WorkBoard runs the review. It does not analyze the work activity.
Vindaris finds the miss weeks before the results review would. It analyzes the work activity behind every goal, the tasks and conversations your teams already generate, derives live status, and flags a goal the moment its work stalls. WorkBoard runs enterprise OKR cadence on manual check-ins, so the miss only surfaces when the review comes around.
Last reviewed August 2026
WorkBoard is an enterprise OKR platform: it stores objectives, cascades them through the org chart, and reports on progress supplied by goal owners. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software: strategy, goals and KPIs mapped down to every project and task, with the Work Graph flagging execution risk before a check-in would surface it. WorkBoard answers what people reported. Vindaris answers what the work is doing.
The cadence is the product. The data feeding it is still manual.
WorkBoard is built for the enterprise operating rhythm: business reviews, results meetings, alignment sessions, executive roll-ups. Run well, that cadence creates real accountability.
WorkBoard does one thing very well. It gives a large organization a structured way to define OKRs, cascade them through the org chart, and report on them in a format an executive team will accept. The enterprise wrapper around that is genuinely strong: SSO, permission models, audit trails, the controls procurement asks about before anything else.
The limitation sits underneath all of it. Teams define objectives in WorkBoard, then do the actual work in Jira, Asana, Planner, Salesforce, or a spreadsheet. Bridging the two is a check-in, a weekly update, or a connector that moves a number without the context behind it. Leadership gets a reliable view of what people reported. It does not get a view of whether the work below those objectives is moving.
WorkBoard does not publish its pricing. Custom quotes, annual contracts, and a procurement cycle stand between a mid-market team and a product conversation. Vindaris publishes its plans, is free to start, and requires no minimum contract. See pricing details.
What teams consistently praised
- Serious enterprise OKR machinery and governance.
- Business review cadence that senior teams stick to.
- Strong alignment and cascade tooling at scale.
- Mature enterprise controls and rollout support.
Where teams hit the limit
- Check-ins and results reviews carry the whole data model.
- The review finds the miss rather than the graph.
- Heavy rollout and change-management overhead.
- Priced and scoped for large enterprises.
Enterprise machinery around the same manual core.
- Goals live in one system. Work lives in another.
- Teams update results as preparation for a meeting.
- Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome.
- Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened.
- The miss is found in the review, not before it.
- Published pricing, so evaluation starts with the product rather than procurement.
- A native work layer, so an objective can name the tasks behind its number.
- Risk detected from task movement rather than from a confidence rating.
- Weight suited to a few hundred people, not a few hundred thousand.
- Any framework, without the OKR office required to run it.
WorkBoard models the review. It does not analyze the work activity.
WorkBoard's model is built for scale: objectives, key results, alignment across a deep org chart, business reviews on top. It handles a Fortune 500 hierarchy better than anything else in the category. What it does not hold is any representation of delivery.
| Object | WorkBoard | Vindaris |
|---|---|---|
| Central object | The objective, cascaded through the org chart | The task, and the edges up to the goal |
| Alignment source | The reporting line | Which work feeds which goal |
| Progress source | Check-ins, plus connectors that move a metric value | Task state in Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot |
| Behind a key-result number | Nothing the system can show you | The projects, tasks, owners and capacity |
| Risk signal | A lowered confidence rating | Pace and focus measured against plan |
A metric connector is not a work layer, and the difference matters when a number goes the wrong way. A connector can tell you the value dropped. It cannot tell you that three of the fourteen tasks feeding it were reassigned last month and one has not moved since. That information exists in the delivery tool; WorkBoard has no object to hold it.
Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync.
See every goal connected to the work moving it.
Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax.
Alignment Canvas →
Spot risk while there is still time to fix it.
Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number.
Combine tasks and projects across your systems.
Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools.
All integrations →
Everyone knows exactly what matters most.
A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due.
Run reports the way management needs them.
Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email.
Keep the cadence. Stop preparing it by hand.
The objectives export cleanly. The larger change is that the next evaluation does not need a quote to start.
WorkBoard exports the OKR set with owners, targets, current values and the alignment tree, and its API covers the same ground for a scripted move. The hierarchy imports intact.
WorkBoard's alignment follows the reporting line. Vindaris derives alignment from the work, so the tree does not need recreating. Import the goals and let the structure form from what is actually feeding them.
Connect Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. This is the layer the metric connectors were approximating, and the point where a key result gains the ability to explain itself.
The recurring confidence round that kept WorkBoard current has no input left to collect. Business reviews start from derived progress, and the OKR office role shrinks to designing goals rather than chasing status.
Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required.
Start free Book a demo No credit card requiredVindaris vs WorkBoard, feature by feature.
WorkBoard wins on enterprise cadence. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the key result.
| Feature | Vindaris | WorkBoard |
|---|---|---|
| How progress is measured | Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. | Manual check-ins from goal owners, plus metric connectors that move numbers without context. |
| Goal frameworks supported | Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. | OKR-first. KPIs, EOS Rocks and OGSM need workarounds. |
| Connection to work activity | Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. | No native work layer. Tasks and projects stay in Jira, Asana, Planner or Salesforce. |
| Risk detection | Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. | Confidence ratings and RAG status entered by people, not derived from task movement. |
| Status reporting | Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. | Enterprise dashboards and business-review exports built for the executive cadence. |
| Capacity and bandwidth | Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. | Not covered. |
| Ownership model | Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. | Goal owner per objective, cascaded through the org chart. |
| Free plan | Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. | No free tier. Pricing is quoted, not published. |
| Best fit | Mid-market teams that want execution status traced back to the tasks that produced it. | Fortune 500 programmes with a dedicated OKR office and a procurement-led buying cycle. |
The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper.
Quote-only enterprise pricing, or a published price you can start on today.
This is the sharpest difference between the two products and it is worth stating plainly. WorkBoard does not publish pricing, so a mid-market team cannot find out what it costs without entering a sales process.
| Plan | WorkBoard | Vindaris |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | No free tier. | Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. |
| Entry paid plan | Not published. Quoted per organization. | Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. |
| Upper plan | Not published. Enterprise configurations negotiated. | Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. |
| Published pricing | No. Evaluation begins with a sales conversation. | Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. |
| Minimum commitment | Annual contract, typically with a seat floor. | None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. |
Vindaris publishes everything: free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations, EUR 10 per user per month for Connect, EUR 20 for Pro. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee.
Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required.
- All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board)
- Set up 2 integrations of your choice
- Invite up to 4 additional members
- 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month
Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management.
- All in Free
- All integrations, unlimited sync
- Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled
- Up to 10 users within one organization
Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments.
- All in Connect
- Unlimited users within one organization
- Direct human support email, 24h response time
- Human-led onboarding support
Common questions, answered
What is the difference between WorkBoard and Vindaris?
How much does WorkBoard cost compared to Vindaris?
What happened to Quantive after the WorkBoard acquisition?
Can I migrate from WorkBoard to Vindaris?
What are the best WorkBoard alternatives in 2026?
Free resources for this topic
A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required.
Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it.
Switching from WorkBoard is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional.
Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required.
