microsoft tenant, which solved identity and licensing on day one. What it never had was a representation of the work in Planner, Teams, Azure DevOps or anywhere else, and that is the reason the check-ins felt like overhead. Object Viva Goals Vindaris Central object The objective and its check-in The task and its edges up to the goal Relationship to Microsoft 365 Hosted alongside it, reading almost nothing Bidirectional sync with Planner, Teams, Google, Jira Progress source The value the owner enters at check-in Task state in the connected tools Risk detection None Pace, focus and capacity against plan Current status Retired December 31, 2025 Actively developed, EU hosted The lesson from the retirement is worth keeping. Viva Goals did not fail for lack of features or for lack of distribution; it had both, and it still went unused, because a tool that asks people to retype what another system already knows never survives contact with a busy quarter. Any replacement chosen on feature comparison alone is likely to fail the same way. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Viva Goals ## The migration you already have to do, done once. Viva Goals is gone, so the question is not whether to move but what to move onto. This is the one moment where changing the architecture costs nothing extra. 01 Bring in your exported objectives Most teams exported to spreadsheet before the December 2025 shutdown. Import that file as-is. Objectives, key results, owners and current values carry over, and nothing needs rewriting even if you want a different framework later. 02 Connect Planner and Teams first This is the step Viva Goals never had. Planner tasks and Teams activity sync bidirectionally, so the work your organization was already doing inside Microsoft 365 becomes visible from inside the goals that work is meant to move. 03 Add the tools outside the Microsoft stack Most organizations that ran Viva Goals also run Jira, Asana, HubSpot or Google somewhere. Connect those too. Viva Goals could not see them at all, which is a large part of why its dashboards were incomplete. 04 Do not rebuild the check-in The strongest temptation in this migration is to port the weekly check-in into the new tool, because it is familiar. It was the symptom. With work connected, the update has no information left to add. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Viva Goals, feature by feature. Comparing a retired product on features is not very useful, so this compares what each one knows about the work. That is the row Viva Goals lost on, and it is the row most of its replacements also lose on. Feature Vindaris Viva Goals How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Check-ins entered by goal owners, with basic connectors for some metrics. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKR-first, with KPI support layered on. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer. Work stayed in Planner, Teams, Azure DevOps and elsewhere. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. None. Status was whatever the last check-in said. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Dashboards inside Microsoft 365 and Teams. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Objective owner, with shared objectives common. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. Retired December 31, 2025. No longer available. Best fit Teams replacing Viva Goals who do not want the same architecture in a new wrapper. No longer applicable. The product reached end of life. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## A retired Microsoft SKU, or a published price. Viva Goals was licensed as part of Viva until it was withdrawn, so the comparison is really between what you were paying inside a bundle and what a dedicated product costs. Plan Viva Goals Vindaris Free tier No longer available. Retired December 31, 2025. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Was licensed within Microsoft Viva, standalone or bundled. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Not applicable. The product reached end of life. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Was bundled, so the goals component was rarely priced separately. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Annual, through Microsoft licensing. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris publishes every tier: free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, EUR 10 per user per month for Connect, EUR 20 for Pro, with data hosted in Europe. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered When was Microsoft Viva Goals retired? Microsoft retired Viva Goals on December 31, 2025. Existing customers had to export their objectives and move to another system. Microsoft pointed customers toward partner solutions rather than a direct in-house replacement, which is why most teams treated it as a category re-evaluation rather than a like-for-like swap. What is the best Viva Goals alternative? It depends on what you want to change. If you want the same model in a new wrapper, several goal trackers will do it. If the reason Viva Goals never stuck was that check-ins felt disconnected from real work, then the replacement needs a native work layer. Vindaris maps strategy, goals and KPIs down to every project and task, so progress comes from the work itself. Why did Viva Goals fail? Adoption and integration are the reasons usually cited, but both trace back to architecture. Viva Goals tracked goals in a layer above Microsoft 365 with no structural link to the work in Planner, Teams or Azure DevOps, so keeping it current was a separate ritual. Rituals that add no information get skipped, and once they are skipped the dashboard is wrong. Can I migrate from Viva Goals to Vindaris? Yes. Bring your exported objectives and key results into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM and hybrid structures, so nothing needs rewriting. Your team keeps working in Microsoft Planner, Teams and the rest of their tools, which Vindaris connects to through bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Replacing Viva Goals is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Quantive Alternative After WorkBoard | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/quantive-alternative Quantive Alternative Goal-layer architecture # Quantive tracks percent complete. Not the work behind it. A mature enterprise OKR suite that reads check-ins rather than the tasks and conversations beneath the goal. Vindaris reads the work. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Quantive, formerly Gtmhub, was acquired by WorkBoard in 2025 as part of a consolidation of the enterprise OKR market. For existing customers this raises the usual acquisition questions: product migration, re-contracting, and a roadmap now controlled by a different company. Many teams treat it as the natural moment to re-evaluate the category rather than the vendor. Where Quantive stops ## A deep OKR suite, fed by a shallow signal. Quantive built one of the most complete OKR feature sets in the category, and enterprises adopted it for good reasons. Progress still resolves to percent complete from a check-in, so the tasks and Slack threads underneath the goal stay outside the model. Quantive, formerly Gtmhub, was one of the more technically capable OKR platforms on the market. Good API coverage, a real integration marketplace, and a data-oriented approach to key results that suited teams with analysts. WorkBoard acquired it in 2025 to consolidate the enterprise OKR market. Acquisitions in this category follow a familiar pattern. The acquired product is maintained for twelve to eighteen months, then merged into the acquirer's platform. Features get rationalized, pricing is renegotiated, and the roadmap answers to a company you did not choose. The product you bought is rarely the product you have two years later. If you are already re-evaluating, that is the moment to ask whether the replacement should differ structurally rather than cosmetically. The structural gap Quantive and WorkBoard share one architectural limitation. Both are goal-tracking layers. They store objectives, collect reported progress, and render dashboards. Neither carries a native work layer, so the effort that should prove whether a goal is being met lives in Jira, Asana, Planner or a spreadsheet. Merging two goal trackers produces a larger goal tracker. How it broke, every quarter 01 Check-in day arrives Owners retype what Jira already knows. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Mature, complete enterprise OKR feature set. - Strong alignment and cascading across large orgs. - Long integration list and flexible reporting. - Well understood by consultants and OKR coaches. ### Where teams hit the limit - Progress resolves to a percentage from a check-in. - No task-level model beneath the key result. - Acquisition and product consolidation created roadmap uncertainty. - Feature depth increases the cost of keeping data current. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## Feature depth does not fix the data source. Goal-layer model Quantive and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams update goals as a reporting exercise. - Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - Roadmap direction changed after acquisition. Work Graph model Vindaris - A roadmap that is not being merged into an acquirer's platform. - A native work layer, not connectors that move key-result values without context. - Published pricing and a free tier, so re-evaluation costs nothing. - Risk detected from task movement rather than dashboard thresholds. - Configuration that does not require an owner to keep it accurate. ## Quantive models the objective. It does not model the task. Quantive, formerly Gtmhub, was the most data-oriented product in the category. Its insight boards and connector marketplace could pull a key-result value from almost anywhere. The architecture treats work as a data source rather than as a modelled object, which is the distinction that survived the acquisition. Object Quantive Vindaris Central object The objective, with connected metric feeds The task, and the edges up to the goal What a connector moves A number Tasks, owners, state and the relationships between them Behind a key-result value The query that produced it The projects and tasks that produced the outcome Risk signal A threshold crossed on a reported number Pace, focus and capacity against plan Upkeep An owner maintaining connectors and insight boards Sync runs itself once the tools are connected Pulling a number from a warehouse tells you the metric moved. It does not tell you which work moved it, which is the question a quarterly review actually turns on. Vindaris syncs the work itself, so the objective and the delivery are the same graph rather than a metric and its source. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Quantive ## Bring the OKR tree. Leave the check-in behind. Existing customers are facing a migration either way. This one ends somewhere with published pricing and a roadmap that is not owned by a competitor. 01 Export objectives and key results from Quantive Quantive's API is one of the better ones in the category, so a scripted export of objectives, key results, owners and current values is straightforward. The standard export covers the same ground if you would rather not write code. 02 Leave the connectors behind The metric connectors and insight boards do not need recreating. They existed to move numbers into the goal layer; Vindaris syncs the work those numbers describe, so the goal reads from source rather than from a query someone maintains. 03 Connect the delivery tools Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. Tasks arrive with owners and projects attached, and the objectives gain a layer underneath them that Quantive never modelled. 04 Stop budgeting for a platform owner Quantive's flexibility came with an upkeep cost: someone had to keep the connectors and boards accurate or the data quietly rotted. That role does not transfer, because there is no query layer to maintain. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Quantive, feature by feature. Quantive wins on feature breadth. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the key result. Feature Vindaris Quantive How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Check-ins, metric connectors and manual updates against stored objectives. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKR-first, with KPI tracking layered on top. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer. Delivery stays in Jira, Asana, Planner and spreadsheets. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Dashboard thresholds on reported numbers, not detection from task movement. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Insight boards and data-warehouse style connectors. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Objective owner, with shared key results common in practice. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. No free tier. Enterprise pricing on quote, now under WorkBoard. Best fit Teams leaving an acquired tool who want the next one to be structurally different. Organizations already committed to the WorkBoard platform and its roadmap. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## An acquired enterprise contract, or a published price. Quantive's pricing now sits inside WorkBoard's commercial model, which means quote-based enterprise terms and a renewal conversation with a company you did not originally choose. Plan Quantive Vindaris Free tier Free tier withdrawn. Historically available, then discontinued. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Not published. Quoted, now under WorkBoard. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Not published. Enterprise configurations negotiated. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing No. Evaluation begins with a sales conversation. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Annual contract, with renewal terms set post-acquisition. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris publishes every tier: free forever for up to 5 people, EUR 10 per user per month for Connect, EUR 20 for Pro. No minimum contract, so the evaluation costs nothing but the time. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What happened to Quantive Results? Quantive, formerly Gtmhub, was acquired by WorkBoard in 2025 as part of a consolidation of the enterprise OKR market. For existing customers this raises the usual acquisition questions: product migration, re-contracting, and a roadmap now controlled by a different company. Many teams treat it as the natural moment to re-evaluate the category rather than the vendor. What is the best Quantive alternative? That depends on what you want to fix. If you want another goal tracker, the market has several. If the problem is that goal status has never been trustworthy between check-ins, the answer is a different architecture. Vindaris maps strategy, goals and KPIs down to every project and task, so progress and execution risk come from the work rather than from a reported number. How is Vindaris different from Quantive and WorkBoard? Quantive and WorkBoard are goal-tracking layers with connectors that move key-result values from other systems. Vindaris carries a native work layer: projects and tasks live in the same system as the goals, synced bidirectionally with HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira and Asana. That means a stalled task changes the goal's risk state without anyone reporting it. Can I migrate from Quantive to Vindaris? Yes. Export your objectives, key results and KPIs from Quantive and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM and hybrid structures. Your team keeps using their existing work tools, which Vindaris connects to through bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from Quantive is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Lattice Alternative for Strategy Execution | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/lattice-alternative Lattice Alternative HR-first architecture # In Lattice, goals sit beside reviews. Not on top of the work. An excellent people platform with goals attached. Goals live next to performance, not above delivery. Vindaris puts them on top of the work instead. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Lattice is a performance management platform: reviews, 1:1s, engagement, and growth, with goals as one HR module. