See Vindaris in action. Alignment canvas, Work Graph alerts, data studio, heatmaps - full strategy execution, free forever.
Prioritization debates run in circles because every argument changes dimension mid-sentence: one person is talking about reach while the other is talking about effort. A scoring model fixes the dimensions. RICE multiplies reach, impact and confidence, then divides by effort; WSJF divides the cost of delay by job size, which favors small urgent work. This calculator runs either model over up to ten initiatives and ranks them. The score is not the decision, but it makes the disagreement specific, which is most of the battle.
Reach times impact times confidence, divided by effort. Reach is people or events per period, impact is scored on a scale from 0.25 to 3, confidence is a percentage that discounts optimism, and effort is person-months. The division by effort is what makes RICE favor cheap, high-leverage work.
Weighted Shortest Job First divides the cost of delay, business value plus time criticality plus risk reduction, by job size. It comes from SAFe and beats RICE when timing dominates: it surfaces small urgent items that a RICE score would rank mid-list.
Two big ones. The inputs are estimates, so the output inherits their optimism, and the model ranks a list rather than checking reality. After the ranking, the real question is whether capacity actually flows to the top items, and that needs observation, not scoring.
Vindaris turns good goals into a living system: each one connected to the work that proves it, so quality is enforced by reality, not a one-time check. Start free, no credit card.
Sign Up for Free