Confidence is what the owner says. Not what the work shows.
Tability makes weekly check-ins pleasant and fast. The score still reflects a person's judgement. Vindaris derives the picture from task data.
Last reviewed August 2026
Tability is an OKR tracking tool built around a weekly check-in: owners rate confidence on each outcome and the ratings roll up. Vindaris is intelligent strategy execution software with a native work layer, so progress and execution risk are derived from the tasks moving each goal rather than from a rating. Tability reports how the owner feels. Vindaris reports what the work is doing.
A friendly check-in ritual, measuring the same opinion.
Confidence is self-assessed. A team can report amber for six weeks while the underlying work has not moved at all, and nothing in the system disagrees.
Tability gives you clean OKRs, weekly check-in reminders, confidence scoring, and AI-assisted goal drafting. The cadence is the product. Every week, owners open Tability and rate how each outcome is going on a traffic-light scale, add a note, and move on. It is a genuinely good ritual. The problem is what the rating is based on: a person's read on the situation, not the work that is or is not happening underneath it.
When confidence is self-reported, it drifts. An owner stays optimistic until the quarter is nearly over, then the green turns red in week eleven with no warning the system could have given. The work that should have moved the outcome lives in Jira, Asana, Planner, or a spreadsheet, and Tability never sees it. It sees the summary a busy person typed under time pressure.
In Tability, a goal's status is an opinion. A well-informed opinion, often, but still a manual input disconnected from the underlying work. Every insight depends on owners checking in honestly and on time. When check-ins slip, and across a busy quarter they always slip, the picture leadership sees stops matching reality, and nobody can tell when it started.
What teams consistently praised
- Fast, low-friction weekly check-ins.
- Confidence scoring that teams actually complete.
- Good Slack prompts and reminders.
- Quick to adopt without a rollout project.
Where teams hit the limit
- Confidence reflects judgement, not task data.
- A goal can look amber for weeks without work moving.
- Check-in quality decays under delivery pressure.
- No signal between check-ins.
A better ritual is still a ritual.
- Goals live in one system. Work lives in another.
- Teams report confidence as a weekly exercise.
- Integrations move a percentage, not traceable links between effort and outcome.
- Dashboards show what teams reported, which is not what happened.
- Nothing contradicts an optimistic score.
- Progress is read from the work, so a confidence rating is never the input.
- No check-in reminder loop, because there is nothing waiting to be checked in.
- Risk comes from task movement and pace, not from a person's self-assessment.
- Every goal traces down to the tasks and people delivering it.
- OKRs, KPIs, EOS Rocks and OGSM in one workspace, not OKRs only.
Tability models the check-in. It does not read the work.
Tability's model is elegant and small: an outcome, a current value, and a confidence rating the owner sets each week. Everything the product does well follows from that model, and so does everything it cannot do.
| Object | Tability | Vindaris |
|---|---|---|
| Central object | The check-in on an outcome | The edge between a goal and the work under it |
| Progress source | A value and a confidence rating the owner sets | Task state in the connected work tools |
| What confidence means | How the owner feels about the outcome | Pace and focus measured against the plan |
| When a goal is at risk | When someone lowers the rating | When the work under it slows, whoever has noticed |
| Contributing work | Not modelled | Projects and tasks, with owners and capacity |
A confidence rating is a genuinely useful signal, and Tability collects it more gracefully than any competitor. The limit is that it is a lagging one. Owners lower confidence after they have concluded the outcome is in trouble, which is generally after the work has been visibly stuck for a while. Vindaris reads the stuck work directly, so the signal arrives at the point where it is still actionable.
Five views that keep strategy and execution in sync.
See every goal connected to the work moving it.
Drag and drop your alignment structure. Roll up work progress, KPIs and goals without enforcing any framework syntax.
Alignment Canvas →
Spot risk while there is still time to fix it.
Run heatmaps across teams, goals, KPIs and projects. Save views and get notified when risk levels change, from task movement rather than a reported number.
Combine tasks and projects across your systems.
Sync HubSpot, MS Planner, Google Tasks, Asana and more into one view. Bidirectional sync keeps everything current while teams stay in their own tools.
All integrations →
Everyone knows exactly what matters most.
A clear view of each person's goals, KPIs, projects and tasks. Start the week focused on what is due.
Run reports the way management needs them.
Rank teams, spot risks, compare KPIs to work. AI summaries push updates to Slack, Teams and email.
Keep the weekly rhythm. Stop guessing the number.