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risks before they show up in an update. Lattice answers how people are performing. Vindaris answers whether the strategy is being executed. Where Lattice stops ## A people platform first. Goal execution comes second. Lattice is one of the strongest HR platforms available: reviews, one-to-ones, engagement surveys, career frameworks, compensation. Companies buy it for people operations and get goals in the box. Lattice does performance reviews, 1:1s, engagement surveys, and growth plans well, and goals are one module inside that suite. The module is designed for the HR cadence: employees set goals at the start of a cycle and update them around review season. That fits performance management. It does not fit running company strategy, where goals have to move every week and status has to be trustworthy between reviews. Because goal progress in Lattice is typed by the goal owner, it is only as current as the last time someone remembered to update it - and people remember around review time. Between cycles, the operational work that actually moves a goal lives in Jira, Asana, Planner, or a spreadsheet, and Lattice never sees it. Leadership ends up reading goal status that reflects an HR ritual rather than the state of the work. The structural gap In Lattice, a goal's status is an HR-cycle input. It is captured for reviews, not derived from delivery. Between cycles it goes stale, and the gap between what the goal says and what the work is doing is invisible until the next review surfaces it - usually too late to act. How it broke, every quarter 01 Review cycle arrives Goals get updated for the performance conversation. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Excellent performance, engagement and people tooling. - Goals connected to reviews and career conversations. - Strong manager enablement and one-to-one flows. - Well-adopted by HR teams across mid-size companies. ### Where teams hit the limit - Goals are an HR module rather than an execution system. - Progress is updated around the review cycle. - No representation of the delivery work underneath. - Execution reporting is thin for operators. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## A people platform is the wrong place for execution. HR-first model Lattice and most of the category - Goals live beside performance reviews, not above delivery. - Progress is updated around the review cycle. - Integrations serve HR systems more than delivery tools. - Dashboards show what people reported, which is not what happened. - Operators get a thin execution view. Work Graph model Vindaris - Goals live on the work, not in a module beside the review cycle. - Progress updates continuously instead of around review season. - Execution risk is flagged from task movement, weeks before a review. - Keep Lattice for performance; run strategy execution where it can be traced. - Any framework, including KPIs and Rocks that an HR goals module cannot hold. ## Lattice models the person. It does not model the work. Lattice's objects orbit the performance process: the review, the cycle, the competency, the 1-on-1. Goals are one more object in that orbit, which sets their update rhythm to the cycle rather than to the work. Object Lattice Vindaris Central object The review cycle and the employee record The goal graph and the work beneath it Goal update cadence Around review season, by the goal owner Continuous, from connected task state Goal types Objectives within the goals module OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard Connection to delivery None. Delivery lives in tools Lattice does not read Bidirectional sync with Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot, Google Risk detection Not modelled Pace, focus and capacity measured against plan Between review cycles a Lattice goal holds whatever value it was last given, which can be months old by the time anyone looks. That is acceptable for a development goal, where the review is the point. It is not acceptable for a company KPI, where the months between reviews are exactly when the miss becomes unavoidable. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Lattice ## Keep the people platform. Move execution out of it. Lattice is a strong performance platform and Vindaris does not replace it. What moves out is the set of goals that were never really development goals. 01 Separate development goals from company goals This is the step that does the work. Growth and competency goals belong in Lattice next to the review. Company objectives, KPIs and cross-team initiatives do not, and they are the ones going stale between cycles. Split the list before exporting anything. 02 Export the company goals from Lattice Lattice exports goals with owners, targets and current values. Bring the company half in as-is; the OKR structure carries over and owners map to Vindaris users. 03 Connect the delivery tools Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. This closes the gap that made the goals module feel like paperwork, because the work moving each objective becomes visible from inside the objective. 04 Let the review read from live data When review season comes round, the company-goal half no longer needs a data-gathering exercise beforehand. Progress has been current all quarter, so the conversation starts from what happened rather than from what people can reconstruct. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Lattice, feature by feature. Lattice wins on people operations. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the goal. Feature Vindaris Lattice How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Manual entry by goal owner, typically updated around review cycles. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKRs within the goals module; no KPI, OGSM, or hybrid support. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer; goals live in an HR module separate from delivery tools. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. No automatic detection; depends on the owner updating status before a review. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Performance review dashboards; goal progress is one input among many. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered in the goals module. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Goal owner tied to the employee record. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. No free tier; pricing is per-seat, typically bundled with HR modules. Best fit Teams that need execution status from real work, not review-cycle updates. Companies that want goals as part of a performance review suite. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## Priced per employee, or priced for the people running execution. Lattice prices per employee across the HR suite, typically with goals bundled into a performance package. You are buying headcount coverage, not execution coverage. Plan Lattice Vindaris Free tier No free tier. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-employee monthly pricing, bundled with performance and engagement modules. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Add-on modules for engagement, compensation and analytics. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Entry rates published; real configurations quoted. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Annual, across the full employee base. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, then EUR 10 per user per month, and it is bought by the teams that own execution rather than by HR for everyone. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between Lattice and Vindaris? Lattice is a performance management platform: reviews, 1:1s, engagement, and growth, with goals as one HR module. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risks before they show up in an update. Lattice answers how people are performing. Vindaris answers whether the strategy is being executed. Can Vindaris replace Lattice? For strategy execution, yes. For performance reviews, engagement surveys, and growth plans, Lattice does a job Vindaris is not built for. Many teams keep Lattice for the people function and use Vindaris to run execution, because goal status that is derived from work is a different need from a review cycle. Why are goals in Lattice disconnected from real work? Lattice goals live in an HR module updated by the owner around the review cadence, so progress is typed in rather than read from the work. The operational work that moves a goal lives in tools like Jira, Asana, or Planner, which the goals module does not connect to. Vindaris closes that gap with a native work layer. Can I migrate from Lattice to Vindaris? Yes. Export your objectives and goals from Lattice and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, and hybrid structures. Your team keeps using their existing work tools - Vindaris connects to them via bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Moving execution out of Lattice is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # 15Five Alternative 2026 - Beyond Self-Reports | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/15five-alternative 15Five Alternative HR-first architecture # 15Five measures how the week felt. Not whether work moved. Strong manager and engagement rituals, with goal progress reported as sentiment. Vindaris derives progress from the tasks themselves. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short 15Five is a performance and engagement platform built around weekly check-ins, recognition, and 1-on-1s, with an objectives module on top. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risks before they show up in an update. 15Five tells you how the team feels and what people reported; Vindaris tells you what the work is doing. Where 15Five stops ## Excellent manager rituals, measuring a different thing. 15Five is built around the weekly check-in, one-to-ones, recognition and engagement. As a manager cadence it works, and teams genuinely fill it in. 15Five's weekly check-in is the product: people write their plans and priorities, managers read and respond, and recognition and 1-on-1s sit on top. It is genuinely good for engagement and for keeping managers close to their teams. The objectives module rides on the same loop, which means a goal's status is whatever the owner reported in this week's check-in - a sentence written under time pressure, not the state of the work. When objective progress is self-reported in a weekly check-in, it tracks sentiment more than delivery. An owner writes that things are on track because that is how it feels, while the tasks that would prove it live in Jira, Asana, Planner, or a spreadsheet that 15Five never sees. The check-in is a great conversation. It is a poor source of truth for whether the strategy is moving. The structural gap In 15Five, an objective's status is a weekly self-report. It captures how the owner feels the work is going, not what the work is doing. When check-ins are rushed or skipped - and across a busy quarter they always are - the objective picture drifts from reality, and nobody can tell when it started. How it broke, every quarter 01 Weekly check-in arrives People report how the week felt, not what shipped. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Strong weekly manager and engagement rituals. - High completion rates on check-ins. - Good one-to-one and recognition flows. - Useful signal on morale and manager quality. ### Where teams hit the limit - Goal progress is self-reported alongside sentiment. - No link between a goal and the delivery work under it. - Execution reporting is thin for operators. - Positive sentiment can mask a stalled initiative. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## Engagement data is not execution data. HR-first model 15Five and most of the category - Goals live beside engagement, not above delivery. - Progress is reported alongside how the week felt. - Integrations serve HR systems more than delivery tools. - Dashboards show what people reported, which is not what happened. - Good morale can coexist with a stalled quarter. Work Graph model Vindaris - Objectives sit on the work, not beside the engagement survey. - Progress needs no self-report, so the check-in stops carrying two jobs. - Risk is flagged from task movement, not inferred from sentiment. - Keep 15Five for people development; run execution somewhere it can be measured. - Any framework: OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, or a hybrid. ## 15Five models the conversation. It does not model the work. 15Five is built around the employee and the manager relationship, and its objects reflect that: the check-in, the 1-on-1, the review, the pulse. Objectives are attached to a person inside that structure, which is why they behave like a development artefact rather than an execution one. Object 15Five Vindaris Central object The weekly check-in from an individual The task and its connection to a goal Where an objective lives On the employee record, inside the review cycle On the goal graph, above the work delivering it Progress source The number the person types in their check-in Task state in the connected work tools Sentiment First-class, and genuinely well done Not modelled. Read the work instead Cross-team goals Awkward, because the model is per-person Native, with one owner and explicit contributors The consequence shows up on any goal that more than one team touches. In a per-person model, a shared objective becomes several people's objectives, each reporting separately, and nobody holds the whole. Vindaris keeps one owner and models the contributors explicitly, so the goal has a single status derived from all the work under it rather than an average of self-reports. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off 15Five ## Keep the check-in. Move the goals somewhere they are observed. This is usually not a replacement. 15Five does performance and engagement well, and those are jobs Vindaris does not do. What moves is the objectives module. 01 Export objectives from 15Five 15Five exports objectives and key results with their owners and current values. Bring the file in as-is. Owners map to Vindaris users, so accountability carries over on the first import. 02 Connect the delivery tools Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google, whichever your teams actually ship in. This is the layer 15Five has no view of, and it is the whole reason the objectives felt disconnected from the work. 03 Rebuild cross-team goals as one goal Objectives that were duplicated across several people so each could check in on their part collapse into a single goal with one owner and named contributors. This usually reduces the objective count noticeably and makes the list readable again. 04 Leave the check-in to do one job The 15Five check-in keeps its people-development purpose: how the week went, where support is needed, what to talk about in the 1-on-1. It stops being the place where execution status is manufactured, which is what made it feel like admin. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs 15Five, feature by feature. 15Five wins on manager rituals. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the goal. Feature Vindaris 15Five How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Self-reported in the weekly check-in; a sentence or confidence rating. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKRs in a module on top of the check-in loop. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer; the tasks behind objectives live in other tools. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Depends on the owner flagging it in their weekly write-up. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Weekly check-in dashboards, engagement scores, 1-on-1 notes. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Objective owner linked to the employee profile. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. No free tier; per-user pricing bundled with check-in and performance features. Best fit Teams that need goal status derived from work, not weekly self-reports. Companies that want weekly engagement check-ins with lightweight OKRs. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## An HR suite seat, or an execution seat. 15Five prices per employee as part of a people-management suite, usually bundled across engagement, performance and objectives. The comparison is not like for like, which is itself the point: you are paying an HR platform rate for a goals module. Plan 15Five Vindaris Free tier No free tier. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-employee monthly pricing across bundled people-management modules. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Higher tiers add performance, engagement and analytics, not a work layer. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Partially. Entry rates are published; full configurations are quoted. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Typically annual, priced across the whole employee base. