All postsAlle Beiträge
OKRs   Jun 24, 2026 · 7 min read

The goal cascade is dead. Long live the goal graph.

Die Ziel-Kaskade ist tot. Es lebe der Ziel-Graph.

Every OKR tool ships with the same model: cascade. Company goals at the top, team goals below them, individual goals below those. Neat tree, clean lines. Looks great in a deck. Doesn't survive contact with how value actually moves through a company.

Why the tree breaks

Value rarely flows down a single branch. A go-to-market objective requires Product, Marketing, Sales, Customer Success, and Finance to do specific things, in sequence, with dependencies between them. None of those teams is under the others. The goal lives across the org chart, not down it.

When you force this into a cascade, two things happen. The originating team owns the parent goal nominally, but can't move it without the others. The other teams either copy the parent goal into their own tree (duplication) or refuse to (orphaning). Either way, the cascade lies about who is doing what.

What a graph looks like

A goal graph treats objectives as nodes and dependencies as edges. A single objective can be parented by multiple strategic bets, and a single bet can be supported by objectives across many teams. The shape is a directed acyclic graph, not a tree.

The practical consequences:

Why no one ships this

Because graphs are harder to draw than trees. The slide for a cascade is one tidy pyramid. The slide for a graph looks like a subway map. Tool vendors pick the prettier one and ship.

But the company doesn't operate on slides. It operates on the actual relationships between goals — and those relationships are graph-shaped whether your tool admits it or not.

The Vindaris view

Model what's real, not what's drawable. The graph is harder to render and easier to operate. The cascade is the opposite. Pick the one that matches the work.

Jedes OKR-Tool kommt mit demselben Modell: Kaskade. Unternehmensziele oben, Teamziele darunter, individuelle Ziele unten. Sauberer Baum. Überlebt nicht den Kontakt damit, wie Wert tatsächlich durch ein Unternehmen fließt.

Ein Go-to-Market-Ziel braucht Product, Marketing, Sales, CS und Finance — keiner steht unter dem anderen. Das Ziel lebt quer über das Organigramm, nicht hinunter.

Ein Ziel-Graph behandelt Objektive als Knoten und Abhängigkeiten als Kanten. Ein Objektiv kann von mehreren Wetten geparented sein. Härter zu zeichnen, einfacher zu betreiben. Die Kaskade ist das Gegenteil. Wähle, was zur Arbeit passt.