Tability's structure maps cleanly onto Vindaris, so the migration is mostly a matter of attaching work underneath the outcomes you already have.
Tability exports plans with their outcomes, targets and current values, and its API covers the same ground if you would rather script it. Bring the export in as-is; the outcome structure carries over with targets intact.
Tability's initiatives are usually thin references to work happening elsewhere. Connect that elsewhere: Jira, Asana, Planner, HubSpot or Google. The initiatives stop being labels and become the actual tasks.
Confirm the proposed mappings between synced work and each outcome. From then on the current value and the risk state come from the tasks, which is what the weekly confidence rating was estimating.
The Slack nudge asking for a rating has nothing left to collect. Owners still write commentary when there is something worth saying, but the number underneath it is no longer their responsibility to produce.
Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required.
Start free Book a demo No credit card requiredVindaris vs Tability, feature by feature.
Tability wins on check-in experience. This table compares what each product knows about the work beneath the goal.
| Feature | Vindaris | Tability |
|---|---|---|
| How progress is measured | Read from task-level work and Slack context in the tools your team already uses. | Weekly confidence check-ins, rated by the owner on a traffic-light scale. |
| Goal frameworks supported | Framework-agnostic: OKR, KPI, EOS Rocks, OGSM, SMART, Balanced Scorecard, or hybrid. | Built around OKRs; other frameworks fit awkwardly. |
| Connection to real work | Native work layer with bidirectional sync to HubSpot, Planner, Google, Jira, Asana. | Integrations push updates in; no native work layer to trace tasks. |
| Risk detection | Automatic execution-risk flags from task movement, focus and pace against plan. | Surfaces when an owner lowers their confidence score. |
| Status reporting | Live views and AI risk summaries pushed to Slack, Teams, and email. | Weekly check-in digest and OKR dashboards. |
| Capacity and bandwidth | Built-in bandwidth and capacity planning. | Not covered. |
| Ownership model | Single-owner accountability enforced structurally. | One owner per outcome. |
| Free plan | Free forever, including 2 integrations and up to 5 people. | Free trial, then per-user paid plans. |
| Best fit | Teams that need progress read from delivery rather than rated once a week. | Small teams that want a light, well-designed weekly OKR check-in ritual. |
The category as a whole is compared in the best strategy execution software guide, and the argument underneath it is set out in the strategy execution gap whitepaper.
Paying per seat for check-ins, or for a connected work layer.
Tability publishes per-user pricing with a free band for small teams, which is more transparent than most of the category. The question is what the seat buys.
| Plan | Tability | Vindaris |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Free band for a small team with limited plans and history. | Free forever. Up to 5 people, 2 integrations, all core features. |
| Entry paid plan | Per-user monthly pricing, published, with paid tiers by feature depth. | Connect, EUR 10 per user per month. All integrations, unlimited sync. |
| Upper plan | Higher tiers add plans, history and integrations rather than a work layer. | Pro, EUR 20 per user per month. Unlimited users in one organization. |
| Published pricing | Yes, published on the website. | Yes, on the website. No quote required to evaluate. |
| Minimum commitment | Monthly or annual. | None. No seat minimum, no annual term, no setup fee. |
Vindaris is free forever for up to 5 people with 2 integrations and the full Work Graph, then EUR 10 per user per month for unlimited sync across every integration.
Best for individual contributors, small teams or startups. No credit card required.
- All features (incl. Alignment Canvas, My Priorities, Heatmap, Data Studio & Task Board)
- Set up 2 integrations of your choice
- Invite up to 4 additional members
- 5 ad-hoc AI risk summaries per month
Best for teams, small agencies, or departmental and team management.
- All in Free
- All integrations, unlimited sync
- Unlimited AI risk summaries & alignment suggestions - ad-hoc and scheduled
- Up to 10 users within one organization
Best for multiple teams, exec teams, Chiefs of Staff, departmental leadership or full-org deployments.
- All in Connect
- Unlimited users within one organization
- Direct human support email, 24h response time
- Human-led onboarding support
Common questions, answered
What is the difference between Tability and Vindaris?
Does Vindaris have check-ins like Tability?
Can I migrate from Tability to Vindaris?
Is Vindaris free to use?
Free resources for this topic
A template you can download, a playbook to run, and the thinking behind both. No email required.
Or start with the full picture: strategy execution software that connects your plan to the work delivering it.
Switching from Tability is a choice. Repeating its architecture is optional.
Free forever for up to 5 people. No credit card required.