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people, then EUR 10 per user per month, and it is priced for the people who run execution rather than for headcount. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between 15Five and Vindaris? 15Five is a performance and engagement platform built around weekly check-ins, recognition, and 1-on-1s, with an objectives module on top. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risks before they show up in an update. 15Five tells you how the team feels and what people reported; Vindaris tells you what the work is doing. Does Vindaris replace 15Five's weekly check-ins? No, and it does not need to. 15Five's weekly check-in is a strong engagement and manager tool. Vindaris removes the need to rely on that check-in for goal status, because progress is derived from the work in tools like Jira, Asana, and Planner. Many teams keep 15Five for people and use Vindaris for execution. Why is objective progress in 15Five unreliable for execution? Because it is self-reported in a weekly check-in, so it reflects how the owner feels rather than verified delivery. When check-ins are rushed or skipped, the objective status drifts from reality with no warning. Vindaris derives status from the actual tasks and projects behind a goal, so it stays current without depending on a weekly write-up. Can I migrate from 15Five to Vindaris? Yes. Export your objectives from 15Five and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, and hybrid structures. Your team keeps using their existing work tools - Vindaris connects to them via bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Moving execution out of 15Five is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Perdoo Alternative | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/perdoo-alternative Perdoo Alternative Goal-layer architecture # In Perdoo, the number moves when a person moves it. Not when the work does. Clean OKR and KPI discipline, with a strategy map most teams find easy to keep. Progress still updates when someone updates it. Vindaris derives it from the work. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Perdoo links OKRs and KPIs to strategic pillars through a visual strategy map. Vindaris connects goals to the operational work that moves them and derives status from that work. Perdoo tells you where a goal sits in the strategy; Vindaris tells you whether the work behind it is moving. Where Perdoo stops ## Good OKR hygiene, still fed by hand. Perdoo is one of the tidier OKR products: a clear split between objectives, key results and initiatives, a readable strategy map, and pricing that mid-size teams can plan around. The model stops at the initiative, so a KPI moves when its owner moves it and not when the work does. Perdoo's strategy map is its standout feature. It gives teams a visual line from day-to-day OKRs up to company-level strategic pillars, and the separation of ambitions from results adds a clarity most OKR tools skip. For a team adopting OKRs and wanting to see how their goals fit, that structure is genuinely helpful. The gap is one layer down. The strategy map shows that a goal exists under a pillar, but it does not show whether the operational work that is supposed to move that goal is actually happening. The tasks live in Jira, Asana, Planner, or HubSpot, and Perdoo never reads them. The owner types a progress update, and the map colors reflect that typed number, not verified delivery. The structural gap In Perdoo, a goal's status is a manual update inside a strategy map. The map gives context - you can see where the goal sits - but the number in it is still what someone typed in. When updates lag, the strategy view stops reflecting the operational reality, and nobody can tell from the map alone. How it broke, every quarter 01 Update day arrives Owners retype what Jira and Asana already know. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Clean separation of objectives, key results and initiatives. - Readable strategy map that teams keep current. - Good OKR coaching material and onboarding. - Straightforward pricing for mid-size teams. ### Where teams hit the limit - Numbers move when a person updates them. - Initiatives are listed, not read from the work tools. - Risk depends on someone noticing and flagging it. - Reporting reflects update discipline more than delivery. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## Tidy OKR structure on the same manual input. Goal-layer model Perdoo and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams update goals as a reporting exercise. - Initiatives are listed rather than read from the work tools. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - Risk depends on a person noticing first. Work Graph model Vindaris - The strategy map connects down to tasks, not just down to OKRs. - Progress on a pillar is derived from work rather than rolled up from check-ins. - KPIs and OKRs share one structure instead of sitting in parallel. - Risk is flagged from stalled work, before the quarterly roll-up. - EOS Rocks and OGSM run alongside, not as an OKR workaround. ## Perdoo models the initiative. It does not read it. Perdoo does something most OKR tools skip: it models the layer above the objectives, with pillars and a strategy map that give the OKRs a reason to exist. The model is well judged. It simply has no layer below the objectives. Object Perdoo Vindaris Top of the model Pillars and the strategy map Strategy, and the same map Middle Objectives, key results, KPIs Goals and KPIs in one structure Bottom Nothing. Delivery is outside the product Projects and tasks, synced bidirectionally Progress source Check-ins against key results Task state in the connected tools KPIs and OKRs Parallel structures that reference each other One goal structure, two syntaxes over it Perdoo users tend to arrive at the same place: the strategy map is genuinely useful right up to the point where someone asks what is actually being done about a pillar that is behind. The answer lives in Jira and Asana, which the map does not reach. Vindaris extends the same map one layer down, so a pillar can name the tasks moving it. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Perdoo ## Keep the structure. Change where the numbers come from. The pillar structure is the part worth preserving, and it imports directly. What gets added is the layer underneath it. 01 Export pillars, OKRs and KPIs from Perdoo Perdoo exports the full hierarchy including pillars, objectives, key results and KPIs, with owners and current values. The strategy map structure carries over rather than needing to be rebuilt. 02 Bring KPIs and OKRs into one structure In Perdoo these are parallel objects that reference each other. In Vindaris they are two syntaxes over one goal structure, so the import usually collapses some duplication that had accumulated between them. 03 Connect the delivery tools Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. This is the layer Perdoo does not have, and it is what turns the strategy map from a diagram into something with live state. 04 Extend the map downward Confirm which projects and tasks feed which objectives. The pillar view now shows not just which objectives are behind but which work under them stopped moving, which is the question the map previously raised without answering. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Perdoo, feature by feature. Perdoo wins on OKR hygiene. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the key result. Feature Vindaris Perdoo How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Manual updates by goal owners with confidence levels. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKRs and KPIs linked to longer-term strategic pillars. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer; operational tasks live in external tools. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Depends on owners updating confidence; no automatic work-based detection. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Strategy maps and OKR dashboards with roll-up views. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Owner per objective and key result. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. Free tier for small teams, then per-user paid plans. Best fit Teams that need goals connected to the work that delivers them. Teams that want to link OKRs visually to a longer-term strategy map. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## Strategy mapping per seat, or the map plus the work layer. Perdoo prices per user with published tiers and a free band for small teams, which makes it easy to evaluate. Plan Perdoo Vindaris Free tier Free tier for a small number of users with limited features. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-user monthly pricing, published, by tier. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Higher tiers add strategy-map depth, KPI features and support. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Yes, published on the website. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Monthly or annual. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, then EUR 10 per user per month. The work layer is included at every tier rather than being the thing you upgrade for. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between Perdoo and Vindaris? Perdoo links OKRs and KPIs to strategic pillars through a visual strategy map. Vindaris connects goals to the operational work that moves them and derives status from that work. Perdoo tells you where a goal sits in the strategy; Vindaris tells you whether the work behind it is moving. Does Vindaris have a strategy map like Perdoo? Vindaris shows goal alignment and cross-team dependencies, but its core value is the connection to work, not a visual strategy map. Teams that want to see how OKRs ladder to company priorities can do that; the difference is that each goal's status is derived from connected tasks, not manually entered. Why is Perdoo's strategy map not enough for execution? Because the map shows the structural relationship between goals and strategy, but the progress numbers inside it are manually entered. The operational work that actually moves a goal lives in Jira, Asana, or Planner, and the map never reads it. Vindaris connects to those tools so status is derived, not declared. Can I migrate from Perdoo to Vindaris? Yes. Export your OKRs and KPIs from Perdoo and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, and hybrid structures. Your team keeps using their existing work tools - Vindaris connects to them via bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from Perdoo is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Mooncamp Alternative | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/mooncamp-alternative Mooncamp Alternative Goal-layer architecture # Mooncamp is flexible. Flexibility is not detection. A configurable, Notion-like OKR workspace with no engine reading pace against the plan. Vindaris reads the work and flags the drift. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Mooncamp is a configurable OKR platform for larger organizations that want flexible cascading, goal types, and alignment views. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risks before they show up in an update. Mooncamp gives you structure; Vindaris gives you the work-connected truth underneath the structure. Where Mooncamp stops ## Configurable in every direction, except the one that matters. Mooncamp is one of the most flexible OKR workspaces in the category: custom hierarchies, custom fields, custom views, a clean interface and a fair EU stance on data. Mooncamp's strength is configurability. You can set up goal types, cascading rules, check-in cadences, and alignment views to match how your organization runs. For companies with complex structures that need goals to flow cleanly from company level to team level, that flexibility is genuine and useful. What it does not do is connect any of those goals to the operational work that is supposed to move them. When goal progress in Mooncamp is manually updated, it carries the same weakness as every other manual-entry tool: status reflects what someone reported, not what the work is doing. The tasks that move a key result live in Jira, Planner, Asana, or HubSpot, and Mooncamp never reads them. A beautifully cascaded goal tree with stale status is still stale. The structural gap In Mooncamp, a goal's status is a manual entry. The cascade is well-built, but every number in it depends on someone remembering to update it. When updates lag - and at scale they always do - the alignment view stops reflecting reality, and nobody can tell when the picture went stale. How it broke, every quarter 01 Update day arrives Owners retype what Jira and Asana already know. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Highly configurable hierarchies, fields and views. - Clean, modern interface teams enjoy using. - EU-friendly hosting and data posture. - Fast to set up without consultants. ### Where teams hit the limit - No engine reading pace or focus against the plan. - Progress arrives when a person enters it. - Flexibility shifts effort to configuration. - Risk stays invisible between updates. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## A flexible goal layer is still a goal layer. Goal-layer model Mooncamp and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams update goals as a reporting exercise. - Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - Nothing observes pace against the plan. Work Graph model Vindaris - No cascade to configure, because the graph follows the work rather than the org chart. - Progress is derived from tasks instead of collected through check-ins. - Reorganisations do not require rebuilding the alignment structure. - Risk comes from task movement, not from a check-in cycle. - OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks and OGSM together, not OKRs with variations. ## Mooncamp models any structure. It reads no work. Mooncamp's distinguishing feature is how flexibly it models alignment: teams, departments, matrix structures, custom hierarchies, all configurable. The model is genuinely good. It is also a model of the organisation, which is a different thing from a model of the work. Object Mooncamp Vindaris Central object The configured alignment hierarchy The work, with alignment emerging from it Alignment source How you set the cascade up Which tasks actually feed which goals After a reorg Reconfigure the hierarchy Nothing to do. The edges follow the work Progress source Check-ins against key results Task state in the connected tools Hidden cross-team dependencies Only visible if someone modelled them Surfaced from shared work A configured hierarchy tells you how work is supposed to flow. A derived one tells you how it does. The two agree at the start of a quarter and diverge steadily after that, as teams pick up work that nobody mapped and drop work that the cascade still shows as aligned. Vindaris reads the second version because it is the one that predicts the miss. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Mooncamp ## Keep your structure. Add the signal. The good news for Mooncamp users is that the configuration work does not need repeating, because Vindaris does not need it. 01 Export objectives and key results from Mooncamp Mooncamp exports the OKR set with owners, targets and current values, and its API covers the same. Import as-is; the objectives keep their targets and their owners. 02 Skip the hierarchy rebuild The teams, departments and custom alignment structure do not need recreating. Vindaris derives alignment from which work feeds which goal, so the configuration effort that Mooncamp required has no equivalent step here. 03 Connect the delivery tools Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. The tasks arrive with their owners and projects, and the goal graph starts forming from real connections rather than declared ones. 04 Compare the two pictures Worth doing once. Put the alignment you configured in Mooncamp next to the alignment Vindaris derived. The differences are the work that drifted, and they are usually the most useful thing anyone learns in the first week. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Mooncamp, feature by feature. Mooncamp wins on flexibility. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the goal. Feature Vindaris Mooncamp How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Manual updates by goal owners; configurable check-in reminders. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKRs, KPIs, and custom goal types with flexible cascading. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. Limited; some integrations exist but no native bidirectional work layer. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. No automatic risk detection from connected work. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Configurable dashboards and progress views. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered natively. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Flexible ownership model with cascading permissions. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. No free tier; published per-user pricing (min 5 seats), enterprise on quote. Best fit Teams that need status derived from real work and cross-tool visibility. Larger organizations that want highly configurable OKR cascades. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## Per-seat configuration, or per-seat connection. Mooncamp prices per user with published tiers, and positions itself for mid-market and larger OKR programmes with a configuration phase attached. Plan Mooncamp Vindaris Free tier Free trial rather than a free tier. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-user monthly pricing, published, by feature tier. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Higher tiers add configuration depth, analytics and admin controls. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Yes, published on the website. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Annual on most tiers. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, then EUR 10 per user per month with every integration included, and there is no configuration project to budget for. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between Mooncamp and Vindaris? Mooncamp is a configurable OKR platform for larger organizations that want flexible cascading, goal types, and alignment views. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risks before they show up in an update. Mooncamp gives you structure; Vindaris gives you the work-connected truth underneath the structure. Can Vindaris handle complex organizational structures like Mooncamp? Yes. Vindaris supports multi-team alignment, cross-functional objectives, and any goal syntax (OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM). The difference is that each goal connects to the work that moves it, so status is derived rather than entered. It scales from a single team to a multi-team org without a rebuild. Why is Mooncamp's goal status unreliable for execution? Because progress is manually entered by goal owners. Even with check-in reminders, at scale updates lag and the beautifully cascaded alignment view quietly goes stale. Vindaris derives progress from the real work behind each goal, so the cascade stays accurate without depending on manual updates. Can I migrate from Mooncamp to Vindaris? Yes. Export your objectives and goals from Mooncamp and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, and hybrid structures. Your team keeps using their existing work tools - Vindaris connects to them via bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from Mooncamp is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Weekdone Alternative 2026 - Goals From Work | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/weekdone-alternative Weekdone Alternative Goal-layer architecture # Weekdone is a weekly status habit. Habits break. Plans, progress and problems, reported every week. The dashboard goes stale the week reports are skipped. Vindaris reads the work, so nothing goes stale. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Weekdone is a weekly status and OKR tool: people submit Plans, Progress, and Problems each week and move their OKR percentages by hand. Vindaris is strategy execution software that connects goals to the actual work and derives progress from it. Weekdone shows what people reported this week; Vindaris shows what the work is doing. Where Weekdone stops ## The weekly report is the product. And the single point of failure. Weekdone built a simple, well-understood ritual: plans, progress and problems each week, rolled into a manager view. For teams new to structured reporting it works. Weekdone's weekly report is the product. Every week, people fill in Plans, Progress, and Problems and move their OKR percentages, and the dashboard rolls it up for managers. The ritual is light and the dashboards are clean. The problem is what the numbers are based on: a person's weekly summary, not the tasks that did or did not move underneath. When OKR progress is a manual weekly entry, it drifts. An owner moves the percentage to match how the week felt, and stays optimistic until the quarter is nearly over. The work that should have moved the result lives in Jira, Asana, Planner, or a spreadsheet, and Weekdone never sees it. It sees the status a busy person typed into this week's report. The structural gap In Weekdone, an OKR's status is a weekly entry. A useful one for a quick team pulse, but still a manual number disconnected from the underlying work. Every insight depends on people filing their report on time. When reports slip - and across a busy quarter they always slip - the dashboard stops matching reality, and nobody can tell when it started. How it broke, every quarter 01 Report day arrives Everyone writes up what the tools already recorded. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Simple weekly plans, progress and problems format. - Easy for teams new to structured reporting. - Manager roll-up that is quick to read. - Low price and fast setup. ### Where teams hit the limit - Everything depends on the weekly report being filed. - Dashboards go stale the week reporting slips. - Progress is written prose, not synced work. - No signal when a goal quietly stops moving. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## A weekly report is not a live picture. Goal-layer model Weekdone and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams write a weekly report as a separate exercise. - Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - A skipped week leaves the picture wrong. Work Graph model Vindaris - Progress comes from closed tasks, so there is no Friday report to write. - Plans, Progress and Problems become a live view instead of a weekly form. - The Work Graph raises a problem the day the task stalls, not at the next PPP. - One owner per objective, with contributors tracked separately. - OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks and OGSM run side by side in one workspace. ## Weekdone models the report. It does not read the work. Weekdone's central object is the weekly report. Objectives and key results hang off it, and the report is what the product is organised around. That is a sound design for a status ritual and a poor one for execution, because the week is the smallest unit it can see. Object Weekdone Vindaris Central object The weekly PPP report The task, and every edge running up from it Progress source A percentage the owner enters in the weekly form Derived from task state in Jira, Planner, Asana or HubSpot Time resolution One week Continuous, updated as work moves Problems A free-text field someone remembers to fill Detected from stalled tasks, pace against plan, and focus drift What a KR knows about Its own number and its history The projects and tasks feeding it, and who is working on them The practical difference shows in the gap between reports. A key result that stopped moving on Tuesday is still green in Weekdone until someone files Friday's PPP, and it stays green through the following week if the owner reports optimistically. In Vindaris the key result inherits the state of the work under it, so the stall is visible on Tuesday and the reason is one click away. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Weekdone ## Keep the weekly rhythm. Drop the writing. The objectives move over intact. What does not move is the weekly reporting habit, which is the point of the exercise. 01 Export your objectives from Weekdone Weekdone exports objectives and key results to spreadsheet from the reporting area. Bring the file in as-is. The OKR structure you have been running carries over without rewriting, including the numeric targets and the current values. 02 Connect the tools your team reports about Whatever your PPP entries have been describing, that is the tool to connect first. Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot and Google sync bidirectionally, so the work your team writes up every Friday starts flowing in on its own. 03 Attach the work to the key results Vindaris proposes connections from labels, owners and project structure. Confirm them once. From that point a closed ticket moves the key result above it, which is exactly what the weekly report was approximating by hand. 04 Cancel the Friday report This is the step that pays for the migration. The PPP round exists because nothing else knew what happened; once progress is read from the work, the report is a duplicate of data the system already has. Keep the weekly meeting if it is useful. Drop the writing. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Weekdone, feature by feature. Weekdone wins on simplicity. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the goal. Feature Vindaris Weekdone How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Weekly PPP reports (Plans, Progress, Problems) plus a manually moved OKR percentage. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKRs and weekly status; limited beyond that. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer; the tasks that move a goal live elsewhere. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Depends on someone flagging a Problem in the weekly report. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Weekly PPP roll-up and OKR dashboards. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Owner per objective. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. Free tier for very small teams, then per-user paid plans. Best fit Growing teams that need status from real work, KPIs, and cross-team dependencies. Small teams that want a simple weekly status ritual and basic OKR tracking. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## Per-seat reporting, or a free tier that already reads the work. Weekdone prices per user with a free band for very small teams and published paid tiers above it. The comparison worth making is what each seat gets you, because one is paying for a place to write status and the other for a system that derives it. Plan Weekdone Vindaris Free tier Free tier for a small number of users, with reporting features limited. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-user monthly pricing, published, with the rate stepping down as seats rise. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Higher tiers add reporting depth and admin controls rather than a work layer. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Yes, published on the website. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Monthly or annual, with the usual annual discount. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations and every core feature, including the Work Graph. Weekdone's free band is a trial of the reporting product; ours is the product. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between Weekdone and Vindaris? Weekdone is a weekly status and OKR tool: people submit Plans, Progress, and Problems each week and move their OKR percentages by hand. Vindaris is strategy execution software that connects goals to the actual work and derives progress from it. Weekdone shows what people reported this week; Vindaris shows what the work is doing. Does Vindaris have weekly check-ins like Weekdone? Vindaris does not depend on them. Because goals connect to the work in HubSpot, Planner, Google, and Jira, progress updates automatically as work moves. You can keep a weekly team pulse if you like it, but the baseline status comes from the work itself rather than a weekly report. Why is Weekdone's OKR progress unreliable? Because it is a manual weekly entry, so it reflects a person's summary rather than the tasks underneath. When reports are skipped, the dashboard quietly goes stale and an owner can stay green until the quarter is nearly over. Vindaris derives progress from the real work behind each goal, so risk surfaces before a weekly report would have caught it. Can I migrate from Weekdone to Vindaris? Yes. Export your OKRs and weekly plans from Weekdone and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, and hybrid structures. Your team keeps using their existing work tools - Vindaris connects to them via bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from Weekdone is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Tability Alternative 2026 - Beyond Check-Ins | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/tability-alternative Tability Alternative Goal-layer architecture # Confidence is what the owner says. Not what the work shows. Tability makes weekly check-ins pleasant and fast. The score still reflects a person's judgement. Vindaris derives the picture from task data. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Tability is an OKR tracking tool built around a weekly check-in: owners rate confidence on each outcome and the ratings roll up. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software with a native work layer, so progress and execution risk are derived from the tasks moving each goal rather than from a rating. Tability reports how the owner feels. Vindaris reports what the work is doing. Where Tability stops ## A friendly check-in ritual, measuring the same opinion. Confidence is self-assessed. A team can report amber for six weeks while the underlying work has not moved at all, and nothing in the system disagrees. Tability gives you clean OKRs, weekly check-in reminders, confidence scoring, and AI-assisted goal drafting. The cadence is the product. Every week, owners open Tability and rate how each outcome is going on a traffic-light scale, add a note, and move on. It is a genuinely good ritual. The problem is what the rating is based on: a person's read on the situation, not the work that is or is not happening underneath it. When confidence is self-reported, it drifts. An owner stays optimistic until the quarter is nearly over, then the green turns red in week eleven with no warning the system could have given. The work that should have moved the outcome lives in Jira, Asana, Planner, or a spreadsheet, and Tability never sees it. It sees the summary a busy person typed under time pressure. The structural gap In Tability, a goal's status is an opinion. A well-informed opinion, often, but still a manual input disconnected from the underlying work. Every insight depends on owners checking in honestly and on time. When check-ins slip, and across a busy quarter they always slip, the picture leadership sees stops matching reality, and nobody can tell when it started. How it broke, every quarter 01 Check-in prompt arrives Owners score confidence from memory, not from data. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Fast, low-friction weekly check-ins. - Confidence scoring that teams actually complete. - Good Slack prompts and reminders. - Quick to adopt without a rollout project. ### Where teams hit the limit - Confidence reflects judgement, not task data. - A goal can look amber for weeks without work moving. - Check-in quality decays under delivery pressure. - No signal between check-ins. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## A better ritual is still a ritual. Goal-layer model Tability and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams report confidence as a weekly exercise. - Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - Nothing contradicts an optimistic score. Work Graph model Vindaris - Progress is read from the work, so a confidence rating is never the input. - No check-in reminder loop, because there is nothing waiting to be checked in. - Risk comes from task movement and pace, not from a person's self-assessment. - Every goal traces down to the tasks and people delivering it. - OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks and OGSM in one workspace, not OKRs only. ## Tability models the check-in. It does not read the work. Tability's model is elegant and small: an outcome, a current value, and a confidence rating the owner sets each week. Everything the product does well follows from that model, and so does everything it cannot do. Object Tability Vindaris Central object The check-in on an outcome The edge between a goal and the work under it Progress source A value and a confidence rating the owner sets Task state in the connected work tools What confidence means How the owner feels about the outcome Pace and focus measured against the plan When a goal is at risk When someone lowers the rating When the work under it slows, whoever has noticed Contributing work Not modelled Projects and tasks, with owners and capacity A confidence rating is a genuinely useful signal, and Tability collects it more gracefully than any competitor. The limit is that it is a lagging one. Owners lower confidence after they have concluded the outcome is in trouble, which is generally after the work has been visibly stuck for a while. Vindaris reads the stuck work directly, so the signal arrives at the point where it is still actionable. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Tability ## Keep the weekly rhythm. Stop guessing the number. Tability's structure maps cleanly onto Vindaris, so the migration is mostly a matter of attaching work underneath the outcomes you already have. 01 Export outcomes and initiatives from Tability Tability exports plans with their outcomes, targets and current values, and its API covers the same ground if you would rather script it. Bring the export in as-is; the outcome structure carries over with targets intact. 02 Connect the tools where the initiatives actually run Tability's initiatives are usually thin references to work happening elsewhere. Connect that elsewhere: Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. The initiatives stop being labels and become the actual tasks. 03 Let the outcomes inherit their work Confirm the proposed mappings between synced work and each outcome. From then on the current value and the risk state come from the tasks, which is what the weekly confidence rating was estimating. 04 Turn off the check-in reminders The Slack nudge asking for a rating has nothing left to collect. Owners still write commentary when there is something worth saying, but the number underneath it is no longer their responsibility to produce. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Tability, feature by feature. Tability wins on check-in experience. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the goal. Feature Vindaris Tability How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Weekly confidence check-ins, rated by the owner on a traffic-light scale. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. Built around OKRs; other frameworks fit awkwardly. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. Integrations push updates in; no native work layer to trace tasks. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Surfaces when an owner lowers their confidence score. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Weekly check-in digest and OKR dashboards. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. One owner per outcome. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. Free trial, then per-user paid plans. Best fit Teams that need progress read from delivery rather than rated once a week. Small teams that want a light, well-designed weekly OKR check-in ritual. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## Paying per seat for check-ins, or for a connected work layer. Tability publishes per-user pricing with a free band for small teams, which is more transparent than most of the category. The question is what the seat buys. Plan Tability Vindaris Free tier Free band for a small team with limited plans and history. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-user monthly pricing, published, with paid tiers by feature depth. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Higher tiers add plans, history and integrations rather than a work layer. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Yes, published on the website. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Monthly or annual. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations and the full Work Graph, then EUR 10 per user per month for unlimited sync across every integration. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between Tability and Vindaris? Tability is an OKR tracking tool built around a weekly check-in: owners rate confidence on each outcome and the ratings roll up. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software with a native work layer, so progress and execution risk are derived from the tasks moving each goal rather than from a rating. Tability reports how the owner feels. Vindaris reports what the work is doing. Does Vindaris have check-ins like Tability? Vindaris has commentary, but it does not need a check-in to know where a goal stands. Progress comes from connected work in Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google, so an owner writes a note when there is judgement worth adding rather than to keep the number current. Teams that liked the Tability ritual usually keep the meeting and drop the form. Can I migrate from Tability to Vindaris? Yes. Export your plans, outcomes and initiatives from Tability, or pull them through its API, and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Targets and current values carry over, and Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM and hybrid structures. Your team keeps their existing work tools, which Vindaris connects to through bidirectional sync. Is Vindaris free to use? Yes, free forever for up to 5 people, including 2 integrations and the full Work Graph. Paid plans start at EUR 10 per user per month for Connect, which adds unlimited integrations and sync, and EUR 20 for Pro. There is no minimum contract and no setup fee. See vindaris.com/pricing. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from Tability is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Cascade Alternative - Goals Tied to Real Work | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/cascade-alternative Cascade Alternative Goal-layer architecture # Cascade maps the plan. Someone still types in the progress. The portfolio views are genuinely good. What fills them is reported by hand, so risk surfaces when a person reports it. Vindaris reads the work underneath instead. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Cascade is a strategy execution platform with visual planning, timelines, OKRs, and executive dashboards. Vindaris connects goals to the operational work that moves them and derives status from that work. Cascade gives you a planning layer; Vindaris gives you the work-connected truth without building a second layer. Where Cascade stops ## The planning layer is strong. The progress underneath it is self-reported. Cascade gives leadership a serious portfolio and planning surface: strategy maps, roadmaps, dashboards, roll-ups across a large org. That part earns its price. Cascade's ambition is to be the strategy execution platform: a place where strategic plans, OKRs, KPIs, and timelines all live and roll up into executive dashboards. It has visual planning tools, Gantt-style views, and reporting that can impress in a boardroom. For a leadership team that wants a single view of the strategy, that ambition is real. The challenge is that the planning layer sits alongside the work rather than reading from it. The tasks that actually deliver the strategy live in Jira, Asana, Planner, or HubSpot, and while Cascade has some integrations, they do not create the bidirectional, traceable link that makes status trustworthy. The risk is building a second project-management layer that needs its own feeding rather than drawing from the first. The structural gap In Cascade, strategic plans and goals live in a planning layer next to the work. Some integrations exist, but status still depends largely on manual updates. When the planning layer drifts from the delivery reality - and without a native work connection it will - the executive dashboard tells a story the operational ground does not support. How it broke, every quarter 01 Update day arrives Owners retype what Jira and Asana already know. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Strong C-suite planning and portfolio views. - Strategy maps that leadership actually reads. - Deep roll-up across large, multi-layer organizations. - Mature reporting for board and quarterly reviews. ### Where teams hit the limit - Progress is largely entered by hand, quarter after quarter. - Risk surfaces when someone reports it, not when work stalls. - Integrations sync a percentage rather than task-level context. - Adoption depends on a discipline that decays under load. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## A better planning layer is still a planning layer. Goal-layer model Cascade and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams update goals as a reporting exercise. - Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - Risk is discovered in the review, not before it. Work Graph model Vindaris - One layer, not a planning layer maintained alongside the delivery layer. - Plan progress is read from the work rather than rolled up from updates. - Nothing to reconcile on Friday, because there is no second copy of the plan. - Risk surfaces from stalled tasks before the portfolio view would show it. - Any framework, with the plan structure coming from the goals themselves. ## Cascade models the plan. It does not read the work. Cascade's strength is that it gives strategy its own well-modelled home: focus areas, objectives, projects, measures, all laid out visually. The cost is that this home is a parallel structure to the one your delivery tools already contain, and parallel structures have to be kept in step by hand. Object Cascade Vindaris Central object The plan, modelled in its own layer The work, with the plan as edges over it Projects Plan-layer records that mirror real projects The real projects, synced from Jira, Asana or Planner Progress source Updates entered against plan records Task state in the tool where the work happens Reconciliation Required, and usually weekly Not applicable. There is one copy Drift between plan and delivery Invisible until someone compares them Structurally impossible The drift is the thing to watch. A Cascade project marked 60 percent is a claim about a real project somewhere else, made by whoever last updated it. When those two diverge, the executive dashboard and the delivery board tell different stories and both look authoritative. Vindaris has no second copy to diverge from. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Cascade ## Move the plan without rebuilding the reporting habit. Cascade users have usually invested real effort in modelling the plan. That structure carries over; what stops is maintaining it separately from the work. 01 Export the plan from Cascade Cascade exports focus areas, objectives, projects and measures, and its API covers the same ground for a scripted move. The hierarchy imports intact, so the shape of the plan you spent a quarter designing is preserved. 02 Connect the tools the plan describes Every Cascade project is a pointer to work happening in Jira, Asana, Planner or a spreadsheet. Connect those. This is the step where the plan stops being a description of the work and starts being attached to it. 03 Replace mirror projects with real ones Vindaris proposes matches between each plan-layer project and the synced project it was mirroring. Confirm them and the duplicate disappears: one project, visible from both the delivery board and the strategy view. 04 Stop the weekly reconciliation The recurring job of walking the plan and updating it against reality has no input left. Measures move when their work moves. The portfolio review starts from a view nobody had to prepare. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Cascade, feature by feature. Cascade wins on planning surface. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the plan, which is the row that decides whether the dashboard is true. Feature Vindaris Cascade How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Manual updates by goal owners; some metric tracking via integrations. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKRs, KPIs, and strategic plans with visual planning tools. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. Some integrations exist but no native bidirectional work layer. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Limited automatic detection; largely depends on manual status updates. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Strategy dashboards, Gantt-style views, and executive reports. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered natively. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Owner per objective and plan item. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. Free tier available for small teams. Best fit Teams that need execution status derived from the work in their tools. Teams that want visual strategic planning with Gantt-style project views. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## A planning platform seat, or a connected execution seat. Cascade prices per user and positions upward, with the fuller strategy-execution configurations quoted rather than listed. Evaluation tends to start with a conversation. Plan Cascade Vindaris Free tier Free tier, historically generous, with the strategy features gated above it. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-user pricing that steps up sharply for the enterprise configuration. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Higher tiers add planning depth, governance and support, not a work layer. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Partially. Entry tiers published, enterprise quoted. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Annual for the tiers most buyers end up on. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris publishes every tier: free forever for up to 5 people, EUR 10 per user per month for Connect, EUR 20 for Pro, with no seat minimum and no annual term. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between Cascade and Vindaris? Cascade is a strategy execution platform with visual planning, timelines, OKRs, and executive dashboards. Vindaris connects goals to the operational work that moves them and derives status from that work. Cascade gives you a planning layer; Vindaris gives you the work-connected truth without building a second layer. Does Vindaris have strategic planning tools like Cascade? Vindaris focuses on connecting goals to work, not on Gantt charts or timeline planning. It supports any goal syntax (OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM) and shows alignment across teams. The strategic planning structure comes from the goals themselves and the work connections, not from a visual planning overlay. Why is Cascade's planning layer a risk? Because it sits next to the work rather than reading from it. Teams end up maintaining two places: the work tools where delivery happens and the planning layer where status is reported. When those drift apart, the executive dashboard tells one story while the operational ground tells another. Vindaris avoids this by deriving status from the work tools directly. Can I migrate from Cascade to Vindaris? Yes. Export your strategic plans, OKRs, and KPIs from Cascade and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM, and hybrid structures. Your team keeps using their existing work tools - Vindaris connects to them via bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from Cascade is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # ClearPoint Alternative - Any Framework | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/clearpoint-alternative ClearPoint Alternative Report-first architecture # ClearPoint is built for the report. Not for the weeks between. Solid Balanced Scorecard reporting, especially in the public sector. It is built to produce the briefing, not to detect drift before it. Vindaris watches the work continuously. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short ClearPoint is a Balanced Scorecard reporting platform: it models measures and initiatives, then renders scorecards and strategy maps from data people enter. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software that maps strategy, goals and KPIs down to every project and task, in any framework, with the Work Graph flagging execution risk from the work itself rather than from a reported figure. Where ClearPoint stops ## A reporting system, working exactly as designed. ClearPoint does Balanced Scorecard reporting properly: perspectives, measures, initiatives, briefing books, the formatted output a council or board expects. The cycle is the point - and between reports there is no mechanism watching whether the work is moving. ClearPoint visualizes Balanced Scorecard progress with structured reports and strategy maps that look sharp in a quarterly review. For a strategy office whose main job is producing that review reliably, it does the job. The data feeding those reports arrives through manual entry, uploaded spreadsheets, or connectors that move a number without the context behind it. That is the boundary of any tool built as a reporting layer above execution. It can tell you accurately what people entered. It cannot tell you what is happening. The scorecard shows green while the initiative behind the measure stalled three weeks ago, and the distance between those two facts is exactly where strategy visibility breaks down. The structural gap ClearPoint assumes one framework. Most organizations above fifty people run several at once: Balanced Scorecard at board level, OKRs in product, KPIs in operations, EOS Rocks for quarterly priorities. ClearPoint asks you to translate all of it into BSC language or run a second tool beside it. Vindaris treats the framework as a syntax choice. How it broke, every quarter 01 Reporting period closes Owners collect measures for the briefing book. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Thorough Balanced Scorecard and strategy reporting. - Briefing books and formatted output for boards. - Strong fit for public sector and regulated reporting. - Long track record with scorecard methodology. ### Where teams hit the limit - Built around a reporting period rather than continuous signal. - Measures are collected and entered by owners. - No detection of drift between reports. - Initiative work lives outside the system. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## Reporting on the period is not watching the work. Report-first model ClearPoint and most of the category - Measures live in one system. Work lives in another. - Owners collect status for each reporting period. - Integrations import values rather than traceable work. - Reports show what owners submitted, which is not what happened. - Between reports there is no signal at all. Work Graph model Vindaris - Balanced Scorecard runs natively beside OKRs, KPIs and Rocks in one system. - Measures read from the work rather than from an uploaded spreadsheet. - An initiative behind a measure can be opened and inspected. - Risk arrives between reporting periods, not at the end of one. - No translation step to get non-BSC teams into the scorecard. ## ClearPoint models the scorecard. It does not read the work. ClearPoint models the Balanced Scorecard properly: perspectives, objectives, measures, initiatives, cascaded scorecards, briefing books. Within that frame it is thorough. The frame ends at the initiative, which is a record with a name and a status rather than a body of work. Object ClearPoint Vindaris Central object The measure inside a perspective The measure, plus the work under it Initiative A record with an owner and a status field A real project, synced from the delivery tool Measure values Manual entry, spreadsheet upload, or a connector Derived from the work, or connected where it is a true metric Framework Balanced Scorecard. Others need translating BSC, OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART together Between reporting periods The scorecard holds its last value State changes as the work changes The reporting period is the constraint. A scorecard built for a monthly or quarterly cycle is designed to be accurate on the reporting date, and it is. In the weeks between, a measure can be green while the initiative meant to move it has not been touched since the last review, and nothing in the model registers that. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off ClearPoint ## Keep the scorecard. Add a signal between reports. The Balanced Scorecard structure is not something you have to give up. It imports as a first-class framework, and stops being the only one available. 01 Export scorecards, measures and initiatives from ClearPoint ClearPoint exports the scorecard hierarchy with perspectives, objectives, measures, initiatives and historical values. The BSC structure imports as-is, including cascaded scorecards. 02 Stop translating the other frameworks Any team that was forcing OKRs or Rocks into BSC language, or running a second tool alongside, can use its own syntax now. The board still reads a scorecard; the teams stop doing translation work to feed it. 03 Connect the tools the initiatives live in Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. The initiative records that were names with statuses become the actual projects, with their tasks and owners visible from inside the measure. 04 Let the briefing book build itself The data-gathering that precedes every quarterly review has no input left. Measures carry current values because the work under them is current, so the review starts from a scorecard nobody spent a week assembling. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs ClearPoint, feature by feature. ClearPoint wins on formal reporting. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the measure. Feature Vindaris ClearPoint How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Manual entry, uploaded spreadsheets, or connectors that move numbers without context. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. Balanced Scorecard. OKR, EOS and OGSM structures require translation. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer. Initiatives are delivered in separate project tools. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Threshold colours on reported measures, set after the period closes. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Strategy maps, scorecards and briefing books built for periodic review. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Measure and initiative owners inside the scorecard hierarchy. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. No free tier. Pricing on quote. Best fit Organizations running more than one framework that need live status under each measure. Strategy offices committed to Balanced Scorecard reporting on a fixed cycle. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## A scorecard reporting platform, or a scorecard with the work attached. ClearPoint sells to strategy offices with quoted pricing scaled by scorecards and users, so cost depends on a scoping conversation. Plan ClearPoint Vindaris Free tier No free tier. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Not published. Quoted by user count and scorecard count. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Not published. Enterprise and multi-scorecard configurations negotiated. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing No. Evaluation begins with a sales conversation. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Annual contract. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris publishes every tier: free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, EUR 10 per user per month for Connect, EUR 20 for Pro. Balanced Scorecard is available on every tier, including the free one. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between ClearPoint and Vindaris? ClearPoint is a Balanced Scorecard reporting platform: it models measures and initiatives, then renders scorecards and strategy maps from data people enter. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software that maps strategy, goals and KPIs down to every project and task, in any framework, with the Work Graph flagging execution risk from the work itself rather than from a reported figure. Does Vindaris support the Balanced Scorecard? Yes, natively, and alongside other frameworks at the same time. Perspectives, objectives, measures and initiatives all model directly. The difference is that each measure connects to the projects and tasks delivering it, so a scorecard reflects what the work is doing rather than what was typed in before the review. See vindaris.com/balanced-scorecard. Can I run OKRs and Balanced Scorecard in the same system? In Vindaris, yes. The framework is a syntax choice rather than a product decision, so the board can read a scorecard while product teams run OKRs and operations tracks KPIs, without translation between them. ClearPoint is built around Balanced Scorecard, so mixed-framework organizations usually translate everything into BSC language or add a second tool. Can I migrate from ClearPoint to Vindaris? Yes. Export your scorecards, measures and initiatives from ClearPoint and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports Balanced Scorecard, OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM and hybrid structures. Your team keeps their existing work tools, which Vindaris connects to through bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from ClearPoint is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # Profit.co Alternative - Work-Connected OKRs | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/profit-co-alternative Profit.co Alternative Goal-layer architecture # Profit.co has every module. All of them wait for input. One of the deepest OKR feature checklists in the category, still fed by manual updates. Vindaris derives progress from the tasks underneath. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short Profit.co is a broad OKR platform with KPI dashboards, task boards and performance reviews added as modules over a goal-tracking core. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software with a native work layer: strategy, goals and KPIs map down to every project and task, and the Work Graph flags execution risk from task movement rather than from a check-in. Where Profit.co stops ## Breadth of modules, one narrow source of truth. Profit.co covers a lot: OKRs, task management, performance reviews, employee engagement, strategy templates, KPI libraries. Every module still resolves to a number a person enters. Profit.co started as an OKR tool and grew by adding features: KPI dashboards, task boards, performance reviews, review templates. Each addition extends what the product covers, and the breadth is real value for a team that wants one subscription. None of it changes the foundation, which is a goal-syntax tracker. The task management is a convenience layer rather than a work system. Teams still deliver in Jira, Planner, HubSpot or Google Sheets, and the connection between that delivery and the OKRs it should drive stays manual or loosely integrated. The KPI module shows the same pattern: KPIs are tracked alongside OKRs as a parallel structure rather than as part of one goal architecture, so linking the two to each other and to the work beneath them takes mapping discipline that erodes across quarters. The structural gap The question worth testing on any tool. When a key result is off track, can the system show you which specific work items are stalled, reassigned, or never started? In Profit.co, answering means leaving the tool. In Vindaris, the goal and the work share one system, so the answer is already there. How it broke, every quarter 01 Update day arrives Owners update modules the delivery tools already cover. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Very broad OKR and performance feature set. - Large library of KPI and OKR examples. - Configurable to many operating models. - Aggressive pricing for the feature set. ### Where teams hit the limit - Every module depends on manual input. - Breadth increases the maintenance burden per quarter. - Task features duplicate the tools teams already use. - Reported progress remains the source of truth. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## More modules, same manual core. Goal-layer model Profit.co and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams update goals as a reporting exercise. - Task modules duplicate the tools teams already work in. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - More modules means more places to keep current. Work Graph model Vindaris - One structure for goals and work, not modules stitched together. - KPIs and OKRs share a model instead of running in parallel. - No second task board to adopt, because your existing tools sync in. - Risk surfaces from real task movement rather than from a check-in value. - Mapping goals to work is structural, so it does not decay across quarters. ## Profit.co models everything. It reads almost nothing. Profit.co grew by addition, and the data model shows the history. OKRs came first, then KPIs, then tasks, then performance reviews, each as its own structure with references between them. Breadth is real. Depth is what references cannot provide. Object Profit.co Vindaris OKRs The original core object One goal structure, OKR syntax over it KPIs A parallel structure that references OKRs The same goal structure, KPI syntax over it Tasks A built-in board most teams bypass The real tasks, synced from the tool teams use Goal to work link Manual mapping, maintained by discipline Structural, maintained by the sync When a key result is off track Leave the tool to find out why Open the goal and read the stalled tasks The built-in task board is the clearest symptom. It exists because the model needed somewhere for work to live, but teams already have Jira or Planner, so the board goes unused and the mapping between goals and real work goes back to being manual. Vindaris does not ask for the work to move; it connects to where the work already is. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off Profit.co ## Bring the goals. Drop the duplicate modules. Most of the migration is consolidation. The objects that were parallel structures become one. 01 Export OKRs and KPIs from Profit.co Profit.co exports objectives, key results and KPI definitions with owners and current values. Bring both across; they will not stay separate on the other side. 02 Merge the parallel KPI and OKR structures In Vindaris a KPI and an OKR are two syntaxes over one goal structure, so the cross-references you were maintaining between them collapse. This usually removes a layer of duplication that had built up quietly. 03 Connect the tools your team actually works in Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google rather than recreating the Profit.co task board. The tasks your team already has become the work layer under the goals. 04 Retire the check-in With work connected, the periodic check-in that updated key-result values has nothing to add. The discipline that was keeping the goal-to-work mapping alive is no longer required, which is the part that always eroded first. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs Profit.co, feature by feature. Profit.co wins on breadth. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the key result. Feature Vindaris Profit.co How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Check-ins against key results, with KPI values entered or imported separately. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKR-first, with KPIs and tasks added as parallel modules. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. Built-in task boards that most teams bypass for their real delivery tools. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Status colours derived from reported check-in values. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Broad dashboard and review templates across the module set. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Limited, and separate from the goal structure. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Key-result owner, with alignment maps across the org. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. No free tier; quote-based proposal pricing across Small Business, Mid-Market and Enterprise. Best fit Teams that want one architecture rather than several modules stitched together. Teams that want broad OKR feature coverage and fast initial setup. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## Priced per user for breadth, or per user for depth. Profit.co publishes per-user pricing with a free tier, and is one of the more affordable products in the category. The tiers are structured around how many modules you want. Plan Profit.co Vindaris Free tier Free tier for a limited number of users with feature caps. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-user monthly pricing, published, competitive for the category. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Higher tiers unlock further modules: KPIs, tasks, performance, analytics. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Yes, published on the website. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Monthly or annual. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, then EUR 10 per user per month. The work layer and execution-risk detection are on every tier, including the free one, rather than being what the upgrade unlocks. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between Profit.co and Vindaris? Profit.co is a broad OKR platform with KPI dashboards, task boards and performance reviews added as modules over a goal-tracking core. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software with a native work layer: strategy, goals and KPIs map down to every project and task, and the Work Graph flags execution risk from task movement rather than from a check-in. Does Profit.co connect OKRs to real work? Profit.co offers built-in task boards and integrations with delivery tools, but the boards duplicate systems teams already use and the integrations move data rather than traceable connections. Keeping goals mapped to work relies on manual effort that erodes over time. Vindaris syncs bidirectionally with HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira and Asana and holds the mapping structurally. Is Vindaris cheaper than Profit.co? Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people including 2 integrations, with published paid plans and no minimum contract. Profit.co is now quote-based, with pricing built into a proposal by an account team. The more useful comparison is what you get per seat: Vindaris includes the native work layer and execution-risk detection at every tier rather than as an add-on. See vindaris.com/pricing. Can I migrate from Profit.co to Vindaris? Yes. Export your objectives, key results and KPIs from Profit.co and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM and hybrid structures, so nothing needs rewriting. Your team keeps their existing work tools, which Vindaris connects to through bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from Profit.co is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # WorkBoard Alternative - Any Framework | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/workboard-alternative WorkBoard Alternative Goal-layer architecture # WorkBoard runs the review. It does not watch the work. Enterprise OKR machinery built around manual check-ins and results reviews. The review finds the miss. Vindaris finds it weeks earlier, in the work. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short WorkBoard is an enterprise OKR platform: it stores objectives, cascades them through the org chart, and reports on progress supplied by goal owners. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risk before a check-in would surface it. WorkBoard answers what people reported. Vindaris answers what the work is doing. Where WorkBoard stops ## The cadence is the product. The data feeding it is still manual. WorkBoard is built for the enterprise operating rhythm: business reviews, results meetings, alignment sessions, executive roll-ups. Run well, that cadence creates real accountability. WorkBoard does one thing very well. It gives a large organization a structured way to define OKRs, cascade them through the org chart, and report on them in a format an executive team will accept. The enterprise wrapper around that is genuinely strong: SSO, permission models, audit trails, the controls procurement asks about before anything else. The limitation sits underneath all of it. Teams define objectives in WorkBoard, then do the actual work in Jira, Asana, Planner, Salesforce, or a spreadsheet. Bridging the two is a check-in, a weekly update, or a connector that moves a number without the context behind it. Leadership gets a reliable view of what people reported. It does not get a view of whether the work below those objectives is moving. The structural gap WorkBoard does not publish its pricing. Custom quotes, annual contracts, and a procurement cycle stand between a mid-market team and a product conversation. Vindaris publishes its plans, is free to start, and requires no minimum contract. See pricing details. How it broke, every quarter 01 Review week arrives Owners assemble numbers the delivery tools already hold. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Serious enterprise OKR machinery and governance. - Business review cadence that senior teams stick to. - Strong alignment and cascade tooling at scale. - Mature enterprise controls and rollout support. ### Where teams hit the limit - Check-ins and results reviews carry the whole data model. - The review finds the miss rather than the graph. - Heavy rollout and change-management overhead. - Priced and scoped for large enterprises. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## Enterprise machinery around the same manual core. Goal-layer model WorkBoard and most of the category - Goals live in one system. Work lives in another. - Teams update results as preparation for a meeting. - Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome. - Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened. - The miss is found in the review, not before it. Work Graph model Vindaris - Published pricing, so evaluation starts with the product rather than procurement. - A native work layer, so an objective can name the tasks behind its number. - Risk detected from task movement rather than from a confidence rating. - Weight suited to a few hundred people, not a few hundred thousand. - Any framework, without the OKR office required to run it. ## WorkBoard models the review. It does not read the work. WorkBoard's model is built for scale: objectives, key results, alignment across a deep org chart, business reviews on top. It handles a Fortune 500 hierarchy better than anything else in the category. What it does not hold is any representation of delivery. Object WorkBoard Vindaris Central object The objective, cascaded through the org chart The task, and the edges up to the goal Alignment source The reporting line Which work feeds which goal Progress source Check-ins, plus connectors that move a metric value Task state in Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot Behind a key-result number Nothing the system can show you The projects, tasks, owners and capacity Risk signal A lowered confidence rating Pace and focus measured against plan A metric connector is not a work layer, and the difference matters when a number goes the wrong way. A connector can tell you the value dropped. It cannot tell you that three of the fourteen tasks feeding it were reassigned last month and one has not moved since. That information exists in the delivery tool; WorkBoard has no object to hold it. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off WorkBoard ## Keep the cadence. Stop preparing it by hand. The objectives export cleanly. The larger change is that the next evaluation does not need a quote to start. 01 Export objectives and key results from WorkBoard WorkBoard exports the OKR set with owners, targets, current values and the alignment tree, and its API covers the same ground for a scripted move. The hierarchy imports intact. 02 Drop the alignment tree, keep the goals WorkBoard's alignment follows the reporting line. Vindaris derives alignment from the work, so the tree does not need recreating. Import the goals and let the structure form from what is actually feeding them. 03 Connect the delivery tools Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. This is the layer the metric connectors were approximating, and the point where a key result gains the ability to explain itself. 04 Retire the check-in cadence The recurring confidence round that kept WorkBoard current has no input left to collect. Business reviews start from derived progress, and the OKR office role shrinks to designing goals rather than chasing status. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs WorkBoard, feature by feature. WorkBoard wins on enterprise cadence. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the key result. Feature Vindaris WorkBoard How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Manual check-ins from goal owners, plus metric connectors that move numbers without context. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. OKR-first. KPIs, EOS Rocks and OGSM need workarounds. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer. Tasks and projects stay in Jira, Asana, Planner or Salesforce. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Confidence ratings and RAG status entered by people, not derived from task movement. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Enterprise dashboards and business-review exports built for the executive cadence. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Goal owner per objective, cascaded through the org chart. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. No free tier. Pricing is quoted, not published. Best fit Mid-market teams that want execution status traced back to the tasks that produced it. Fortune 500 programmes with a dedicated OKR office and a procurement-led buying cycle. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## Quote-only enterprise pricing, or a published price you can start on today. This is the sharpest difference between the two products and it is worth stating plainly. WorkBoard does not publish pricing, so a mid-market team cannot find out what it costs without entering a sales process. Plan WorkBoard Vindaris Free tier No free tier. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Not published. Quoted per organization. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Not published. Enterprise configurations negotiated. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing No. Evaluation begins with a sales conversation. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Annual contract, typically with a seat floor. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris publishes everything: free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, EUR 10 per user per month for Connect, EUR 20 for Pro. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between WorkBoard and Vindaris? WorkBoard is an enterprise OKR platform: it stores objectives, cascades them through the org chart, and reports on progress supplied by goal owners. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risk before a check-in would surface it. WorkBoard answers what people reported. Vindaris answers what the work is doing. How much does WorkBoard cost compared to Vindaris? WorkBoard does not publish pricing. Deals are quoted per organization through an enterprise sales cycle with an annual contract, which means evaluation starts with procurement rather than with the product. Vindaris publishes its plans, is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, and has no minimum contract. See vindaris.com/pricing. What happened to Quantive after the WorkBoard acquisition? WorkBoard acquired Quantive (formerly Gtmhub) in 2025, consolidating two enterprise OKR platforms into one. Acquired products typically run in parallel for a period before features are rationalized into the acquirer's platform, so existing customers face a roadmap set by a different company. If you are re-evaluating anyway, it is a reasonable moment to ask whether the next tool should be architecturally different. Can I migrate from WorkBoard to Vindaris? Yes. Export your objectives, key results and KPIs from WorkBoard and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM and hybrid structures, so nothing has to be rewritten. Your team keeps working in their existing tools, which Vindaris connects to through bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from WorkBoard is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # AchieveIt Alternative - Traceable Plans | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/achieveit-alternative AchieveIt Alternative Report-first architecture # AchieveIt collects status updates. It does not observe execution. Plan roll-up for large organizations, driven by scheduled status collection. Vindaris derives the same picture from the work, continuously. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short AchieveIt is a strategic plan and initiative reporting platform: it holds the plan hierarchy, automates status collection, and renders executive dashboards from what managers report. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risk from the work itself. AchieveIt reports the plan. Vindaris connects it to proof. Where AchieveIt stops ## Large-scale plan roll-up, powered by chasing people. AchieveIt handles the hard part of large organizations: many plans, many owners, consistent roll-up, automated reminders to keep updates flowing. Healthcare systems and large enterprises run real portfolios on it. AchieveIt is good at three jobs: holding a structured plan and initiative hierarchy, automating the status requests so managers stop chasing updates, and rendering dashboards an executive team will accept in a board meeting. Those are real strengths, and teams that adopt it usually do stop chasing updates. They are the strengths of a reporting system. The work that executes those plans still happens in project management tools, spreadsheets, CRMs and task boards that AchieveIt has no native connection to. Status flows upward from managers who interpret progress and type it into a form. The dashboard reflects that interpretation rather than the ground truth. When a strategic initiative shows 70 percent complete, nothing in the system can trace the number back to the tasks, people and projects that produced it. The structural gap Plans and delivery remain two systems. AchieveIt sits above the work and asks people to report on it, which is the same architecture that limits every goal tool. A tracking layer that depends on humans to bridge the gap gets a bridge that is late, filtered and incomplete. How it broke, every quarter 01 Update request arrives Owners submit status the delivery tools already hold. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Strong roll-up across many plans and owners. - Automated reminders that keep updates flowing. - Consistent structure across large, distributed organizations. - Good fit for healthcare and multi-site enterprises. ### Where teams hit the limit - The engine is status collection rather than observation. - Roll-up reflects what owners submitted. - Update chasing continues indefinitely. - Delivery work sits outside the system. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## Collecting status well is still collecting status. Report-first model AchieveIt and most of the category - Plans live in one system. Work lives in another. - Owners submit status on a schedule. - Integrations import values rather than traceable work. - Roll-ups show what owners submitted, which is not what happened. - Chasing updates never ends. Work Graph model Vindaris - Initiative status is traced from tasks, not collected from managers. - No update request cycle, because there is nothing waiting to be reported. - A percent-complete figure decomposes into the work that produced it. - Risk surfaces from stalled work rather than from a RAG colour someone chose. - Any framework, so OKRs and Rocks sit beside the strategic plan. ## AchieveIt models the plan. It does not read the work. AchieveIt's objects follow the reporting process: the plan, the initiative, the update, the owner who supplies it. The product is very good at making that process reliable. Every value in it originates as a human judgement typed into a form. Object AchieveIt Vindaris Central object The initiative and its scheduled update The task and its edges up to the initiative Progress source A percentage the owner reports Task state in the connected delivery tools What 70 percent means The owner's estimate at the last update Fourteen tasks, nine closed, three stalled Update cadence Scheduled, with automated reminders Continuous Status colour Set by the reporter Derived from pace against plan AchieveIt's automated reminders solve the collection problem well, which is why teams stop chasing updates after they adopt it. What automation cannot change is the data source. An initiative reported at 70 percent is a claim, and the system holds no way to check it, so the dashboard is exactly as accurate as the most optimistic manager in the chain. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off AchieveIt ## Keep the portfolio. Stop chasing the updates. The plan and initiative structure imports directly. The reporting cycle is what stops. 01 Export plans and initiatives from AchieveIt AchieveIt exports the plan hierarchy with initiatives, owners, target dates and current status. The structure imports intact, so the plan modelling work is preserved rather than repeated. 02 Connect the tools the initiatives run in Every AchieveIt initiative is delivered somewhere else: a project tool, a CRM, a task board, a spreadsheet. Connect those. This is the layer the update requests were describing second-hand. 03 Attach real work to each initiative Confirm the proposed mappings between synced projects and the initiatives they deliver. From that point the percentage on the dashboard is a count of what closed rather than an estimate of what feels done. 04 Switch off the update requests The scheduled reminder has nothing left to collect. Owners still write commentary where judgement is genuinely required, but the number underneath is no longer something they produce, which also removes the incentive to round it up. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs AchieveIt, feature by feature. AchieveIt wins on large-scale roll-up. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the initiative. Feature Vindaris AchieveIt How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Reported by plan owners and managers on a scheduled update cadence. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. Strategic plans and initiatives. OKR, EOS and OGSM structures are workarounds. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer. Delivery happens in PM tools, CRMs and spreadsheets. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. RAG status set by the person reporting, not detected from task movement. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Executive dashboards and board-ready initiative rollups. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Initiative owner, with progress rolled up through the reporting chain. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. No free tier. Pricing on quote. Best fit Teams that need an initiative's status traced to the tasks and people behind it. Organizations whose main problem is collecting plan updates on a reliable cadence. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## A plan-reporting platform, or a system that reads the plan. AchieveIt sells into strategy offices and PMOs with quoted pricing, so evaluation starts with a conversation about scope and seats. Plan AchieveIt Vindaris Free tier No free tier. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Not published. Quoted per organization. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Not published. Scoped by plan count and user count. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing No. Evaluation begins with a sales conversation. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Annual contract. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris publishes every tier: free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, EUR 10 per user per month for Connect, EUR 20 for Pro. You can model your plan and connect a tool before speaking to anyone. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between AchieveIt and Vindaris? AchieveIt is a strategic plan and initiative reporting platform: it holds the plan hierarchy, automates status collection, and renders executive dashboards from what managers report. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risk from the work itself. AchieveIt reports the plan. Vindaris connects it to proof. Does AchieveIt connect to project management tools? AchieveIt is built around collecting status from plan owners rather than reading it from delivery systems, so the tasks and projects that execute an initiative stay in tools it has no native layer for. Vindaris syncs bidirectionally with HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira and Asana, so the work and the plan share one system and progress needs no manual entry. Can Vindaris replace AchieveIt for strategic planning? Yes for plan execution, tracking and reporting. Vindaris holds strategic plans, initiatives, goals and KPIs in any framework, and derives status from the work beneath them. What it deliberately does not do is Gantt-style timeline planning. The plan structure comes from the goals and their work connections rather than from a visual planning overlay. Can I migrate from AchieveIt to Vindaris? Yes. Export your plans, initiatives and KPIs from AchieveIt and bring them into Vindaris as-is. Vindaris supports OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks, OGSM and hybrid structures, so the plan does not need rewriting. Your team keeps their existing work tools, which Vindaris connects to through bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from AchieveIt is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo × --- # EOS One Alternative - Any Framework | Vindaris URL: https://vindaris.com/eos-one-alternative EOS One Alternative Ritual-first architecture # EOS One runs the meeting. The scorecard is still typed in. Purpose-built for the EOS ritual, with numbers entered rather than derived from work. Vindaris runs EOS Rocks on top of the work itself. Start free Book a demo Built by the strategy execution experts trusted by: Last reviewed August 2026 In short EOS One is a single-framework product built for the Entrepreneurial Operating System: Rocks, Scorecard, Issues and L10 meetings. Vindaris runs EOS natively alongside OKRs, KPIs, OGSM, SMART goals and Balanced Scorecard, and adds a native work layer so each Rock traces to the tasks delivering it. EOS One reports Rock status from the meeting. Vindaris derives it from the work. Where EOS One stops ## Faithful to the method. Blind to the work. EOS One does exactly what the method asks: Rocks, the Scorecard, the Issues list, the Level 10 meeting agenda. For a team running EOS by the book, the fit is close. EOS One was built for companies running the Entrepreneurial Operating System, and it models the method faithfully: Rocks, the Scorecard, the Issues list, and the Level 10 meeting cadence. For a leadership team fully committed to EOS, the product does its job and implementers recommend it without much qualification. The problem starts as the organization grows past that single framework. Many companies adopt EOS at leadership level while product teams want OKRs, sales runs on KPIs, and a division acquired last year still uses OGSM. EOS One cannot hold that. It is also missing a work layer: Rocks sit in EOS One while the tasks and projects that deliver them live in Planner, HubSpot, Jira or Google. A Rock gets marked on track or off track based on a conversation in the L10 meeting rather than on verifiable progress. The structural gap A Rock without connected work is a wish with a deadline. EOS One can tell you a Rock is due this quarter. It cannot show you the fourteen tasks feeding it, the three that stalled, or the owner whose workload makes completion unlikely. The status comes out of a meeting, not out of the work. How it broke, every quarter 01 Level 10 meeting arrives Owners enter scorecard numbers before the meeting. 02 The update slips A ritual that adds no new information gets dropped. 03 The dashboard stays green The last reported number is the only number there is. 04 The quarter misses The stall was visible in the work weeks earlier. ### What teams consistently praised - Purpose-built for the EOS method and its language. - Rocks, Scorecard, Issues and meeting agenda in one place. - Familiar to teams working with an EOS implementer. - Simple enough that leadership teams adopt it quickly. ### Where teams hit the limit - Scorecard numbers are entered, not derived from work. - Rocks are tracked as items rather than connected work. - Locked to EOS, which limits teams that outgrow it. - No signal between weekly meetings. Click thru live demo Pre-built workspace. No signup. Two models compared ## The ritual is faithful. The data is still manual. Ritual-first model EOS One and most of the category - Rocks live in one system. Work lives in another. - Owners enter scorecard numbers before each meeting. - Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome. - The scorecard shows what owners entered, which is not what happened. - Locked to EOS, so a framework change means a tool change. Work Graph model Vindaris - Rocks connect to the tasks delivering them, so status is not a meeting opinion. - EOS runs natively beside OKRs, KPIs and OGSM in one workspace. - The Issues list fills from detected risk, not only from what someone raises. - Outgrowing EOS is a syntax change rather than a product change. - Single-owner accountability, which EOS requires, enforced structurally. ## EOS One models the meeting. It does not read the work. EOS One is a faithful implementation of the EOS method, and its objects are the method's objects: the Rock, the Scorecard measure, the Issue, the L10 agenda. The model assumes the weekly meeting is where state changes, because in EOS it is. Object EOS One Vindaris Central object The L10 meeting and its agenda The Rock, and the work under it Rock status On track or off track, declared in the meeting Derived from the tasks feeding the Rock Tasks behind a Rock Not modelled Synced from Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot, Google Issues Raised by a person who noticed Raised by a person, or detected from stalled work Other frameworks Not supported OKR, KPI, OGSM, SMART, BSC alongside EOS A Rock marked on track in Monday's L10 stays on track all week regardless of what happens to the work under it, because the meeting is the only thing that can change its state. That is fine when the Rock owner has full visibility of their own work, and it degrades as soon as a Rock depends on another team. What changes in practice ## Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync. ### See every goal connected to the work moving it. Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax. Alignment Canvas → ### Spot risk while there is still time to fix it. Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number. ### Combine tasks and projects across your systems. Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools. All integrations → ### Everyone knows exactly what matters most. A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due. ### Run reports the way management needs them. Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email. Moving off EOS One ## Keep Rocks and the Level 10. Connect them to the work. Nothing about how you run EOS has to change. What changes is where Rock status comes from. 01 Export Rocks, Scorecard and Issues from EOS One Export the current quarter's Rocks with their owners and due dates, the Scorecard measures with their history, and the open Issues list. All three import as native objects rather than as approximations. 02 Keep the L10 cadence exactly as it is The meeting structure, the segue, the Scorecard review, IDS, the to-do list: none of it changes. Vindaris models the cadence rather than replacing it, so the implementer's guidance still applies. 03 Connect the tools the Rocks are delivered in Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. Each Rock gains the tasks feeding it, which is the layer EOS One leaves to the owner's judgement. 04 Let the Issues list fill itself Stalled work under a Rock becomes a flagged issue before the meeting rather than during it. The L10 opens with a list of things that are genuinely off, and the on-track round stops being a formality. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo No credit card required Feature comparison ## Vindaris vs EOS One, feature by feature. EOS One wins on method fidelity. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the Rock. Feature Vindaris EOS One How progress is measured Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. Self-reported in the L10 meeting as on track or off track. Goal frameworks supported Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. EOS only. No OKR, KPI, OGSM or hybrid support. Connection to real work Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. No native work layer. Rocks exist without traceable task connections. Risk detection Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. Raised as an Issue when someone notices, which is usually in the meeting. Status reporting Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. Scorecard and L10 meeting views built for the weekly cadence. Capacity and bandwidth Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. Not covered. Ownership model Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. Single accountable owner per Rock, which EOS enforces well. Free plan Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. One free seat, then per-seat pricing with no contract. Best fit Companies running EOS today that expect to add other frameworks as they scale. Teams fully committed to EOS and nothing else, with an implementer guiding them. The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper . What it costs ## A single-framework seat, or a seat that covers every framework. EOS One prices per user for teams running the EOS method, with the pricing tied to the implementation rather than to feature tiers. Plan EOS One Vindaris Free tier Free trial rather than a free tier. Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. Entry paid plan Per-user monthly pricing tied to the EOS implementation. Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. Upper plan Scoped by team size; no work-layer tier exists to upgrade to. Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. Published pricing Partially. Base rates published, implementations quoted. Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. Minimum commitment Typically annual, often alongside an implementer engagement. None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, then EUR 10 per user per month, and every framework is included at every tier. A team that adds OKRs next year does not add a second subscription. Free €0 /forever Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required. - All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board) - Set up 2 integrations of your choice - Invite up to 4 additional members - 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month Sign Up for Free Most popular Connect €10 /user/mo Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management. - All in Free - All integrations, unlimited sync - Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled - Up to 10 users within one organization Start with Connect Pro €20 /user/mo Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments. - All in Connect - Unlimited users within one organization - Direct human support email, 24h response time - Human-led onboarding support Start with Pro See full plan comparison → Frequently asked questions ## Common questions, answered What is the difference between EOS One and Vindaris? EOS One is a single-framework product built for the Entrepreneurial Operating System: Rocks, Scorecard, Issues and L10 meetings. Vindaris runs EOS natively alongside OKRs, KPIs, OGSM, SMART goals and Balanced Scorecard, and adds a native work layer so each Rock traces to the tasks delivering it. EOS One reports Rock status from the meeting. Vindaris derives it from the work. Does Vindaris support EOS Rocks and Level 10 meetings? Yes. Rocks, the Scorecard, the Issues list and the weekly L10 cadence all model natively, with the single accountable owner per Rock that EOS requires. The difference is that each Rock connects to the tasks and projects feeding it, so the meeting starts from observed progress rather than from a round of self-assessment. See vindaris.com/eos. What happens when we outgrow EOS? In EOS One, outgrowing the framework means changing product. In Vindaris the framework is a syntax choice, so a product team can adopt OKRs, operations can run KPIs, and an acquired division can keep OGSM, all in the same system as the Rocks the leadership team still runs. Nothing has to be migrated or translated when the operating model evolves. Can I migrate from EOS One to Vindaris? Yes. Export your Rocks, Scorecard measures and Issues from EOS One and bring them into Vindaris as-is. The EOS structure carries over intact, including single-owner accountability. Your team keeps their existing work tools, which Vindaris connects to through bidirectional sync. See vindaris.com/pricing for details. Keep going ## Free resources for this topic A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required. Excel template OKR tracker A ready-to-use OKR spreadsheet with scoring, check-ins, and a rollup view for the cycle. Playbook Run an OKR cycle The full cycle from drafting to grading, with the common traps marked. From the blog Best OKR software in 2026 The market compared, sorted by what actually keeps a program alive. Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it. ## Switching from EOS One is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional. Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required. Start free Book a demo © 2026 Vindaris. All rights reserved. Sitemap Your privacy choice We use necessary cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set analytics and advertising cookies - Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, and our own campaign-attribution cookie - to measure our marketing, understand how the site is used, including heatmaps and session replay of your visit, and show you relevant ads, including remarketing across vindaris.com and app.vindaris.com. Decline and none of these are set. Privacy Notice . Decline Accept See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever. Sign up free Schedule Demo Call View Pre-built Demo ×